12.07.2015 Views

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

Communications, Radar & Electronic Warfare (201.. - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76 <strong>Communications</strong>, <strong>Radar</strong> and <strong>Electronic</strong> <strong>Warfare</strong>this case, the EblNo <strong>of</strong> approximately 4 dB for 4-QAM, 8 dB for] 6-QAM and 12 dBfor 64-QAM (as read from the graph).Let us look at an example <strong>of</strong> the effect caused by an increase in noise floor at thereceiver location. Assume that the system under consideration is a duplex (two-way)radio system with an uplink (mobile-base station) frequency <strong>of</strong>380 MHz. The mobilehas output power <strong>of</strong> 1 W and in a quiet radio environment, the base station has aworking receive sensitivity <strong>of</strong> - 86 dBm, giving a range in an urban environment <strong>of</strong>approximately 8 km. If however the noise at the base station is higher than this by8 dB, the effect is to reduce the nominal range down to approximately 5 km. If thebase station antenna is omni-directional, then this range reduction occurs in alldirections equally. The effect is illustrated in Figure 4.8. Note that in this case it is theuplink that it limited; the range <strong>of</strong> the downlink will be determined by the noisepresent at each mobile location.NOisefloordifference1JtI 1___ ___! !Low noisenomll1al ran geTransmitterHigh noisenomin al ran geFigure 4.8Diagram showing how nominal range is reduced by high noise at a base station location.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!