Management of the Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Insect ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SESSION 1Diamondback moth & other cruciferinsect pests ‐ global challengesin the 21st century
Page 1 and 2: PROCEEDINGSThe Sixth International
Page 3 and 4: PROCEEDINGSThe Sixth International
Page 5 and 6: Table of ContentsForewordixAcknowle
Page 7 and 8: Myco‐Jaal® - A novel formulation
Page 9 and 10: ForewordVegetable brassicas such as
Page 11: AcknowledgementsThe Sixth Internati
Page 16 and 17: (Gupta and Thorsteinson 1960; revie
Page 18 and 19: There was no difference in survival
Page 20 and 21: Predicting outbreaks of amigratory
Page 22 and 23: Table 1. Original (Zalucki and Furl
Page 24 and 25: EIFigure 4. Annual EI values (pink
Page 26 and 27: thanked for comments on an earlier
Page 28 and 29: were applied to control DBM in 1992
Page 30 and 31: Table 2. The insecticide rotation s
Page 32 and 33: - undertake breeding and trial acti
Page 34 and 35: Susceptibility of key pests to the
Page 36 and 37: No vector backbone present Does not
Page 38 and 39: egulatory approval and authorizatio
Page 40 and 41: 28 AVRDC - The World Vegetable Cent
Page 43 and 44: Studies on the biology andtoxicity
Page 45 and 46: 0.84, 1.40 and 1.69 mm, respectivel
Page 47 and 48: Figure 1. Biology of Crocidolomia b
Page 49 and 50: Suganyakanna S, Chandrasekaran S, R
Page 51 and 52: esistance in P. xylostella and can
Page 53 and 54: Figure 1. Mean (±SE) recovery and
Page 55 and 56: Duration of experimentDuration of e
Page 57 and 58: Prasifka JR, Schmidt NP, Kohler KA,
Page 59 and 60: MATERIALS AND METHODSDBM behaviorDB
Page 61 and 62: DBM larvae in the field by DS will
Page 63 and 64:
Monitoring ofdiamondback moth in ac
Page 65 and 66:
in each crop. Standard errors of we
Page 67 and 68:
DairyNZ Ltd, Beef & Lamb New Zealan
Page 69 and 70:
Figures 3A, B & C. Mean number of D
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 1. Pheromone trap catches (m
Page 73:
SESSION 3Insect ‐ plant interacti
Page 76 and 77:
glucosinolates and saponins were co
Page 78 and 79:
Shelton AM, Badenes-Perez FR. 2006.
Page 80 and 81:
Aphid (Lipaphis erysimi (Kltb))Aphi
Page 82 and 83:
Host plant selection byCrocidolomia
Page 84 and 85:
moths laying an egg mass on each sp
Page 86 and 87:
these studies the trap crop was pla
Page 88 and 89:
76 AVRDC - The World Vegetable Cent
Page 91 and 92:
Potential ofentomopathogenic fungia
Page 93 and 94:
Plant extractionEssential oils were
Page 95 and 96:
nortriterpene quinone methides (pri
Page 97 and 98:
Table 6. Oviposition inhibitory eff
Page 99 and 100:
Efficacy of Plutellaxylostella para
Page 101 and 102:
on Brassica plants in Europe, and t
Page 103 and 104:
past, it has been shown repeatedly
Page 105 and 106:
Naturally-occurringparasitism ofdia
Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Parasitoids of P. xylostel
Page 109 and 110:
Diversity and abundanceof diamondba
Page 111 and 112:
(Maerim 1, Hod 1 and Hod 3) where D
Page 113 and 114:
100908070RH (%)Parasitization (%) b
Page 115 and 116:
Species characterizationof microspo
Page 117 and 118:
Table 1. The SSUrRNA sequences of m
Page 119 and 120:
Based on the sampling location, Vai
Page 121 and 122:
Effects of temperature anddifferent
Page 123 and 124:
Table 2. Percentage mortality (accu
Page 125 and 126:
Furlong MJ, Asgari S. 2010. Effects
Page 127 and 128:
Table 1. Commercial brassica planti
Page 129 and 130:
aphids in a density-dependent manne
Page 131 and 132:
Table 7. Pitfall trap captures for
Page 133 and 134:
Predators per plant21.81.61.41.210.
Page 135 and 136:
Mode of action andefficacy of Bioac
Page 137 and 138:
DBM, which was 3.8 times lower than
Page 139 and 140:
Berenbaum, M.R. (1989). North Ameri
Page 141 and 142:
target organisms. The documentation
Page 143 and 144:
Bt products with well recognized br
Page 145 and 146:
the solvents hexane, ,benzene, chlo
Page 147 and 148:
Table 3. Antifeedant effect of Acor
Page 149 and 150:
Antifeedant and toxicityactivities
Page 151 and 152:
xylostella larva (after starvation
Page 153 and 154:
crude extracts of this plant showed
Page 155 and 156:
ReferencesAbdel-Razek AS, Abbas MH,
Page 158 and 159:
Location 2: HendersonThe trial at H
Page 160 and 161:
Another contributing factor to the
Page 162 and 163:
Biological control ofdiamondback mo
Page 164 and 165:
Table 3. Parasitism rate of DBM lar
Page 166 and 167:
the market survey, available biopes
Page 168 and 169:
Efficacy of Myco-Jaal ® against DB
Page 170 and 171:
esistance in field population of di
Page 172 and 173:
against 13 populations from differe
Page 174 and 175:
BolpurWest BengalF 2 0.70 (0.04) 0.
