13.07.2015 Views

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CEREBRAL ADAPTATION 179hypoglycaemia. It is becom<strong>in</strong>g evident that changes <strong>in</strong> symptomatic responses and corticalfunction <strong>in</strong> hypoglycaemia are driven by complex mechanisms associated with, but notexclusively controlled directly by, the changes <strong>in</strong> the glucose metabolic rate of neurones.Some cognitive functions are better preserved than others dur<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycaemia <strong>in</strong> subjectswho have previous experience of hypoglycaemia than <strong>in</strong> hypoglycaemia-naive subjects whohave normal counterregulation (Fanelli et al., 1993; Boyle et al., 1995). This does not entirelyfit the cl<strong>in</strong>ical picture of patients becom<strong>in</strong>g significantly confused dur<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycaemiawhile rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g asymptomatic.One measure of cognitive function, the choice reaction time, does not appear to adapt, andwhen hypoglycaemia is <strong>in</strong>duced slowly, it deteriorates at similar levels of blood glucose <strong>in</strong>most subjects, irrespective of their previous glycaemic experience and their state of hypoglycaemiaawareness (Maran et al., 1995). Other measures of cognitive function also deteriorateat similar levels of blood glucose <strong>in</strong> diabetic subjects who have had very disparate experiencesof preced<strong>in</strong>g glycaemia (Widom and Simonson, 1990; Amiel et al., 1991; Hvidberget al., 1996). The ability of the bra<strong>in</strong> to adapt its metabolic and functional capacity accord<strong>in</strong>gto previous glycaemic experience varies across different regions of the bra<strong>in</strong>. Regions of thebra<strong>in</strong> that detect hypoglycaemia, and some parts of the cerebral cortex, may be able to adaptmore effectively to antecedent hypoglycaemia than other areas, to susta<strong>in</strong> glucose metabolismdur<strong>in</strong>g subsequent exposure. As blood glucose falls this would effectively destroy the normalprotective hierarchy of corrective and symptomatic responses that precede cognitive impairment,replac<strong>in</strong>g it with the dangerous situation whereby cognitive impairment is the <strong>in</strong>itialresponse to hypoglycaemia, with autonomic responses not occurr<strong>in</strong>g until the blood glucosedecl<strong>in</strong>es to a much lower level. In this situation the patient becomes too confused and unableto recognise the warn<strong>in</strong>g symptoms and so take appropriate corrective action (Figure 8.3).Figure 8.3 The change <strong>in</strong> hierarchy of responses to hypoglycaemia (a) before and (b) after <strong>in</strong>tensified<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy <strong>in</strong> type 1 diabetes mellitus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!