LAWRENCE EDET NSA - St Clements University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

4.19 Project monitoring and evaluation 160 4.20 Assessment of project completion rate 160 4.21 Factors affecting R&D management 166 4.22 Networking with technology providers and Industry 171 4.23 Communication on R&D among scientists 172 4.24 Availability of R&D policy 174 5.1 Impact of funding on RTOs performance 191 5.2A Comparative assessment of core management processes of RTOs 200 5.2B Expected frequencies 200 5.3A Observed frequencies 213 5.3B Expected frequencies and Chi-square determination 213 xii
LIST OF FIGURES xiii Page 4.1 Distribution of responses on institutional bases 115 4.2 Ownership of RTOs in Nigeria 117 4.3 Legal structure of RTOs surveyed 118 4.4 Level of autonomy of RTOs in Nigeria 121 4.5 Prospects of changing management 123 4.6 Level of financial support by government to RTOs 129 4.7 Decision on service type offered by RTOs 133 4.8 Illustration of the availability of business unit 142 4.9 Illustration of RTOs focal point activities 143 4.10 Illustration of the organizational management style of RTOs 146 4.11 Illustration of responses to attribute analysis by RTOs 148 4.12 Organizational attributes 149 4.13 Illustration of performance rating of RTOs 153 4.14 Performance information requirement 156 4.15 Fishbone diagram of the obstacles to R&D management 165
Page 1 and 2: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF RE
Page 3 and 4: AUGUST, 2003 DECLARATION I hereby d
Page 5 and 6: DEDICATION I dedicate this research
Page 7 and 8: LAWRENCE EDET NSA ABSTRACT This stu
Page 9 and 10: Chapter Two: Literature Review 20 2
Page 11: Bibliography 241 Appendices 249 LIS
Page 15 and 16: LIST OF BOXES xv Page 1. Governance
Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGR
Page 19 and 20: Realizing the limitations of the NC
Page 21 and 22: specific areas that include, the ne
Page 23 and 24: 1.2 STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBL
Page 25 and 26: The essence of this study is to ass
Page 27 and 28: practices are most successful in me
Page 29 and 30: problems to an R & D mission. It wi
Page 31 and 32: 1.5 STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS For the
Page 33 and 34: an RTO into major process areas was
Page 35 and 36: REFERENCE Aluko-Olokun, I. The Way
Page 37 and 38: forestry resources as well as solid
Page 39 and 40: It is therefore, not the problem of
Page 41 and 42: are equally believed to contribute
Page 43 and 44: * Funding Structure - programmes an
Page 45 and 46: � Balancing efficiency, effective
Page 47 and 48: � Tendency towards more rigid per
Page 49 and 50: cultures are typified by a set of s
Page 51 and 52: Organizational effectiveness leads
Page 53 and 54: For many organizations, the “old
Page 55 and 56: goals, objectives, strategies and p
Page 57 and 58: 2002). Organizational culture plays
Page 59 and 60: local raw materials as input to man
Page 61 and 62: industrial development and were ful
Page 63 and 64:
force in research is accountability
Page 65 and 66:
This historical review of the inabi
Page 67 and 68:
and not to the users of their R & D
Page 69 and 70:
linkages should be forged between r
Page 71 and 72:
capacity and relies almost entirely
Page 73 and 74:
In discussing these critical areas,
Page 75 and 76:
RTOs were based. While the system r
Page 77 and 78:
Consequently, management of researc
Page 79 and 80:
This implies that in future, partne
Page 81 and 82:
society (WAITRO, 1999). Hence, the
Page 83 and 84:
of their group and meet their highe
Page 85 and 86:
Bozeman and Rogers (2002) in their
Page 87 and 88:
and preference functions. Evaluatin
Page 89 and 90:
conditions is desirable. This will
Page 91 and 92:
governments establish a market-orie
Page 93 and 94:
Capability Building and Project Man
Page 95 and 96:
other scientists and their willingn
Page 97 and 98:
organization, a data base system is
Page 99 and 100:
exploit new technologies and busine
Page 101 and 102:
In addition to the use of the above
Page 103 and 104:
the same field within the same set
Page 105 and 106:
process; funding structure; linking
Page 107 and 108:
9. Basant, R. and P, Chandra. “Bu
Page 109 and 110:
27. Kumar, U. and U. Kumar “Incub
Page 111 and 112:
43. Rush, H, M, Hobday., J, Bessant
Page 113 and 114:
contribution to the growth of Niger
Page 115 and 116:
work for the organization and the c
Page 117 and 118:
The essence of the open-ended quest
Page 119 and 120:
� Respondents were also asked to
Page 121 and 122:
and effects of activities embarked
Page 123 and 124:
Quantitative descriptive analysis w
