PP654 UniSa Freney - Final Report Feb 2010.pdf - Office for ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

At the conclusion of the assessment process, a summary of results is displayed intabular and graphical format (Data & Graphs Section). This clearly displays the gradedistribution for the class helping the academic reflect on the students’ performance.Finally, the completed feedback forms are published and distributed via email to thestudents and copied to the academic (Publish Section). Marks and grades are alsoautomatically tallied in a table, which calculates an overall mark and grade based onthe results for individual assessment tasks (Mark Book Section).Computer Aided Feedback & Assessment System (CAFAS) 16
An important feature in the assessment stage is the ability to generate a list offormative feedback comments, which can be quickly inserted into the Comment Boxesof the feedback forms (refer to Appendix E for an illustration and explanation of thisprocess). This enables the assessor to draft detailed feedback, including hyperlinks towebsites for further information, which can be quickly inserted onto students’ feedbackforms whenever it is applicable. Once the feedback comment has been inserted ontothe feedback form it can be edited further to contextualise the comment according tothe particulars of the student’s assignment.Computer Aided Feedback & Assessment System (CAFAS) 17
Page 1 and 2: Report - 2010COMPUTER AIDED FEEDBAC
Page 4 and 5: 1.0 Executive SummaryThe primary ob
Page 6 and 7: 2.0 OutcomesAs stated in the origin
Page 9 and 10: more understandable to the user. Cu
Page 12 and 13: later (in conjunction with formativ
Page 14 and 15: Generic descriptors of the institut
Page 18 and 19: Thus there is the potential to buil
Page 20 and 21: institution.Product Collate researc
Page 22 and 23: A presentation at the ALTC Assessme
Page 24 and 25: These adjustments to the approach e
Page 27 and 28: Overall there were eight different
Page 29 and 30: CAFAS 7 . The students appreciated
Page 31 and 32: difficulties described previously,
Page 33 and 34: ALTC funded project), demonstrated
Page 35 and 36: grades based on their professional
Page 37 and 38: Quantification of the Programming T
Page 39 and 40: to the academic when designing a fe
Page 41 and 42: The staged trials of the system wer
Page 43 and 44: Colleagues from the Queensland Univ
Page 45 and 46: within the timeframe and the availa
Page 47 and 48: Assessment, University of South Aus
Page 49 and 50: 3. Installation of SoftwareWith ref
Page 51 and 52: If you have any comments or suggest
Page 53 and 54: e.g. Literature Review - Assignment
Page 55 and 56: to students to inform them of their
Page 57 and 58: Computer Aided Feedback & Assessmen
Page 59 and 60: Appendix D - Staff Questionnaire Re
Page 65 and 66: Appendix E - Comments Database Scre
Page 67 and 68:
Appendix G - System SpecificationsC
Page 69 and 70:
Specifications - Slider & RubricImp
Page 71 and 72:
possibility of including hyperlinks
Page 73 and 74:
Grade and Mark for Assignment 1Grad
Page 75:
Fig 4Building on the previous asses
show all

PP654 UniSa Freney - Final Report Feb 2010.pdf - Office for ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?