13.07.2015 Views

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

Hypoglycaemia in Clinical Diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

184 RISKS OF STRICT GLYCAEMIC CONTROLto improve their glycaemic control, especially with modern techniques that are able to deliverimproved control without <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g hypoglycaemia risk.In practice, however, there are patients <strong>in</strong> whom attempts to achieve a near normal glycatedhaemoglob<strong>in</strong> are not appropriate (Box 8.2). Patients with advanced complications, especiallyret<strong>in</strong>opathy, have not been shown to benefit and a sudden improvement <strong>in</strong> glycaemic controlmay cause acceleration <strong>in</strong> severity of pre-proliferative or early proliferative ret<strong>in</strong>opathy(Hanssen et al., 1986). Although some authorities claim that this should not be a contra<strong>in</strong>dicationto improv<strong>in</strong>g glycaemic control (Chantelau and Kohner, 1997), as yet there is no realevidence for benefit <strong>in</strong> advanced cases and the ret<strong>in</strong>opathy should be treated appropriatelybefore glycaemic control is <strong>in</strong>tensified. Similarly, <strong>in</strong> patients with established renal impairmentand severe macrovascular disease, attempts to treat elevated blood pressure and plasmalipids and to encourage patients to stop smok<strong>in</strong>g may be more beneficial than target<strong>in</strong>gglycaemic control alone. As <strong>in</strong>tensive <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> therapy is aimed at achiev<strong>in</strong>g benefit over aperiod of five to ten years or more, patients with a reduced life expectancy should not beexposed to the risks and rigours associated with this treatment regimen. This applies also toelderly patients, who may be frail and physically <strong>in</strong>active.Very young patients may not be good candidates for very strict glycaemic control. Poorcontrol should not be encouraged <strong>in</strong> children, as growth may be jeopardised, and there issome evidence that pre-pubertal glycaemic control may <strong>in</strong>fluence the later risk of complications(Donaghue et al., 1997; Holl et al., 1998). However, very small children, who arevery <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-sensitive, may be at risk of <strong>in</strong>tellectual damage if exposed to recurrent severehypoglycaemia (see Chapters 9 and 13).Box 8.2Application of strict glycaemic control <strong>in</strong> type 1 diabetesCaution required:• Long duration of <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-treated diabetes (counterregulatory deficiences).• Previous history of severe hypoglycaemia.• Established impaired awareness of hypoglycaemia.• History of epilepsy.• Patient unwill<strong>in</strong>g to do home blood glucose monitor<strong>in</strong>g.Contra<strong>in</strong>dicated:• Extremes of age.• Ischaemic heart disease.• Unstable diabetic ret<strong>in</strong>opathy (can be <strong>in</strong>stituted after treatment).• Advanced diabetic complications.• Limited life expectancy (e.g. serious coexist<strong>in</strong>g disease).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!