APPENDIX ASURVEY DESIGNA.1 Sample Design and ImplementationThe sample specifications for the O<strong>DHS</strong> called for a self-weighting sample of approximately3,600 women 15-49 representative of the entire state. Considering the cultural homogeneity of OndoState, it was decided that an efficient design would be achieved with 90 primary sampling units (PSUs).Thus, the overall sampling fraction for the O<strong>DHS</strong> wasF3960(Population of Ondo State) (.22)where 3960 is the target sample size increased by 10 percent for nonresponse, and.22 is an estimate of the proportion of women 15-49 in the population(National Population Bureau, 1984).A two-stage sampling procedure was used. In the first stage, census enumeration areas (EAs),were selected with sampling fraction f(1). In the second stage, households were selected with samplingfraction f(2). Within selected households, eligibility for the woman's questionnaire was on a de factobasis: all women 15-49 who stayed in the household the previous night were eligible respondents.Sampling FrameThe sampling frame for PSU selection consisted of two lists of enumeration areas. One listcovered 13 of the 17 Local Govemment Areas (LGAs) of Ondo State and was created between 1984 and1986 as part of Enumeration Area Demarcation Exercise of the National Population Bureau. The otherlist, covering 4 LGAs, consisted of the enumeration areas created for the 1973 Population Census andupdated for the O<strong>DHS</strong>. EAs in the sampling frame showed little variation in measure of size, so that itwas unnecessary to consider selection of the first stage with probability proportional to size.First Stage SelectionWithin each Local Government Area, the EAs were listed with urban areas first in order toachieve some implicit stratification. A systematic sample of 90 EAs was then selected using thefollowing procedure. The total of 7,638 EAs was divided by 90 to give 85 (f (1) = .0118); a randomnumber was selected between 1 and 85; then EAs were selected from the list at the fixed interval of 85,starting with the random number.Household ListingThe next step was to list households in the selected EAs. During the listing operation, the numberof persons residing in each household was recorded. At this stage, it was observed that the EA77
populations obtained from the listing were systematically smaller by about 46 percent (Table A.2) thanthose from the Demarcation Exercise. This discrepancy suggested that the Demarcation Exercise wasproducing serious overestimates of the population. An adjustment was therefore introduced for this in thenext step.Second Stage SelectionThe relationship between sample selection fractions is as follows:f(2) = F/f(1).Thus, before f(2) could be calculated, a value for the overaU sampling fraction, F, was needed and thisrequired an estimate of the population of Ondo State. At the time of second stage sample selection(August 1986), three sources of population information were available: the 1963 Population Census, theEnumeration Area Demarcation Exercise and the household listing operation of the O<strong>DHS</strong> survey. Asshown in Table A.1, the population estimate for the 13 LGAs covered by the Enumeration AreaDemarcation Exercise (2,674,734) indicates an increase of 22 percent over the 1963 Census Populationfor those LGAs (2,193,603). Assuming equal growth in the 4 remaining LGAs, a total populationestimate for Ondo State would be 3,329,856 (2,729,390* 1.22).Table A.IPopulation Estimates for Ondo State, by Local Government AreaPopulation Estimate1963 EA Demarcation ExerciseLocal Government Area Census 1984-8601 Akure 129,415 400,43502 Akoko North 153,311 282,16503 Ekiti East 123,649 156,72004 Ero 224,088 173,27705 Ekiti South 220,076 151,61906 Ekiti Southwest 124,044 87,30407 Ekiti Central 262,337 212,41008 lJero 133,963 117,49009 Ekiti West 171,347 143,555I0 Akoko South 131,508 165,735Ii Ekiti North 181,455 253,11112 Owo 189,847 322,27313 Idanre Ifedore 148,596 208,64014 Ondo* 148,734 --15" Ifesowapo* 109,330 --16 Ilaje Eseodo* 93,926 --17 Ikale* 183,797 --TOTALS - All LGAs 2,729,390 --LGAs 01-13 2,193,603 2,674,734*The EA Demarcation Exercise was not completed in four LGAs at the time ofsample selection.78
- Page 1 and 2:
ONDO STATE, NIGERIADEMOGRAPHICANDHE
- Page 3 and 4:
This report presents the findings o
- Page 5 and 6:
Page4.34.44.54.64.74.8Current Use o
- Page 7 and 8:
PageTable 3.3Table 3.4Table 3.5Tabl
- Page 9 and 10:
PageTable 5.1Table 5.2Table 5.3Tabl
- Page 11 and 12:
PageAPPENDIX A ....................
