and Master Programmes in German Higher Education Institutions

More documents

Recommendations

Info

12 Appendix12.1 GlossaryBBMBFDAADFHHSKKMKMSBScience CouncilWRBachelor programme or degreeBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstFachhochschulenHRK HochschulkompassKultusministerkonferenzMaster programme or degreeStatistisches BundesamtWissenschaftsratWissenschaftsrat83
Page 1:
SURVEYThe Introduction of Bachelor-
Page 4 and 5:
4.3 Programme development: strategi
Page 8 and 9:
The major research instrument used
Page 10 and 11:
1.2 OutlineThe second chapter of th
Page 12 and 13:
quiring that new B/M be submitted f
Page 14 and 15:
• Bachelor programmes should conc
Page 16 and 17:
constitutes a step back compared to
Page 19 and 20:
3 Major facts concerning the introd
Page 21 and 22:
Table 4: Titles of Master degrees,
Page 23 and 24:
ever, 8% of the programmes 17 inclu
Page 25 and 26:
Other 11 4 0Note: Classification fo
Page 27 and 28:
4 The implementation processThis se
Page 29 and 30:
the process of introducing Bachelor
Page 31 and 32: Note: Not all respondents answered
Page 33 and 34: Finally, our survey asked responden
Page 35 and 36: (or 50%) in the TU sector. Some res
Page 37 and 38: 4.3.5 New forms of deliveryOur surv
Page 39 and 40: According to our survey, universiti
Page 41 and 42: 4.3.8 Credit point systemsOur surve
Page 43 and 44: Table 30: B/M that received officia
Page 45 and 46: Table 33: Practical vs. theoretical
Page 47 and 48: 5 Expected effectsThis section repo
Page 49 and 50: 6 Co-ordination of demand and suppl
Page 51 and 52: Ernesto Estrada Araque 51que el pen
Page 53: 7.4 Co-operation with industry 64In
Page 56 and 57: clearly defined, three mentioned th
Page 59 and 60: 9 Major results and discussion9.1 Q
Page 61 and 62: press their intention to introduce
Page 63 and 64: papers by umbrella organisations. A
Page 65 and 66: council (2001) indirectly favours d
Page 67 and 68: Aim (“Ausrichtung”) of Bachelor
Page 69 and 70: Institutions are polarised with reg
Page 71: In the discussion about the B/M str
Page 74 and 75: (and consequent changes in the high
Page 76 and 77: when the institutions had to make t
Page 79 and 80: 11 ReferencesAkkreditierungsrat (20
Page 81: Wissenschaftsrat (2000): Empfehlung
Page 85 and 86: A. Hochschulpolitische Weichenstell
Page 87 and 88: 7. Strebt die Hochschulleitung eine
Page 89 and 90: 11. Wie denkt die Hochschulleitung
Page 91 and 92: 14. Welche Hoffnungen verbindet die
Page 93 and 94: 16a. Weichen diese Zielgruppen von
Page 95 and 96: 20. Ist für Master-Studiengänge e
Page 97 and 98: C. Fakten zur Einführung von B/M-S
Page 99 and 100: 31. Ist das Vordiplom/die Zwischenp
Page 101 and 102: 35. Sind B/M an Ihrer Hochschule vo
Page 103 and 104: 38. Gibt es an Ihrer Hochschule B/M
Page 105 and 106: 13 Respondents by sectorF=Fachhochs
Page 107 and 108: Akademie der Bildenden Künste in N
Page 109: Theologische Fakultät Fulda U 117T
show all

and Master Programmes in German Higher Education Institutions

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?