13.07.2015 Views

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SSEM/20<strong>11</strong>/4730 June 20<strong>11</strong>the time of the visit may be important. Furthermore, in August 2009, the Evolution 2 detectionsystem was replaced with the Synergy system with its better capability <strong>for</strong> detecting itemscontaining either pure beta emitters or mainly alpha emitters by their low energy gammaemission.Table 2.3. Beach find rates 2006-<strong>2010</strong> (particles <strong>and</strong> stones)MonitoringFind rate (finds per hectare)area 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10St Bees – 0.214 0.077 0.059Braystones 0.334 0.158 0.<strong>11</strong>5 1.043<strong>Sellafield</strong> 1.671 4.003 1.747 2.181Seascale – 0.209 0.188 0.176Drigg – 0.254 0.051 0.000All 0.835 1.725 0.692 0.6812.3.3 Find sizesItems recovered from the beach range in size, from tens of microns to large stones. Prior tothe 2008/9 programme, any finds recovered from the beaches surrounding <strong>Sellafield</strong> weredescribed as either stones, particles or pebbles (i.e. rounded stones). Deciding whether afind was a pebble or a stone was open to interpretation so from the 2008/9 monitoringprogramme the pebble classification was removed. At the same time, the st<strong>and</strong>ard sedimentclassification system was applied to the beach finds; anything less than 2 mm in diameter(upper limit <strong>for</strong> s<strong>and</strong> grains) was classed as a particle <strong>and</strong> anything larger than or equal to 2mm as a stone. This classification allows a foundation on which to judge the potential <strong>for</strong> a“particle” to be ingested, inhaled or adhere to the skin. However, this is based on a visualassessment following coarse separation <strong>and</strong> there will always be some ambiguity <strong>for</strong> findsaround 2 mm in size unless they are sent <strong>for</strong> detailed analysis.Contaminated stones have mainly been found within a few hundred metres north of the<strong>Sellafield</strong> pipeline. The furthest a stone has been recovered from the pipeline isapproximately 2.5 km at the northern end of <strong>Sellafield</strong> beach. Two stones have been foundon Seascale beach, the furthest south being approximately 2.5 km south of the pipeline.Table 2.4. Numbers of Particles <strong>and</strong> Stones recovered 2006-<strong>2010</strong>MonitoringareaNumber of finds2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10Particles Stones Particles Stones Particles Stones Particles StonesSt Bees – – 6 0 3 0 4 0Braystones 3 0 2 0 4 0 68 0<strong>Sellafield</strong> 4 5 129 204 79 141 102 50Seascale – – 7 0 10 3 17 0Drigg – – 5 0 2 0 0 0Allonby – – – – 1 0 – –Workington – – – – 1 0 – –All 7 5 149 204 100 144 191 50© Nuclear Decommissioning Authority 20<strong>11</strong>. <strong>11</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!