13.07.2015 Views

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36 SYMPTOMS OF HYPOGLYCAEMIA• neuroglycopenic symptoms are as strongly related to actual blood glucose concentrationsas are autonomic symptoms (Cox et al., 1993a)• people with <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treated diabetes cite autonomic and neuroglycopenic symptoms withequal frequency as the primary warn<strong>in</strong>g symptoms of hypoglycaemia (Hepburn et al., 1991).Low blood glucose detection – symptom <strong>in</strong>terpretationThe correct detection of a symptom of hypoglycaemia does not always lead to correct<strong>in</strong>terpretation (Figure 2.2). After correctly detect<strong>in</strong>g relevant symptoms, people fail to detectabout 26% of episodes of low blood glucose (Gonder-Frederick et al., 1997). There areseveral factors that could break a perfect relationship between detection and recognition,and some are discussed below. However, it should be appreciated that symptom detection(<strong>in</strong>ternal cues) is not mandatory for the detection of low blood glucose. Self-test<strong>in</strong>g of bloodglucose or the <strong>in</strong>formation of family members (external cues) can lead to the successfulrecognition of hypoglycaemia without the patient hav<strong>in</strong>g detected the episode by symptomaticperception (see Box 2.1).Correct knowledge about symptoms of hypoglycaemia is necessary for the detection oflow blood glucose. The lack of such knowledge among elderly people with diabetes <strong>in</strong>particular gives cause for concern (Mutch and D<strong>in</strong>gwall-Fordyce, 1985). Of 161 diabeticpeople between ages 60 and 87, all of whom were <strong>in</strong>ject<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> or tak<strong>in</strong>g a sulphonylurea,only 22% had ever been told the symptoms of hypoglycaemia and 9% knew no symptomsat all! The percentages of the <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treated diabetic patients who knew that the follow<strong>in</strong>gsymptoms were associated with hypoglycaemia were as follows:• sweat<strong>in</strong>g (82%);• palpitations (62%);• confusion (53%);• hunger (51%);• <strong>in</strong>ability to concentrate (50%);• speech problems (41%);• sleep<strong>in</strong>ess (33%).Box 2.1Identification of hypoglycaemia• Internal cues – autonomic, neuroglycopenic and non-specific symptoms• External cues – relationship of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>jection to meals, exercise and experienceof self-management• Blood glucose monitor<strong>in</strong>g• Information from observers (e.g. relatives, friends, colleagues)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!