13.07.2015 Views

SHLAA _version 6_ - 2011 Update Document - Basingstoke and ...

SHLAA _version 6_ - 2011 Update Document - Basingstoke and ...

SHLAA _version 6_ - 2011 Update Document - Basingstoke and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Category 2: Neither Accepted nor Rejected but Requires Further Information <strong>and</strong> Investigationsite refKING011address/locationL<strong>and</strong> onthe southeast side ofSwamStreetarea(ha)l<strong>and</strong>owner/agentsite details <strong>and</strong> deliverability0.35 Mark Offord The site lies to the south of Kingsclere, <strong>and</strong> the majority of the site lies adjacent to, butoutside the Settlement Policy Boundary (SPB) as defined under Policy D5 of the ALP. A smallsection of the south western part of the site falls within the SPB of the settlement. The sitecomprises an area of vacant l<strong>and</strong> to the south east of Swan Street, with pedestrian accessdirectly onto Swan Street. Vehicular access would be subject to local highways authorityapproval. A screen of young trees exists on the north western boundary of the site, whilst theeastern boundary of the site adjoins with a number of residential properties on Fielden Court.The site falls within the Kingsclere Conservation Area <strong>and</strong> therefore consideration wouldneed to be given to Policy E3 of the ALP.Category 3: Schedule of rejected sites - currently not demonstrating the ability to contribute to the creation ofsustainable communities. (New sites shown in bold)New sites, not previously considered in the <strong>SHLAA</strong>, are shown in bold. Comments reflect the existing approach <strong>and</strong>wording used for sites <strong>and</strong> settlements in Version 6 of the <strong>SHLAA</strong>. As the <strong>SHLAA</strong> states, it is for the LDF to determinewhich settlements should accommodate further growth <strong>and</strong> which sites are suitable for development, <strong>and</strong> this appendix,along with the rest of the document, will be updated in due course to take account of decisions made through the LDFrelating to site <strong>and</strong> distribution work, future reviews of Settlement Policy Boundaries <strong>and</strong> neighbourhood planning. Afootnote has been added to each of the new sites to reflect this position. This table also now includes sites previouslylisted in appendix 5 of Version 6 of the <strong>SHLAA</strong> entitled ‘Additional Sites Identified from October 2008 Draft <strong>SHLAA</strong>Consultation: Rejected Sites - Currently not Demonstrating the Ability to Contribute to the Creation of SustainableCommunities (same status as category 3 sites in appendix 4)’.17 of 36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!