- Page 1 and 2: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT OF RE
- Page 3 and 4: AUGUST, 2003 DECLARATION I hereby d
- Page 5 and 6: DEDICATION I dedicate this research
- Page 7 and 8: LAWRENCE EDET NSA ABSTRACT This stu
- Page 9 and 10: Chapter Two: Literature Review 20 2
- Page 11 and 12: Bibliography 241 Appendices 249 LIS
- Page 13 and 14: LIST OF FIGURES xiii Page 4.1 Distr
- Page 15 and 16: LIST OF BOXES xv Page 1. Governance
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGR
- Page 19 and 20: Realizing the limitations of the NC
- Page 21 and 22: specific areas that include, the ne
- Page 23 and 24: 1.2 STATEMENT OF THE RESEARCH PROBL
- Page 25 and 26: The essence of this study is to ass
- Page 27 and 28: practices are most successful in me
- Page 29: problems to an R & D mission. It wi
- Page 33 and 34: an RTO into major process areas was
- Page 35 and 36: REFERENCE Aluko-Olokun, I. The Way
- Page 37 and 38: forestry resources as well as solid
- Page 39 and 40: It is therefore, not the problem of
- Page 41 and 42: are equally believed to contribute
- Page 43 and 44: * Funding Structure - programmes an
- Page 45 and 46: � Balancing efficiency, effective
- Page 47 and 48: � Tendency towards more rigid per
- Page 49 and 50: cultures are typified by a set of s
- Page 51 and 52: Organizational effectiveness leads
- Page 53 and 54: For many organizations, the “old
- Page 55 and 56: goals, objectives, strategies and p
- Page 57 and 58: 2002). Organizational culture plays
- Page 59 and 60: local raw materials as input to man
- Page 61 and 62: industrial development and were ful
- Page 63 and 64: force in research is accountability
- Page 65 and 66: This historical review of the inabi
- Page 67 and 68: and not to the users of their R & D
- Page 69 and 70: linkages should be forged between r
- Page 71 and 72: capacity and relies almost entirely
- Page 73 and 74: In discussing these critical areas,
- Page 75 and 76: RTOs were based. While the system r
- Page 77 and 78: Consequently, management of researc
- Page 79 and 80: This implies that in future, partne
- Page 81 and 82:
society (WAITRO, 1999). Hence, the
- Page 83 and 84:
of their group and meet their highe
- Page 85 and 86:
Bozeman and Rogers (2002) in their
- Page 87 and 88:
and preference functions. Evaluatin
- Page 89 and 90:
conditions is desirable. This will
- Page 91 and 92:
governments establish a market-orie
- Page 93 and 94:
Capability Building and Project Man
- Page 95 and 96:
other scientists and their willingn
- Page 97 and 98:
organization, a data base system is
- Page 99 and 100:
exploit new technologies and busine
- Page 101 and 102:
In addition to the use of the above
- Page 103 and 104:
the same field within the same set
- Page 105 and 106:
process; funding structure; linking
- Page 107 and 108:
9. Basant, R. and P, Chandra. “Bu
- Page 109 and 110:
27. Kumar, U. and U. Kumar “Incub
- Page 111 and 112:
43. Rush, H, M, Hobday., J, Bessant
- Page 113 and 114:
contribution to the growth of Niger
- Page 115 and 116:
work for the organization and the c
- Page 117 and 118:
The essence of the open-ended quest
- Page 119 and 120:
� Respondents were also asked to
- Page 121 and 122:
and effects of activities embarked
- Page 123 and 124:
Quantitative descriptive analysis w
- Page 125 and 126:
Apart from the assessment of manage
- Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 4.1 LIST OF MAJOR RESEARCH AN
- Page 129 and 130:
15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. Cocoa R
- Page 131 and 132:
The analysis and distribution patte
- Page 133 and 134:
Ownership Govt. Private 4.2 MANAGEM
- Page 135 and 136:
It was obvious from this analysis t
- Page 137 and 138:
Type of Autonomy On the level of au
- Page 139 and 140:
When asked of the prospects to chan
- Page 141 and 142:
Model A: GOVERNANCE Box 1 The Proce
- Page 143 and 144:
� The mandate, mission and vision
- Page 145 and 146:
Level of funding S/N Level of Finan