Page 125 and 126:
Apart from the assessment of manage
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 4.1 LIST OF MAJOR RESEARCH AN
Page 129 and 130:
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Cocoa R
Page 131 and 132:
The analysis and distribution patte
Page 133 and 134:
Ownership Govt. Private 4.2 MANAGEM
Page 135 and 136:
It was obvious from this analysis t
Page 137 and 138:
Type of Autonomy On the level of au
Page 139 and 140:
When asked of the prospects to chan
Page 141 and 142:
Model A: GOVERNANCE Box 1 The Proce
Page 143 and 144:
� The mandate, mission and vision
Page 145 and 146:
Level of funding S/N Level of Finan
Page 147 and 148:
controls. The majority of responden
Page 149 and 150:
The respondents were asked whether
Page 151 and 152:
Model of management practices as it
Page 153 and 154:
4.5 CLIENT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Res
Page 155 and 156:
explained that they do encourage gr
Page 157 and 158:
development. (Table 4.11 and Figure
Page 159 and 160:
Focal Point activities C. Revenue G
Page 161 and 162:
delegation of responsibilities is t
Page 163 and 164:
In view of the increasing need for
Page 165 and 166:
Risk taking (Change) Threats (SWOT)
Page 167 and 168:
Opportunities that are available to
Page 169 and 170:
S/No Performance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 V
Page 171 and 172:
aising programmes. Prospective info
Page 173 and 174:
identified when users indicated tha
Page 175 and 176:
and field of specialization determi
Page 177 and 178:
The responses to this question were
Page 179 and 180:
Managers should be given the author
Page 181 and 182:
Lack of technicians Managerial skil
Page 183 and 184:
Obstacles to R&D Poor Funding Lack
Page 185 and 186:
Furthermore, the recruitment system
Page 187 and 188:
To appreciate these obvious issues,
Page 189 and 190:
Communication on R&D Scientists in
Page 191 and 192:
programmes that can help them meet
Page 193 and 194:
5.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER FIVE DISCU
Page 195 and 196:
LIMITED NETWORK - Collaborators - P
Page 197 and 198:
Also, network from the responses it
Page 199 and 200:
objectives (Ohaba, 2001: 195-6). Oh
Page 201 and 202:
accorded to senior management staff
Page 203 and 204:
globally for successful performance
Page 205 and 206:
traditional R&D management approach
Page 207 and 208:
Testing of Hypothesis on Funding of
Page 209 and 210:
Decision Rule We reject Ho at = 0.0
Page 211 and 212:
this study which indicate limited i
Page 213 and 214:
practice whereby the supervising Mi
Page 215 and 216:
improved and quality services have
Page 217 and 218:
nc Using the eqn. X 2 = (Observed-E
Page 219 and 220:
of fund outside government and info
Page 221 and 222:
� Leaders of organizations should
Page 223 and 224:
� Acceptance - the extent to whic
Page 225 and 226:
time frame and budget. Apart from t
Page 227 and 228:
The quality of R&D of RTOs, which t
Page 229 and 230:
Response Agric S & T RTOs Total Yes
Page 231 and 232:
Recruitment however, should be a co
Page 233 and 234:
potential client industry and the R
Page 235 and 236:
7. Chiang, J. S. “From Industry T
Page 237 and 238:
CHAPTER SIX SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CO
Page 239 and 240:
5. The current structure of RTOs li
Page 241 and 242:
11. Performance information which i
Page 243 and 244:
15. It was established from this st
Page 245 and 246:
significant increase in their earni
Page 247 and 248:
These outputs cannot be easily asso
Page 249 and 250:
Based on the answers to these quest
Page 251 and 252:
Lack of satisfactory working condit
Page 253 and 254:
of government. Government should pu
Page 255 and 256:
environments that stress short-term
Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerman, R. G. “Wal
Page 259 and 260:
Boyett, J. and Jimmie Boyett The Gu
Page 261 and 262:
Herrera, A. Social Determinants of
Page 263 and 264:
Pack, H. and L. E. Westphal. “Ind
Page 265 and 266:
Appendix 1 QUESTIONNAIRE This Quest
Page 267 and 268:
2.2 GOVERNMENT SUPPORT: Does govern
Page 269 and 270:
and successes, including your failu
Page 271 and 272:
Information Across the management C
Page 273 and 274:
6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6.1 PROJECT
Page 275 and 276:
6.9 What were your sources of resea
Page 277 and 278:
8.7 STAFF EVALUATION: How often do
Page 279 and 280:
Appendix 2 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Page 281:
9. Federal School of Wildlife Manag
show all

LAWRENCE EDET NSA - St Clements University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?