13.07.2015 Views

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

Annual Report for 2010/11 and Forward Programme - Sellafield Ltd

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SSEM/20<strong>11</strong>/4730 June 20<strong>11</strong>Table 3.10. Beta-rich Caesium Isotope Decay Factors.Time After Reprocessing(years)Percentage Activity Remaining137 Cs134 Cs137 Cs / 134 Cs Ratio0 100 100 <strong>11</strong> 97.72 71.46 1.372 95.49 36.50 2.623 93.32 13.32 7.014 91.19 3.47 26.255 89.<strong>11</strong> 0.65 137.6310 79.41 0.02 3530.3815 70.76 1.46E-04 4.86E+0520 63.05 1.76E-07 3.59E+0825 56.19 3.95E-<strong>11</strong> 1.42E+1230 50.07 1.66E-15 3.02E+16Table 3.<strong>11</strong> gives an estimated age range <strong>for</strong> beta-rich finds based on Magnox reference fueltype.Table 3.<strong>11</strong>. Beta-rich Find Estimates.137 CsActivity (Bq)Corresponding 134 CsActivity (Bq) 1Estimated Age(years)137 Cs Mean 1.20E+04 2.24E+01 Greater than 15.7137 Cs Maximum 2.92E+05 1.06E+02 Greater than 20.9137 Cs Minimum 4.75E+02 3.71E+01 Greater than 3.7 21. The age estimates are greater than the calculated value as all the 134 Cs values are at the analysis limitof detection.2. This was an excess beta-rich find with a low 137 Cs activity, which resulted in the low age estimate.A similar assessment to the alpha-rich correlation with particle volume was undertaken <strong>for</strong>beta-rich particles. In this case the 137 Cs activity was found to be more strongly correlated toparticle surface area than to particle volume. As the difference between the surface area <strong>and</strong>volume correlation was small, the assessment was extended beyond the use of all availabledata to finds with a volume greater than 1 mm 3 <strong>and</strong> finds with a volume less than 1 mm 3 . Thecorrelation R values <strong>for</strong> all three assessments were consistently higher <strong>for</strong> surface areacompared to volume by a small amount <strong>for</strong> each of these groups (i.e. R SA /R V = 0.55/0.54,0.59/0.50 <strong>and</strong> 0.80/0.76 respectively). The reasons <strong>for</strong> the small difference can be postulatedas being due to finds created in layers or the activity absorbed towards the centre of theparticle in very porous materials. A further limitation of the analysis was that it was based ondata from only 20 finds due to the difficulty in estimating particle dimension <strong>for</strong> smallparticles. This analysis will be updated when the tranche 3 analysis data becomes available. In a similar way to the alpha-rich finds an obvious starting point <strong>for</strong> a beta-rich finddistribution assessment is to look at simple histogram plots of log trans<strong>for</strong>med 137 Cs activitydata. In this case there are significant numbers of both stone <strong>and</strong> particle beta-rich finds so© Nuclear Decommissioning Authority 20<strong>11</strong>. 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!