- Page 147 and 148:
controls. The majority of responden
- Page 149 and 150:
The respondents were asked whether
- Page 151 and 152:
Model of management practices as it
- Page 153 and 154:
4.5 CLIENT BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT Res
- Page 155 and 156:
explained that they do encourage gr
- Page 157 and 158:
development. (Table 4.11 and Figure
- Page 159 and 160:
Focal Point activities C. Revenue G
- Page 161 and 162:
delegation of responsibilities is t
- Page 163 and 164:
In view of the increasing need for
- Page 165 and 166:
Risk taking (Change) Threats (SWOT)
- Page 167 and 168:
Opportunities that are available to
- Page 169 and 170:
S/No Performance Rating 1 2 3 4 5 V
- Page 171 and 172:
aising programmes. Prospective info
- Page 173 and 174:
identified when users indicated tha
- Page 175 and 176:
and field of specialization determi
- Page 177 and 178:
The responses to this question were
- Page 179 and 180:
Managers should be given the author
- Page 181 and 182:
Lack of technicians Managerial skil
- Page 183 and 184:
Obstacles to R&D Poor Funding Lack
- Page 185 and 186:
Furthermore, the recruitment system
- Page 187 and 188:
To appreciate these obvious issues,
- Page 189 and 190:
Communication on R&D Scientists in
- Page 191 and 192:
programmes that can help them meet
- Page 193 and 194:
5.1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER FIVE DISCU
- Page 195 and 196:
LIMITED NETWORK - Collaborators - P
- Page 197 and 198:
Also, network from the responses it
- Page 199 and 200:
objectives (Ohaba, 2001: 195-6). Oh
- Page 201 and 202:
accorded to senior management staff
- Page 203 and 204:
globally for successful performance
- Page 205 and 206:
traditional R&D management approach
- Page 207 and 208:
Testing of Hypothesis on Funding of
- Page 209 and 210:
Decision Rule We reject Ho at = 0.0
- Page 211 and 212:
this study which indicate limited i
- Page 213 and 214:
practice whereby the supervising Mi
- Page 215 and 216:
improved and quality services have
- Page 217 and 218:
nc Using the eqn. X 2 = (Observed-E
- Page 219 and 220:
of fund outside government and info
- Page 221 and 222:
� Leaders of organizations should
- Page 223 and 224:
� Acceptance - the extent to whic
- Page 225 and 226:
time frame and budget. Apart from t
- Page 227 and 228:
The quality of R&D of RTOs, which t
- Page 229 and 230:
Response Agric S & T RTOs Total Yes
- Page 231 and 232:
Recruitment however, should be a co
- Page 233 and 234:
potential client industry and the R
- Page 235 and 236:
7. Chiang, J. S. “From Industry T
- Page 237 and 238:
CHAPTER SIX SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CO
- Page 239 and 240:
5. The current structure of RTOs li
- Page 241 and 242:
11. Performance information which i
- Page 243 and 244:
15. It was established from this st
- Page 245 and 246:
significant increase in their earni
- Page 247 and 248:
These outputs cannot be easily asso
- Page 249 and 250:
Based on the answers to these quest
- Page 251 and 252:
Lack of satisfactory working condit
- Page 253 and 254:
of government. Government should pu
- Page 255 and 256:
environments that stress short-term
- Page 257 and 258:
BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerman, R. G. “Wal
- Page 259 and 260:
Boyett, J. and Jimmie Boyett The Gu
- Page 261 and 262:
Herrera, A. Social Determinants of
- Page 263 and 264:
Pack, H. and L. E. Westphal. “Ind
- Page 265 and 266:
Appendix 1 QUESTIONNAIRE This Quest
- Page 267 and 268:
2.2 GOVERNMENT SUPPORT: Does govern
- Page 269 and 270:
and successes, including your failu
- Page 271 and 272:
Information Across the management C
- Page 273 and 274:
6.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 6.1 PROJECT
- Page 275 and 276:
6.9 What were your sources of resea
- Page 277 and 278:
8.7 STAFF EVALUATION: How often do
- Page 279 and 280:
Appendix 2 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
- Page 281:
9. Federal School of Wildlife Manag