12.07.2015 Views

Issues and Challenges in the Recruitment and Selection of ...

Issues and Challenges in the Recruitment and Selection of ...

Issues and Challenges in the Recruitment and Selection of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from <strong>the</strong> global race for talent, delays <strong>in</strong> validat<strong>in</strong>g qualifications, difficulties withpolice vett<strong>in</strong>g (where required) <strong>and</strong> difficulties aris<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>the</strong> policy contextparticularly with regard to <strong>the</strong> one month wait<strong>in</strong>g period to employ non EEAworkers.In brief, <strong>the</strong> two parties <strong>in</strong>volved – employers <strong>and</strong> job applicants – had divergentviews on most elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recruitment process. We need to note aga<strong>in</strong> herethat while substantial numbers <strong>of</strong> immigrant workers <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> employers wereconsulted with for this research (<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore we can have confidence <strong>in</strong> ourf<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs), <strong>the</strong> two groups are not describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir perceptions or experiences <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> same recruitment process. That is, employers are speak<strong>in</strong>g about what <strong>the</strong>ydo generally, immigrants are speak<strong>in</strong>g about what <strong>the</strong>y experience generally:we have no reason to assume that <strong>the</strong> specific immigrants we consulted had<strong>in</strong>teracted with (<strong>and</strong> are <strong>the</strong>refore describ<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>the</strong> recruitment process <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> specific employers <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> research. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, our employers weredrawn from a purposive ra<strong>the</strong>r than r<strong>and</strong>om sample <strong>and</strong> can make no claim torepresentativeness. None<strong>the</strong>less, given <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> consistency<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs, it is safe to conclude that <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong>recruitment <strong>and</strong> selection presents barriers to immigrant workers is viewed verydifferently by immigrant workers <strong>and</strong> by employers.In draw<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>the</strong> conclusions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> research, it is useful to summarise <strong>the</strong>divergent views <strong>of</strong> employers <strong>and</strong> potential employees on <strong>the</strong> different stages<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recruitment process. In Table 4.1 below <strong>the</strong> elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> recruitmentprocess are listed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> middle column, <strong>the</strong> views <strong>of</strong> immigrants regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>seare listed on <strong>the</strong> left, while those <strong>of</strong> employers are on <strong>the</strong> right. This succ<strong>in</strong>ctlyillustrates <strong>the</strong> divergent views or underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs that were identified through ourresearch.65

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!