General Plan Update Review Committee Draft Elements Part 2 For ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

All of the intersections and roadway segments studied for the General Plan update currently have acceptable “level of service” traffic conditions, including South Mooney Boulevard (State Route 63). 4-8 VISALIA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Existing Traffic Conditions The city’s roadways were evaluated using average daily traffic (ADT) counts for the 2008 to 2010 period. Intersection facilities were evaluated for the AM and PM peak-hour using 2010 peak-hour turning movement counts. Traffic conditions and deficiencies were identified by calculating level of service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade “A” through “F” is assigned to an intersection or roadway segment representing progressively worsening traffic conditions. LOS was calculated for different intersection control types using the methods documented in the Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (HCM 2000). The previous General Plan established LOS “D” as the minimum acceptable LOS standard on city roadways. Although Caltrans has not designated a LOS standard, Caltrans’ Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002) indicates that when the LOS of a State highway facility falls below the LOS “C/D” cusp in rural areas and the LOS “D/E” cusp in urban areas, additional traffic may have a significant impact. Existing Intersection Level of Service Existing weekday AM and PM peak-hour traffic volume counts were conducted at 25 intersections and 24-hour counts were conducted on roadway segments in April 2010 while school was in session. The AM peak hour is defined as one-hour of peak traffic flow counted between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM and the PM peak hour is defined as one-hour of peak traffic flow counted between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. Table 4-3 summarizes intersection LOS and seconds of delay for the AM and PM peak hours; Table 4-4 summarizes roadway segment LOS in 2010 (the baseline year). As Table 4-3 shows, all of the 25 study intersections operate at acceptable LOS under existing conditions (2010 baseline).
Table 4-3: Existing Intersection LOS (2010) No. Intersection Control Type AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay LOS Delay LOS 1 Caldwell Avenue/Burke Street Signal 15.6 C 23.8 C 2 Caldwell Avenue/Lovers Lane Signal 18.8 B 21 C 3 Cypress Avenue/Akers Street Signal 17.6 B 34.3 C 4 Ferguson Avenue/Linwood Street AWSC 10.7 B 9 A 5 Goshen Avenue/Plaza Drive Signal 24.7 C 22.5 C 6 Hillsdale Avenue/Akers Street Signal 21.3 C 18.1 B 7 Houston Avenue/Ben Maddox way Signal 20.6 C 24 C 8 Houston Avenue/Demaree Street Signal 23.4 C 19.8 B 9 Houston Avenue/McAuliff Street Signal 20.7 C 18.2 B 10 Hurley Street/Plaza Drive Signal 6.8 A 8.9 A 11 K Avenue/Ben Maddox Way AWSC 9.5 A 13.5 B 12 K Avenue/Lovers Lane OWSC 15.4 C 17.9 C 13 Main Street/West Street Signal 6.6 A 7.1 A 14 Mineral King Avenue/Akers Street Signal 16.9 B 17.9 B 15 Noble Avenue/Akers Street Signal 14.1 B 17.5 B 16 Noble Avenue/Watson Street Signal 8.4 A 7.1 A 17 Riggin Avenue/Demaree Street Signal 17.4 B 19.8 B 18 Riggin Avenue/Dinuba Boulevard Signal 17.3 B 27.5 C 19 Riggin Avenue/Giddings Street TWSC 14.6 B 16.6 C 20 Riggin Avenue/Shirk Road AWSC 9.7 A 9.6 A 21 Tulare Avenue/Santa Fe Street AWSC 13.4 B 14.3 B 22 Visalia Road/Akers Street TWSC 16.9 C 15.6 C 23 Walnut Avenue/Shirk Road AWSC 13.3 B 15.7 C 24 Whitendale Avenue/Demaree Street Signal 8.4 A 8.9 A 25 Whitendale Avenue/Woodland Drive TWSC 11.8 B 14.5 B Legend: TWSC = Two-Way-Stop Control; AWSC = All-Way-Stop Control; OWSC = One-Way-Stop Control For Signalized Intersections Average Delay = Average Intersection Delay; For TWSC Intersections Average Delay = Worst-Case Intersection Movement Delay; For Signalized Intersections LOS = Average Intersection Level-of-Service; For TWSC Intersections LOS = Worst-Case Movement’s Level-of-Service; Warrant = MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant 3 Source: Omni-Means, 2010 DRAFT ELEMENTS For General Plan Update Review Committee AUGUST 2012 4-9
Page 1 and 2: For General Plan UPdate Committee r
Page 3 and 4: General Plan Update Review Committe
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ..
