13.07.2015 Views

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

397 B.R. 642 Page 11397 B.R. 642(Cite as: 397 B.R. 642)judgment on Count 1 <strong>of</strong> the Amended Complaint shouldbe granted, and that portion <strong>of</strong> the Trustee's Cross-Motionon Count 1 <strong>of</strong> the Amended Complaint should be denied.based upon the consideration *655 exchanged as set forthin the Settlement Agreement, the Transfer was not afraudulent transfer under Section 548 as a matter <strong>of</strong> law.In the Alternative, the Transfer Was Not a FraudulentTransfer Under Section548 Based Upon the Consideration Exchanged[11] In the alternative, this Court has determined that,Defendant asserts the Transfer was not a fraudulent transfer,by using the following calculations:Agreed value <strong>of</strong> marital residence: $532,000Less:Wells Fargo Mortgage balance: ($140,000)Projected real estate commission, transfer tax and closing ($ 20,960)costs if property were sold:Total $160,960Net Equity: $371,040Debtor's Net Equity transferred to Defendant: $185,520--------Defendant then asserts that she was entitled to the followingcredits against Debtor's Net Equity:Child support arrears, pursuant to pendente lite order: $ 45,532Parents loan to parties to build and maintain the marital $ 61,000residence (total $122,000) l/2 due from Debtor:Repairs and maintenance <strong>of</strong> $8,300 to house during divorce; $ 4,150one half charged to Debtor per pendente lite order):Outstanding bills for life insurance, automobile insurance, $ 1,800water and miscellaneous, which was Debtor's obligationduring the divorce, per pendente lite order but whichDebtor did not pay:Defendant's attorney's legal fee, which Debtor did not pay: $ 29,500One half <strong>of</strong> marital assets improperly taken by Debtor: $ 15,213Value <strong>of</strong> waiver <strong>of</strong> interest in Debtor's $92,000 annuity: $ 32,200Waiver <strong>of</strong> maintenance (alimony) <strong>of</strong> $1,000 per month for 48 $ 48,000months:Total value to Debtor from settlement: $237,395--------Thus, even if this Court did examine the considerationexchanged under the Settlement Agreement and theJudgment <strong>of</strong> Divorce, the Defendant argues she did notreceive a fraudulent transfer as a matter <strong>of</strong> law, and that,in fact, Debtor received more value than he relinquished.Agreed value <strong>of</strong> the Marital Residence: 532,000Less: Wells Fargo Mortgage balance $140,000Net Equity: $392,000The Debtor's interest in the Marital Residence: $196,000The Trustee asserts that the proper calculation regardingthe Transfer is as follows:Then, according to the precise terms <strong>of</strong> the SettlementAgreement, the Trustee asserts Defendant was entitled toonly the following credits:Support arrears under the pendente lite Order: $ 45,532© 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!