FISCAL AND MONETARY POLICY PRIORITIESGetting fiscal policy rightThe DA’s plan to break down barriers <strong>and</strong> build a high-growth, stakeholder economy will onlywork in a stable <strong>and</strong> supportive macroeconomic environment. Accordingly, our approach tomacroeconomic policy is to get fiscal <strong>and</strong> monetary fundamentals right, <strong>and</strong> to moderate theshort-term fluctuations in growth that drive the business cycle.Our fiscal policy position is updated each year with the publication of our Alternative Budgetshortly be<strong>for</strong>e the national Minister of Finance tables his Budget. The budget framework ofrecent Alternative Budgets reflects four main trends in tax policy.First, tax policy should also support a healthy financial system that meets the needs ofsavers <strong>and</strong> borrowers while providing capital to support growth. In this regard we generallypropose a reduction in taxes on savings <strong>and</strong> investment.Second, we maintain that tax policy has a key role to play in driving economic growth so wepropose appropriate cuts in corporate <strong>and</strong> business taxes to enhance the competitiveness ofSouth African businesses.Third, we believe that payroll taxes are a contributing factor to our stubbornly highunemployment rate <strong>and</strong> should there<strong>for</strong>e be reduced over the medium term.Fourth, because of economies of scale in investment <strong>and</strong> the disproportionate share ofwealth that accrues to high income earners, we support the progressive nature of taxationestablished under the current government.We note, however, that the top rates of personal income tax are high relative to ourinternational competitors, <strong>and</strong> kick in at a lower rate. We maintain, there<strong>for</strong>e, that there is nospace to adjust these in favour of SARS in the medium term.On the expenditure side there are also several trends that characterise the DA’s fiscaloutlook as indicated in each Alternative Budget. It is important that the budget framework, <strong>for</strong>example, does not threaten our fiscal health, hence we have tabled proposals to constrainour debt-to-GDP ratio to no higher than 40% over the medium term.Moreover, the current government's failure to ring fence dedicated revenues is short-sighted.We believe that it is appropriate <strong>and</strong> just to ring fence certain taxes to ensure that taxpayersget what they pay <strong>for</strong>.Recent examples that highlight this include the debacle around e-tolling in Gauteng wherethe DA has supported the ring-fencing of the fuel levy to pay <strong>for</strong> road infrastructure, <strong>and</strong> thecarbon tax of 2010 which the DA maintained should be ring fenced <strong>for</strong> expenditure oncarbon-mitigation.Several core principles underpin each of the DA’s Alternative Budgets. These are:Policy certainty: One of the consequences of the ideological factionalism in theANC is the lack of certainty around economic policy. Ministers from variousideological backgrounds table contradictory policy documents <strong>and</strong> implementation isblocked by shifting factions at Cabinet level. While the New <strong>Growth</strong> Path posits abigger role <strong>for</strong> the state in the economy, the National Development <strong>Plan</strong> takes theopposite view. A DA government would speak with one voice on the economy.35 | P a g e
Fiscal sustainability: While National Treasury’s major success in the past 15 yearshas been the drawing down of apartheid debt <strong>and</strong> the consolidation of fiscal policy,the ANC’s alliance partners are constantly lobbying <strong>for</strong> fiscal expansion, regardlessof where we are in the business cycle. The risk of them getting their way is becomingincreasingly dangerous as the debt-to-GDP ratio is set to approach 40% in themedium term. A DA government would hold the fiscal line in the face of populistpressure <strong>and</strong> run a counter-cyclical fiscal policy to lessen the impact of downturns.The long term objective will be two-fold: First, to reduce the participation of the statein the economy <strong>and</strong> to ensure that fiscal spending does not affect price levels, orcrowd-out household <strong>and</strong> corporate expenditure. Spending should be limited to theresources required <strong>for</strong> ensuring that the public sector creates the environmentnecessary <strong>for</strong> the economy to grow. Second, fiscal expansion should, wherepossible, be limited to situations where projects can achieve significant boosts ineconomic growth, to ensure that future generations are not burdened with today’scosts without significant benefits. In order to achieve this, we would entrench limitson fiscal expansion, using mechanisms such as the Swiss <strong>and</strong> German constitutionallimitations on structural deficits, which link the government’s ability to exp<strong>and</strong>expenditure with key debt-to-output measures. .Revenue through growth not increased taxation: Unlike its counterparts in Brazil<strong>and</strong> India, the National Treasury has failed to express a compelling growth narrative<strong>for</strong> South Africa, <strong>and</strong> our country has consequently lost out on the revenue benefitsof faster growth. Instead, the Treasury seems to be casting around <strong>for</strong> new taxes toimpose. South Africans are already taxed at an extremely high rate relative to otheremerging markets so proposed carbon taxes, local business taxes or increases inVAT, payroll or income tax increases to fund the proposed National Health Insurancescheme would leave us heavily overtaxed, ultimately constraining growth <strong>and</strong> jobcreation. A DA government would raise revenue by driving growth, not by raising newtaxes.Tax breaks to drive new investment: The National Treasury has long had anaversion to using tax incentives to drive the changes we need to see in the economy.In contrast, a DA government would introduce billions of r<strong>and</strong>s worth of tax breaks toincentivise savings, job creation, broad-based share ownership <strong>and</strong> small businessdevelopment.Tax decentralisation: The DA proposes a review of the funding mechanisms <strong>for</strong>local government that would provide local government with a better range of taxincome streams under its own control <strong>and</strong> which could be implemented according tolocal circumstances. Any new taxes introduced to fund local government would haveto be matched by reductions in national taxes. Under the current system, the taxationpowers of local governments are limited to property rates, service charges <strong>and</strong> levieson service charges (grants are provided from the national fiscus, but these are oftenunreliable). This restricts their ability to respond to the needs of economicdevelopment at a local level. Furthermore, variable local taxation would enhancecompetition between municipalities from a cost/benefit perspective, with better runmunicipalities being rewarded with greater economic activity by corporate <strong>and</strong> privatecitizens, enhancing the ability of governments to deliver services in a manner that isaccountable <strong>and</strong> responsive.Cut waste <strong>and</strong> streamline government: Government has become excessivelywasteful <strong>and</strong> bloated under the ANC. The Auditor General identified R20bn worth ofwasteful expenditure in 2010/11 alone. In addition, budget allocations to the36 | P a g e