- Page 14:
PREFACEThe Ondo State Demographic a
- Page 17:
percent of women using each) and th
- Page 20 and 21:
1. BACKGROUND1.1 Geography and Hist
- Page 22 and 23:
Although the reporting of family pl
- Page 24 and 25:
Table 1.2Number of Selected Primary
- Page 26 and 27:
Religion and EthnicityThe majority
- Page 28:
Sources of WaterInformation was als
- Page 31 and 32:
consistent with the comparable stat
- Page 33 and 34:
esults must be interpreted with cau
- Page 35 and 36:
Following the birth of a child, the
- Page 38 and 39:
3. FERTILITY3.1 Fertility Data in t
- Page 40 and 41:
educational attainment, differences
- Page 42 and 43:
distributions. The proportion with
- Page 44: Table 3.5 Percent Distribution of A
- Page 47 and 48: Table 4.1Percentage Knowing Any Met
- Page 49 and 50: Women who had heard of methods were
- Page 51 and 52: Table 4.6Percent Distribution of Al
- Page 53 and 54: Table 4.7Percent Distribution of Cu
- Page 55 and 56: 4.4 Trends in Family Planning Knowl
- Page 57 and 58: Figure 4.4Source of Family Planning
- Page 59 and 60: 4.7 Intention to Use Contraception
- Page 61 and 62: Table 4.16 presents data on wives'
- Page 63 and 64: Table 4.18Percentage of Currently M
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 5.1Fertility PreferencesCurr
- Page 67 and 68: In order to examine fertility prefe
- Page 69 and 70: Table 5.4 also indicates that less
- Page 72 and 73: 6. MORTALITY AND HEALTH6.1 Mortalit
- Page 74 and 75: Table 6.1 Infant and Child Mortalit
- Page 76 and 77: Table 6.3Mean Number of Children Ev
- Page 78 and 79: Table 6.5 • Percent Distribution
- Page 80 and 81: For the investigation of differenti
- Page 82 and 83: In considering the morbidity inform
- Page 84 and 85: Cough/Difficult BreathingThe ODHS c
- Page 86 and 87: Nutritional StatusNutritional statu
- Page 88 and 89: Weight-for-HeightWeight-for-height
- Page 90 and 91: Weight-for-AgeTable 6.13 shows the
- Page 92: REFERENCESCttieh-Johnson, D., Cross
- Page 98 and 99: However, as shown in Table A.2, the
- Page 100 and 101: A total of 32 field staff participa
- Page 102: Table A.3Household Response Rate an
- Page 106 and 107: APPENDIX BSAMPLING ERRORSThe result
- Page 108 and 109: Table B.I List of Variables for Whi
- Page 110 and 111: Table B.2 Sampling Errors (con't):
- Page 112 and 113: Table B.2 Sampling Errors (con't):
- Page 114: Table B.2 Sampling Errors (con't):
- Page 118 and 119: MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ONDO STATE, NIG
- Page 120 and 121: CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGENAME OF
- Page 122: MINISTRY OF HEALTH, C, OVERNMENT OF
- Page 125 and 126: !P............IM,RSKIPattended: pri
- Page 127 and 128: i SECTION 2: REPRODUCTION. ISKIP201
- Page 129 and 130: TABLE 2.1rRECORD INFORMATION STARTI
- Page 131 and 132: SKIP230 CHECK: COMPARE NUMBER OF BI
- Page 133 and 134: I ISECTION 3:HEALTH AND BREASTFEEDI
- Page 135 and 136: 316317CHECK ~2:LAST BIRTH ALIVE [ ]
- Page 137 and 138: SKIP334 What was done?CIRCLECODE 1
- Page 139 and 140: !TABLE 3.1(ASK QUESTIONS STARTING W
- Page 141 and 142: LTABLE 3.3(ASK @UESTIONS ONLY FOR S
- Page 143 and 144: TABLE 3.5CF. TABLE 2.1:ENTER NAME A
- Page 145 and 146:
TABLE 4: IPILL "Women can take •
- Page 147 and 148:
SKIP413CHECK 404:NO STERILIZATION [
- Page 149 and 150:
SECTIOM 5: MARRIAGE. lSKIP501 /Have
- Page 151 and 152:
SKIP520 kow we need some detmils ab
- Page 153 and 154:
SKIP606 For how long should • cou
- Page 155 and 156:
SKIP7e9CHECK 7@8:DOES/DID NOT WORKI
- Page 157:
INTERVIEWER'S OBSERVATIONS.(To be t