Source Zone Delineation Demonstration Report - Triad Resource ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

U12-PV3<strong>Source</strong> Area #9TCE Concentration (ppmv1.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10.0VP3 i=21, j=36, k=3-6400 mg/kg TCEin 5 x 5 x 10 ft zone locatedat i = 25; j = 21; k = 8-9; no diffusion0 24 48 72 96 120 144Time (hrs)
U12-PV3<strong>Source</strong> Area #1012.011.5VP3 i=21, j=36, k=3-6TCE Concentration (ppm11.010.510.09.59.08.58.014.5EVS average soil concentration; no diffusion0 24 48 72 96 120Time (hrs)VP3 i=21, j=36, k=3-6TCE Concentration (ppm14.013.513.012.5EVS maximum soil concentration; no diffusion12.00 24 48 72 96 120Time (hrs)
Page 1 and 2:
FinalSource Zone Delineation Demons
Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis report docume
Page 5:
The SVE demonstration conducted in
Page 8 and 9:
TABLE OF CONTENTSEXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Page 10 and 11:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure ES-1 Iso-Conc
Page 12 and 13:
Figure 5-38 Horizontal slices at fi
Page 14 and 15:
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONSA
Page 16 and 17:
Hill Air Force BaseUtahRIVERDALEWeb
Page 18 and 19:
Co-Team LeaderCo-Team LeaderURS Pro
Page 20 and 21:
1.4 Report OrganizationThe remainin
Page 22 and 23:
Davis-Weber CanalDetail AreaHillAir
Page 24 and 25:
ANorthSouthU5-18864,580CROSS SECTIO
Page 26 and 27:
Approx. LocationOf BarrelsInitial S
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 3-2. Wireline locking and re
Page 30 and 31:
3.3 DSITMS Soil AnalyticsDirect sam
Page 32 and 33:
4.0 SOIL VAPOR EXTRACTION DEMONSTRA
Page 34 and 35:
The equilibrium four-phase distribu
Page 36 and 37:
3520 ft. from well, 3.5 cfmTCE in E
Page 38 and 39:
The SVE system included piping from
Page 40 and 41:
SVE Process System and On-Site DSIT
Page 42 and 43:
Table 4-3. Summary of OU 12 SVE Ste
Page 44 and 45:
3,000U12-VP1 Calibration Curve2,500
Page 46 and 47:
5.0 RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLING AND SV
Page 48 and 49:
0U12-1802100U12-1803100U12-18051020
Page 50 and 51:
0102030405060700U12-1804U12-1807102
Page 52 and 53:
Figure 5-4. Soil samples collected
Page 54 and 55:
298400298360Northing (ft)2983202982
Page 56 and 57:
298400298360Northing (ft)2983202982
Page 58 and 59:
The final TCE soil contamination mo
Page 60 and 61:
298400298360Northing (ft)2983202982
Page 62 and 63:
Figure 5-12. Isometric view, lookin
Page 64 and 65:
An isometric view of the upscaled a
Page 66 and 67:
March 2003 5-21 OU 12 Demonstration
Page 68 and 69:
4620WE460045804560454045204500Verti
Page 70 and 71:
4620WE460045804560Elevation (ft)454
Page 72 and 73:
Volumetric calculations yield an es
Page 74 and 75:
The position of the water table in
Page 76 and 77:
5.2 OU 12 SVE EvaluationThe OU 12 S
Page 78 and 79:
Vapor Probe #1Vapor Probe #2Vapor P
Page 80 and 81:
Thus, the in situ air permeability
Page 82 and 83:
0.0000-0.0010U12-VP1 ResponsePressu
Page 84 and 85:
0.000020.00000U12-VP1 ResponsePress
Page 86 and 87:
Table 5-5. Estimated In Situ Air Pe
Page 88 and 89:
10.0U12-VP1 Pneumatic Response8.0Ai
Page 90 and 91:
1,400841,20072TCE Concentration (pp
Page 92 and 93:
800.98700.84TCE Concentration (ppmv
Page 94 and 95:
200.018180.016TCE Concentration (pp
Page 96 and 97:
1400.491200.42TCE Concentration (pp
Page 98 and 99:
4600OU12-VP1OU12-VP2 OU12-VP3 OU12-
Page 100 and 101:
the screened interval in U12-VP1 an
Page 102 and 103:
permeability layer. Final adjustmen
Page 104 and 105:
Table 5-7. Comparison of Measured a
Page 106 and 107:
Table 5-8. continuedFile Name Extra
Page 108 and 109:
U12-1802U12-VP3U12-1812U12-1803U12-
Page 110 and 111:
U12-1802U12-VP3U12-1812U12-1803U12-
Page 112 and 113:
U12-1802U12-VP3U12-1812U12-1803U12-
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 5-42 shows a comparison betw
Page 116 and 117:
U12-VP1 50 mg/kg source 10 ft thick
Page 118 and 119:
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 455 10 15 20
Page 120 and 121:
25 - 30 feet bgs30 - 35 feet bgs35
Page 122 and 123:
U12-VP1 200 mg/kg source 10 ft thic
Page 124 and 125:
A comparison between the predicted
Page 126 and 127:
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 455 10 15 20
Page 128 and 129:
U12-VP1 EVS Maximum Soil Concentrat
Page 130 and 131:
9,200Predicted TCE Concentration (p
Page 132 and 133:
6.1 Conventional Sampling and Analy
Page 134 and 135:
Table 6-2. Estimated Cost for OU 12
Page 136 and 137:
6.1.2 Direct Push Technology (DPT)T
Page 138 and 139:
Table 6-4. Estimated Cost for OU 12
Page 140 and 141:
that the Wireline CPT sampler canno
Page 142 and 143:
Table 6-5. Summary of Estimated Cos
Page 144 and 145:
The Wireline CPT tool is not effect
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 7-1. Iso-concentration surfa
Page 148 and 149:
24U12-VP5 Combined Testing201612846
Page 150 and 151:
8.0 REFERENCESBear, J. 1979. Hydrau
Page 152 and 153:
TABLE A-1FIELD ANALYICAL RESULTS FO
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
APPENDIX BSimulated TCE Vapor-Phase
Page 172 and 173: TCE Concentration (ppmv2,4702,4602,
Page 174 and 175: U12-PV1Source Area #2TCE Concentrat
Page 176 and 177: U12-PV1Source Area #2250VP1 i=24, j
Page 184 and 185: TCE Concentration (ppmvTCE Concentr
Page 196 and 197: U12-PV1Source Area #9500450VP1 i=24
Page 198 and 199: TCE Concentration (ppmTCE Concentra
Page 200 and 201: 700600U12-PV1Source Area #9VP1 i=24
Page 220 and 221: U12-PV2Source Area #10250VP2 i=23,
Page 228 and 229: TCE Concentration (ppm1.00.90.80.70
Page 234 and 235: U12-PV6Source Area #101816VP6 i=33,
Page 236: TCE Concentration (ppm6050403020100
show all

Source Zone Delineation Demonstration Report - Triad Resource ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?