operative government’. The separation of powers between the executive, legislative <strong>and</strong>judicial arms of government was institutionalised.A collection of independent institutions - including the Public Prospector, Auditor General,<strong>and</strong> Human Rights, Gender <strong>and</strong> Electoral commissions – were established in terms ofChapter 9 of the Constitution, to guard against abuses of power <strong>and</strong> protect the rights ofindividual citizens.Progress was also made toward improving the quality of life <strong>for</strong> many of the poorest SouthAfricans. Through the Reconstruction <strong>and</strong> Development Programme (RDP), the governmentrolled out a comprehensive plan to exp<strong>and</strong> access to basic amenities such as housing,water, sanitation, schooling, primary healthcare <strong>and</strong> electricity to communities that had beendenied these in the past.The programme can claim many success stories.For the first time in our history, South Africa has a comprehensive social security systemwhich serves all citizens in need, regardless of race. It features an extensive array of grantsthat provide assistance to senior citizens, the disabled, children in need, foster parents, <strong>and</strong>many others too poor to meet their basic social requirements. Millions of people’s lives havebeen changed <strong>for</strong> the better as a consequence of free healthcare programmes <strong>and</strong> freemeals at schools.However, shortly after its initial implementation, the RDP began to encounter problems.Economic challenges post-1994It became very clear very quickly that the government did not have the capacity to fullyimplement the RDP. A severe shortage of professional <strong>and</strong> project management skills in thepublic sector, coupled with inadequate resources <strong>and</strong> poor administration, resulted in everincreasingbacklogs. The new provincial administrations, only recently established, were in astate of flux, making them unreliable implementing partners.Promises soon outstripped outcomes, <strong>and</strong> a new phrase began to enter the public lexicon:service delivery failure.It also became apparent that the state did not have the money to fund the RDP’s manyinitiatives. The new government had hoped that the transition to democracy, <strong>and</strong> SouthAfrica’s welcome reception into the international community, would bring with it improvedeconomic integration, better international trade ties, much-needed <strong>for</strong>eign direct investment(FDI), <strong>and</strong> healthy GDP growth.This did not happen. Economic growth idled at 2.5%, far from the targeted 4-6%. The budgetdeficit stood at 4.3% <strong>and</strong> government debt rose to 50% of GDP. The then-Deputy PresidentThabo Mbeki, <strong>and</strong> the Finance Minister at the time, Trevor Manuel, understood that if thissituation was allowed to continue it would curtail the government’s policy options <strong>and</strong>severely limit the economy’s capacity to create opportunities <strong>for</strong> people in the long term.It became apparent that with the RDP programme, which presented a large scale fiscalspending programme aimed at improving the life of South Africa’s poorest citizens, the ANChad neglected to create a productive economic policy that would ensure the af<strong>for</strong>dability <strong>and</strong>sustainability of RDP expenditure. As a result, whilst some indicators of basic servicesimproved, poverty rates in South Africa remained broadly unchanged.21 | P a g e
Headcount poverty rate in China, India, Brazil <strong>and</strong> South Africa (%)6050403020ChinaIndiaBrazilSouth Africa1001993 2000 2008Table 1: Exp<strong>and</strong>ing economic opportunities as a result of 8% economic growth or more,coupled with rapid job creation, has seen poverty plummet in China, India <strong>and</strong> Brazil. Smartsocial policies have furthermore reduced inequality <strong>and</strong> promoted economic inclusion <strong>for</strong>millions of poor Brazilians. Poverty in South Africa remains very high. Source: OECDTo address this, Mbeki <strong>and</strong> Manuel embarked on a wide-ranging policy re<strong>for</strong>m programmecalled <strong>Growth</strong>, Employment <strong>and</strong> Redistribution (GEAR). At the heart of GEAR was anunderst<strong>and</strong>ing that the promise of 1994 could only be achieved if South Africa’s financeswere on a sure footing, <strong>and</strong> if the economy was geared toward achieving high rates ofeconomic growth, which would in turn exp<strong>and</strong> employment opportunities <strong>and</strong> grow therevenue base.Although GEAR made notable progress in areas such as budget re<strong>for</strong>m; deficit reduction; aconsistent monetary policy; <strong>and</strong> trade promotion, political pressures conspired to prevent theprogramme from being fully implemented. This was particularly evident in the failure to makesignificant gains in areas such as collective bargaining re<strong>for</strong>m; the restructuring of stateassets; tax incentives; skills development; <strong>and</strong> infrastructure investment.Nevertheless, economic growth was relatively strong during the 2000s, reaching 5.4% in2006 <strong>and</strong> 5.1% in 2007. The budget deficit also declined, <strong>and</strong> South Africa recorded asurplus in both 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007. But <strong>for</strong> millions of ordinary South African, theseimprovements in our country’s economic fundamentals remained abstract notions,unconnected to everyday reality.Poverty continued to be widespread, <strong>and</strong> many communities, especially in rural areas,continued to lack access to basic services like water, electricity, quality healthcare <strong>and</strong>education. It should be noted, though, that it was during the GEAR period that the SouthAfrican economy registered its first - <strong>and</strong> only - significant decline in unemployment since1994.22 | P a g e