Page 7 and 8: 5 Parks, Schools, Community Facilit
Page 9 and 10: Figure 4-2e: Gateway Boulevard (6-L
Page 11 and 12: Table 4-7: Future Intersection LOS
Page 13 and 14: 4 CIRCULATION The Circulation Eleme
Page 15 and 16: • Traffic controls are incorporat
Page 17 and 18: 10 160 acres 40 Freeway Existing Ar
Page 19: Existing conditions for roadway seg
Page 23 and 24: Table 4-4: Existing Roadway Segment
Page 25 and 26: travel lane, and bike lane widths;
Page 27 and 28: Table 4-5: Planned Roadway Improvem
Page 35 and 36: Figure 4-2b shows a “green corrid
Page 37 and 38: Future Traffic Conditions The TCAG
Page 39 and 40: Source: Omni-Means, 2012 DRAFT ELEM
Page 41 and 42: Table 4-8: Future Roadway LOS (2030
Page 43 and 44: Local Systems Visalia Transit Visal
Page 45 and 46: Visalia City Coach Routes Visalia T
Page 47 and 48: All KART bus routes begin and end a
Page 49 and 50: esources, improved air quality and
Page 51 and 52: Pedestrian Circulation Walking is t
Page 53 and 54: T-P-45 Require that collector stree
Page 55 and 56: • Establish specific standards fo
Page 57 and 58: T-P-61 *Encourage high-security off
Page 59 and 60: 4.9 AVIATION Visalia owns and opera
Page 61 and 62: 6 OPEN SPACE AND CONSERVATION The O
Page 63 and 64: OSC-O-4 Create and maintain open sp
Page 65 and 66: expected to prevent further degrada
Page 67 and 68: Objectives OSC-O-6 Protect water re
Page 69 and 70: Figure 6-2: Typical Residential Sec
Page 71 and 72:
6.3 LAND RESOURCES This section con
Page 73 and 74:
Farmland Type 160 acres 10 40 Prime
Page 75 and 76:
activities, and agricultural practi
Page 77 and 78:
Mineral Resources The most economic
Page 79 and 80:
Special Status Plant Species Specia
Page 81 and 82:
Objectives OSC-O-10 Protect and enh
Page 83 and 84:
Archaeological Resources A records
Page 85 and 86:
7 AIR QUALITY & GREENHOUSE GASES 7.
Page 87 and 88:
State and national health-based amb
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7-1: State and National Crite
Page 91 and 92:
Toxic Air Contaminants The ambient
Page 93 and 94:
State and regional agencies identif
Page 95 and 96:
Global Climate Change Global climat
Page 97 and 98:
2010. If California were considered
Page 99 and 100:
Objectives AQ-O-3 *Reduce emissions
Page 101 and 102:
8 SAFETY AND NOISE The purpose of t
Page 103 and 104:
Huron Avenal 46 Kerman 269 145 33 S
Page 105 and 106:
Objectives S-O-1 Minimize risks of
Page 107 and 108:
Flooding Risks 10 160 acres 40 } 99
Page 109 and 110:
Laws and Regulations Federal and St
Page 111 and 112:
ing underground storage tanks which
Page 113 and 114:
Fire Threat 10 160 acres 40 Moderat
Page 115 and 116:
S-P-30 Assist in solving the incend
Page 117 and 118:
EMERGENCY RESPONSE In 2008, the Dep
Page 119 and 120:
S-P-39 *Continue to work with weath
Page 121 and 122:
Noise Generation in Visalia A commu
Page 123 and 124:
craft and rail transportation. Nois
Page 125 and 126:
other businesses, including a used
Page 127 and 128:
The Noise Ordinance may remain prim
Page 129 and 130:
N-P-5 Continue to enforce applicabl
Page 131 and 132:
GLOSSARY 100-Year Flood. That flood
Page 133 and 134:
Connectivity. The quality of street
Page 135 and 136:
dation, competition, or disease. Th
Page 137 and 138:
Groundwater Recharge. The natural p
Page 139 and 140:
Maximum Contaminant Level. Are stan
Page 141 and 142:
of Federal Regulations, Section 17.
Page 143 and 144:
Transportation Demand Management. M
Page 145 and 146:
cfs: Cubic feet per second CGS: Cal
Page 147:
TAZ: Traffic Analysis Zone TCAG: Tu
Page 150 and 151:
Table A-1: Contaminated Sites ID Si
Page 152 and 153:
Table B-1: Existing Traffic Noise C
Page 154 and 155:
B-4 Table B-1: Existing Traffic Noi
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
B-10 VISALIA GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Th
Page 162:
D Y E T T & B H ATIA Urban and Regi
show all

General Plan Update Review Committee Draft Elements Part 2 For ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?