Page 176 and 177:
Toxicity and biologicaleffects of n
Page 178 and 179:
to death of larvae (Nasiruddin and
Page 180 and 181:
Table 1. Antifeedant activity of ne
Page 182 and 183:
Table 4. Effect of neem limonoids o
Page 184 and 185:
Why is a crude extract ofneem super
Page 186 and 187:
II. Field EvaluationExperimental ar
Page 188 and 189:
During the first three days of obse
Page 190 and 191:
Table 2: Different yield parameters
Page 192 and 193:
43.532.521. 51y = 2.1924e -0.0225xR
Page 194 and 195:
Field assessment ofaqueous suspensi
Page 196 and 197:
same conidial rate plus imidaclopri
Page 198 and 199:
Sarfraz, M., Keddie, A.B. and Dosda
Page 200 and 201:
Effects of sub-lethal dosesof Bacil
Page 202 and 203:
Effects of Cry toxins and Bt formul
Page 204 and 205:
good for D. semiclausum in the curr
Page 206 and 207:
Table 1. Effect of Cry 1B toxin fed
Page 208 and 209:
Table 6. Effect of Cry 1Ba2 on Diad
Page 211 and 212:
Update on DBM diamideresistance fro
Page 213 and 214:
Other influencing factorsBased on s
Page 215 and 216:
lepidopteran larvae in crucifers. T
Page 217 and 218:
insecticide have already been exten
Page 219 and 220:
Some Australianpopulations ofdiamon
Page 221 and 222:
Lockyer Valley population; four rep
Page 223 and 224:
Table 4. Slope, LC 50 (ppm) and let
Page 225 and 226:
Figure 5. Per cent mortality of P.
Page 227 and 228:
Braconidae) and Oomyzus sokolowskii
Page 229 and 230:
MATERIALS AND METHODSInsecticidesDe
Page 231 and 232:
Table 1: Susceptibility of six fiel
Page 233 and 234:
Table 5: Resistance ratios of delta
Page 235 and 236:
used to find a way to improve on sp
Page 237 and 238:
Trichoplusia ni, and Pieris brassic
Page 239 and 240:
y chemically modifying two naturall
Page 241 and 242:
Figure 1 shows the cabbage growing
Page 243 and 244:
eflected on the pesticide volume im
Page 245 and 246:
Thesis Abstracts in Entomology (197
Page 247 and 248:
spinosad and change to using indoxa
Page 249 and 250:
which provide a potentially large r
Page 251 and 252:
Table 2: Lambda-cyhalothrin (Karate
Page 253 and 254:
Crucifer vegetableinsecticide resis
Page 255 and 256:
new products. For these reasons, th
Page 257 and 258:
Table 1. LC 50 estimates for 14 DBM
Page 259 and 260:
Plutellidae) on broccoli crops. Jou
Page 261 and 262:
Usually insecticide resistance leve
Page 263 and 264:
Wu G, Jiang S, Miyata T. 2004. Effe
Page 265:
SESSION 6Overcoming barriers to dev
Page 268 and 269:
experimental cabbage field was 2781
Page 270 and 271:
Table 2. Mean numbers (±SE) of lar
Page 272 and 273:
Introduction andestablishment ofDia
Page 274 and 275:
Table 2. Area-wide releases of Diad
Page 276 and 277:
unacceptable pesticide residues, an
Page 278 and 279:
Control management ofdiamondback mo
Page 280 and 281:
followed by chlorantraniliprole, to
Page 282 and 283:
Status, damage potentialand managem
Page 284 and 285:
instars (Table 3). The major mortal
Page 286 and 287:
concerned, studies are much limited
Page 288 and 289:
Table 6. Efficacy of botanicals on
Page 290 and 291:
Poor quality seeds and inputsTimely
Page 292 and 293:
Implementation of IPM:experiences w
Page 294 and 295:
Table 2. General practices of farme
Page 296 and 297:
Lim GS. 1982. The biology and effec
Page 298 and 299:
of brassicas because it has develop
Page 300 and 301:
Ongoing research into IPM related i
Page 302 and 303:
Insects: Approximately 400 DBM pupa
Page 304 and 305:
Insecticide resistanceThe resistanc
Page 306 and 307:
Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera :
Page 308 and 309:
three days after each spray applica
Page 311 and 312:
Baseline susceptibility ofdiamondba
Page 313 and 314:
triton X-100. Six larvae were relea
Page 315 and 316:
A B C DFigure 1. Kanamycin sensitiv
Page 317 and 318:
The efficacy andsustainability of t
Page 319 and 320:
Genes for resistance to either prot
Page 321 and 322:
Most cabbage and cauliflower fields
Page 323 and 324:
Table 1. Mean percentage larval sur
Page 325 and 326:
former, sterile males are not distr
Page 327 and 328:
Holbrook, F.R., and Fujimoto, M.S.
Page 329 and 330:
ParticipantsParticipante‐mailOrga
Page 331 and 332:
Participant e‐mail Organization C
Page 333:
Miyata, T. ........................
show all

Management of the Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Insect ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?