13.07.2015 Views

1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council

1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council

1.2 Purpose of this waste assessment - Waikato District Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

surveys at least three months apart to allow for seasonal variation – although it could be argued <strong>this</strong> would bemore accurately measured if surveys were required to be five - six months apart.The users <strong>of</strong> SWAP surveys, and UEFs, are required to re-establish the composition <strong>of</strong> each <strong>waste</strong> source at 10yearly intervals.DFOs that reduce their methane emissions to the atmosphere by flaring or through energy production carryout a net methane calculation. Once again, these DFOs need to apply for a UEF. DFOs are required tocalculate their own efficiency rate <strong>of</strong> methane collection and destruction. These calculations must incorporatean assumption that 10 per cent <strong>of</strong> methane in a capped landfill is oxidised to CO2 before being emitted to theatmosphere (although the TAG report notes that DFOs could apply to calculate their own unique oxidationfactor).A.2.4.6NZ Waste Strategy targetsThe revised NZWS was released in October 2010. The new strategy adopts two <strong>of</strong> the three overarchinggoals from the previous (2002) NZWS. These are:1. Reducing the harmful effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>waste</strong>2. Improving the efficiency <strong>of</strong> resource useThe NZWS 2010 is a departure from the previous strategy in that it has moved away from an overarchingobjective <strong>of</strong> zero <strong>waste</strong>, and that it does not present any specific targets for <strong>waste</strong> minimisation.The intent <strong>of</strong> the 2010 strategy is to enable a more flexible approach to <strong>waste</strong> management and encouragedevelopment <strong>of</strong> locally-appropriate targets and solutions, and to efficiently allocate <strong>waste</strong> management andminimisation effort and resources.A.2.5Changes in lifestyles and consumptionHousehold <strong>waste</strong> growth is not just a New Zealand phenomenon. In 1997 OECD countries produced 540million tonnes <strong>of</strong> MSW annually (approximately 500kg per person). Waste grew at an average annual rate <strong>of</strong>1.8 per cent between 1980 and 1985, 3.6 per cent between 1985 and 1990, and 1 per cent between 1990 and1997 23 . A report by the OECD 24 noted the following driving forces behind current and projected householdconsumption patterns:1. Rising per capita income2. Demographics (more working women, more single person households, larger retirement population)3. Accompanying changes in lifestyles leading to individualised buying patterns4. Shift towards more processed and packaged products5. Higher levels <strong>of</strong> appliance ownership6. Wider use <strong>of</strong> services and recreation7. Technology8. Institutions and infrastructure that create the prevailing conditions faced by householders23 Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD Countries, OECD 2002, p 5324 Ibid, p12.<strong>Waikato</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Council</strong> <strong>waste</strong> <strong>assessment</strong> 201159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!