2011 - St. Louis County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

443PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTArecording fee of $46; for a total of $375.85, to be deposited into Fund 240 (Forfeited TaxFund).Adopted December 20, 2011. No. 653WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 282.241 provides that state tax forfeited land may be repurchasedby the previous owners at the time of forfeiture, or the owner’s heirs, devisees,representatives, or mortgagees, subject to payment of delinquent taxes and assessments, withpenalties, costs, and interest; andWHEREAS, the applicant, the Estate of Wayne H. Putnam and Susanne M. Putnam of NewYork, NY, has applied to repurchase state tax forfeited land legally described as:TOWN OF MIDWAYN 300 FT OF S 1030 FT OF W 1000 FT OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4, alsoN 229 31/100 FT OF S 730 FT OF W 450 69/100 FT OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4SEC 29 TWP 49 RGE 15Parcel Codes: 450-0010-04135, 450-0010-04142WHEREAS, the applicant was the owner, the owner’s heir, devisee, representative ormortgagee at the time of forfeiture and is eligible to repurchase the property; andWHEREAS, approving the repurchase will correct undue hardship and promote the use oflands that will best serve the public interest.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis County Board approves therepurchase application by the Estate of Wayne H. Putnam and Susanne M. Putnam of NewYork, NY, on file in County Board File No. 59199, subject to payments including total taxesand assessments of $8,899.11, service fee of $114, deed tax of $28.82, deed fee of $25,recording fee of $46, and maintenance costs of $4,490; for a total of $13,602.93, to bedeposited into Fund 240 (Forfeited Tax Fund).Adopted December 20, 2011. No. 654WHEREAS, Potlatch Corporation has requested a non-exclusive roadway and utilityeasement across state tax forfeited land to access private land; andWHEREAS, there are no reasonable alternatives to obtain access to Potlatch lands; andWHEREAS, exercising the easement will not cause significant adverse environmental ornatural resource management impacts; andWHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 282.04, Subd. 4(a), allows for the granting of private easementsacross state tax forfeited land for such purposes.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis County Auditor, pursuant toMinn. Stat. § 282.04, Subd. 4(a), is authorized to grant a non-exclusive easement across statetax forfeited lands to Potlatch Corporation described as follows:A 33 foot wide easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes centered overand across an existing road in the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter,Section 23, Township 52 North, Range 17 West, and the Southwest Quarter ofthe Southeast Quarter, Section 23, Township 52 North, Range 17 West, St.Louis County, Minnesota, being 16.5 feet on each side of the following describedcenterline:Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 27, Township 52 North, Range17 West; thence North 83 Degrees 39 Minutes 19 Seconds East for 2708.11feet; (assuming a line between the East Quarter Corner of Section 27, Township52 North, Range 17 West and the Northeast Corner of Section 27, Township 52North, Range 17 West bears North 01 Degrees 24 Minutes 55 Seconds West) tothe point of beginning;thence North 18 Degrees 19 Minutes 09 Seconds East for 196.53 feet;thence North 12 Degrees 53 Minutes 21 Seconds West for 70.87 feet;
PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA444thence North 30 Degrees 09 Minutes 50 Seconds West for 96.46 feet;thence North 49 Degrees 57 Minutes 46 Seconds West for 153.05 feet;thence North 56 Degrees 31 Minutes 03 Seconds West for 317.09 feet;thence North 51 Degrees 22 Minutes 21 Seconds West for 87.91 feet;thence North 38 Degrees 12 Minutes 59 Seconds West for 189.86 feet;thence North 17 Degrees 09 Minutes 36 Seconds West for 102.22 feet;thence North 02 Degrees 07 Minutes 07 Seconds East for 62.96 feet;thence North 17 Degrees 52 Minutes 48 Seconds East for 55.17 feet, to theNorth line of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 23,Township 52 North, Range 17 West and there said easement terminating. Thesidelines of said easement to be lengthened or shortened to meet and terminateat said North line.A 33 foot wide easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes centered overand across an existing road in the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter,Section 23, Township 52 North, Range 17 West, St. Louis County, Minnesota,being 16.5 feet on each side of the following described centerline:Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Section 27, Township 52 North, Range17 West; thence North 73 Degrees 51 Minutes 37 Seconds East for 5063.51feet; (assuming a line between the East Quarter Corner of Section 27, Township52 North, Range 17 West and the Northeast Corner of Section 27, Township 52North, Range 17 West bears North 01 Degrees 24 Minutes 54 Seconds West) tothe point of beginning;thence North 35 Degrees 11 Minutes 19 Seconds East for 94.46 feet;thence North 24 Degrees 57 Minutes 34 Seconds East for 78.12 feet;thence North 04 Degrees 32 Minutes 00 Seconds East for 130.10 feet;thence North 10 Degrees 09 Minutes 40 Seconds East for 124.58 feet;thence North 15 Degrees 15 Minutes 46 Seconds East for 268.74 feet;thence North 07 Degrees 10 Minutes 58 Seconds East for 367.99 feet;thence North 19 Degrees 32 Minutes 17 Seconds West for 219.27 feet;thence North 42 Degrees 03 Minutes 03 Seconds West for 7.60 feet, to theNorth line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23,Township 52 North, Range 17 West and there said easement terminating. Thesidelines of said easement to be lengthened or shortened to meet and terminateat said North line.RESOLVED FURTHER, that the granting of this easement is conditioned upon St. LouisCounty receiving an easement from Potlatch Corporation in Section 12, Township 52 North,Range 17 West, and Section 27, Township 52 North, Range 19 West.Adopted December 20, 2011. No. 655WHEREAS, state tax forfeited land on public waters containing greater than 150 feet ofwater frontage cannot be sold without special legislation from the State of Minnesota; andWHEREAS, state tax forfeited land cannot be sold by special private sale to resolveoccupancy trespasses without special legislation from the State of Minnesota; andWHEREAS, St. Louis County’s best interest would be served from a land management pointof view if these parcels are released for sale.NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the St. Louis County Board supportslegislation enabling the sale of state tax forfeited land described in County Board File No.59371.Adopted December 20, 2011. No. 656WHEREAS, the St. Louis County Public Works Department plans to reclaim and overlay a
Page 1 and 2:
OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGSOF THEBOARD OF
Page 3 and 4:
PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMM
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
32PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY CO
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
7. Dale and Gerri Bowman, 3099 Burn
Page 223 and 224:
Case No. 18, Jeff Musburger, P.O. B
Page 225 and 226:
uilding is currently being renovate
Page 227 and 228:
assessment values. After lengthy di
Page 229 and 230:
ecommends a $34,900 reduction to th
Page 231 and 232:
value and Mr. Hughes requested cons
Page 233 and 234:
Lavell, Leiding, Linden Grove, McDa
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
291PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY C
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Attest:PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUN
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398: 393PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY C
Page 399 and 400: 395PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY C
Page 401 and 402: OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGSOF THEBOARD OF
Page 403 and 404: PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMM
Page 447: PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMM
Page 461: PROCEEDINGS OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMM
show all

2011 - St. Louis County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?