13.07.2015 Views

PP654 UniSa Freney - Final Report Feb 2010.pdf - Office for ...

PP654 UniSa Freney - Final Report Feb 2010.pdf - Office for ...

PP654 UniSa Freney - Final Report Feb 2010.pdf - Office for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessment SchemeThese specifications have been developed with a fairly simple, typical assessment scheme inmind – refer Figs 1 and 2 below. One tutor is responsible <strong>for</strong> marking a defined set ofstudents’ assignments. The dotted line in Fig 2 indicates “blind marking” used <strong>for</strong> moderationpurposes.Fig 1 Fig 2In Fig 3 a more complicated system is depicted. Arguably it would result in a more consistentand “fair” outcome. Tutor 1 assesses Assessment Criteria 1 and Tutor 2 (red) assessesAssessment Criteria 2 (red).Fig 3In Fig 4 both Tutors mark all assessment criteria and the marks are averaged. Commentscould be identified to show which tutor said what. This is similar to a judging panel commonin the Olympic Games.Computer Aided Feedback & Assessment System (CAFAS) 74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!