12.07.2015 Views

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12Planning and OptimisingRadio Links12.1 Path Pr<strong>of</strong>ile PredictionThe most basic tool available to the radio planner is the path pr<strong>of</strong>ile prediction. Most <strong>of</strong>the more sophisticated tools used by the planner are extensions <strong>of</strong> this; for example,coverage predictions are only path pr<strong>of</strong>ile predictions carried out for a large number <strong>of</strong>paths.The basic path pr<strong>of</strong>ile is shown in Figure 12.1. The terrain is shown. In this case, noclutter is shown on the pr<strong>of</strong>ile, but some tools will show clutter as a coloured overlay ontop <strong>of</strong> the terrain. In all cases, the pr<strong>of</strong>ile should be along the great circle path betweenthe two points and the effective Earth radius bulge must also be included for the pathunder consideration.To this path pr<strong>of</strong>ile, we can apply a suitable propagation model, in this case ITU-RP.526, to determine the additional loss due to diffraction. This is illustrated inFigure 12.2, where a transmit antenna has been added at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the link anda receiver added at the end. The black line shows the result <strong>of</strong> applying string theoryto the path. In this case, there is double diffraction over two separate obstructions.We ned to consider the factors that need to be considered when computing thepower leaving the transmit antenna and arriving at the receiver. A typical process isshown in Table 12.1.An example <strong>of</strong> a link budget created to determine the minimum working input powerto the antenna is shown in Table 12.2.Without including the additional loss factors, a planner may conclude erroneouslythat it is acceptable to simply subtract the EIRP from the required input power into thereceiver, giving a value <strong>of</strong> 144 dB maximum allowable path loss. This would <strong>of</strong> coursebe wildly inaccurate and would lead to major problems on the ground. The difference<strong>Communications</strong>. <strong>Radar</strong> and <strong>Electronic</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>© 201 1 John Wiley & Sons. LtdAdnan Graham

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!