13.07.2015 Views

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

124 COUNTERREGULATORY DEFICIENCIES IN DIABETESHypothalamusPituitary glandGrowth hormoneAutonomic Nervous SystemACTHPancreasAdrenalglandCortisolGlucagonNorep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>eEp<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>eFigure 6.4The bra<strong>in</strong> is the key regulatory organ <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> glucose counterregulationthe prevail<strong>in</strong>g quality of glycaemic control. They do not appear, however, to be <strong>in</strong>fluencedby the rate of fall of blood glucose with<strong>in</strong> the hyper- or euglycaemic range.The key organ <strong>in</strong> coord<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the hormonal and other responses to hypoglycaemia isthe bra<strong>in</strong>. Although numerous neural areas have been proposed as the control centres forcounterregulation, it is likely that neurones located with<strong>in</strong> the ventro-medial nuclei of thehypothalamus are essential for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g the hormonal responses to a fall <strong>in</strong> peripheralblood glucose (Borg et al., 1994), possibly via ATP-sensitive K+ channels (McCrimmonet al., 2005), although other glucoreceptors outside the bra<strong>in</strong> are <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g thecounterregulatory responses, most notably with<strong>in</strong> the liver (Smith et al., 2002). Althoughthe bra<strong>in</strong> was once thought to be <strong>in</strong>sensitive to <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>, there is cl<strong>in</strong>ical evidence to suggestthat <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> can act on the central nervous system (CNS) to <strong>in</strong>fluence the physiologicalresponses to hypoglycaemia (Kerr et al., 1991). Recently, <strong>in</strong> studies us<strong>in</strong>g bra<strong>in</strong>/neuronal<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> receptor knockout mice (i.e., mice with absent <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> receptor prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the bra<strong>in</strong>),the <strong>in</strong>duction of hypoglycaemia was associated with an attenuated ep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>e and an almostcompletely absent norep<strong>in</strong>ephr<strong>in</strong>e response, although glucagon release was unaffected whencompared to control animals. Therefore it appears that <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> has a role <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g theCNS aga<strong>in</strong>st hypoglycaemia (Fisher et al., 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!