13.07.2015 Views

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

252 HYPOGLYCAEMIA IN TYPE 2 DIABETES AND IN ELDERLY PEOPLEAfrican-Americans (Miller et al., 2001). A quarter of the group had experienced at leastone episode of hypoglycaemia dur<strong>in</strong>g the study period. The prevalence of hypoglycaemia<strong>in</strong>creased with more <strong>in</strong>tensive treatment, the highest rate be<strong>in</strong>g associated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>.Severe hypoglycaemia occurred <strong>in</strong> 0.5% of patients, all of whom had been treated with<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>. However, this study is limited by its reliance on patient recall of hypoglycaemia andthe ethnicity and gender of the study group, which makes it impossible to extrapolate theoutcomes to European populations.A 12-month prospective multicentre British study tested the hypothesis that the riskof hypoglycaemia <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treated type 2 diabetes of short duration iscomparable to those tak<strong>in</strong>g sulphonylureas and is lower than <strong>in</strong> patients with newly diagnosedtype 1 diabetes (UK <strong>Hypoglycaemia</strong> Study Group, 2007). Monthly questionnaires were usedto record self-reported hypoglycaemia and a 72-hour period of cont<strong>in</strong>uous blood glucosemonitor<strong>in</strong>g was used at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and end of the study period to detect asymptomatichypoglycaemia. No difference was observed <strong>in</strong> the prevalences of severe hypoglycaemia<strong>in</strong> those with type 2 diabetes treated with sulphonylureas, and <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with type 2diabetes treated with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> for less than two years (7% <strong>in</strong> both groups). Symptomatichypoglycaemia <strong>in</strong> patients with type 2 diabetes recently commenced on <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy(< 2 years) was considerably lower than <strong>in</strong> those with type 1 diabetes of less than five yearsduration (median rate one versus 22 episodes per subject per year, p 5 years, show<strong>in</strong>g a significantly higherprevalence <strong>in</strong> those with a longer duration of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy.1.0Proportion report<strong>in</strong>g at least one servere hypo0.80.60.40.20.0type 2 treatedwithsulphonylureastype2 < 2 yrs<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>type2 > 5 yrs<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>type1 < 5 yrs<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>type1 > 15 yrs<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>Figure 11.3 Proportion of patients with type 1 diabetes for < 5 years and > 15 years, and type2 diabetes <strong>in</strong> different treatment groups (sulphonylureas, <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> < 2 years, <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> > 5 years), whoexperienced one or more episodes of self-reported severe hypoglycaemia dur<strong>in</strong>g 9–12 months offollow-up <strong>in</strong> the UK <strong>Hypoglycaemia</strong> Group Study. Reproduced from UK <strong>Hypoglycaemia</strong> Study Group(2007), Diabetologia, with k<strong>in</strong>d permission of Spr<strong>in</strong>ger Science and Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Media

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!