13.07.2015 Views

Boulder Valley School District Educational Facilities Master Plan

Boulder Valley School District Educational Facilities Master Plan

Boulder Valley School District Educational Facilities Master Plan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<strong>Boulder</strong> <strong>Valley</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>District</strong><strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>The findings and recommendations contained in this chapter are based on the data contained inthe previous chapters and will be divided into the following two sections:• The <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong> recommendations for school facilityimprovements, additions, and new construction.o This section will include recommendations for providing adequate instructionalfacilities over the next six year period which are planned to provide facilities thatsupport the instructional programs of the <strong>District</strong>.• Additional recommendations which will be specific to the technology portion of theserecommendations.o These recommendations will include WAN, LANs, VoIP, and video distribution.BACKGROUNDA variety of options were examined based on meeting the stated Guiding Principles asestablished by the CIPC as well as the findings that were generated by the pubiccharrettes, online surveys, and input from school faculty and staff. This activitygenerated a list of grouped corrective actions arranged as priorities, within each of theassessment categories; that is FCA, PCA, MUOF, and IT. The committee memberswere then asked to take a survey that identified the most important of these prioritiescorrective groups within each of the four assessment categories. The results of thissurvey were then reviewed by <strong>District</strong> staff and MGT and adjusted to reflect actualbudget requirements and anomalies that could be present in such a ranking exercise.These adjustments were reviewed and accepted by the committee. The results of thissurvey created the calculations for producing a weighted prioritization model for eachcategory. These calculations were further refined at subsequent meetings, and a finalmodel for developing categorical prioritization was established.Capital Improvement <strong>Plan</strong>ning Committee May 2006 Page 105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!