13.07.2015 Views

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

394 B.R. 721 Page 3394 B.R. 721, 50 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 192(Cite as: 394 B.R. 721)[13] Fraudulent Conveyances 9186k9 Most Cited Cases[13] Fraudulent Conveyances 101186k101 Most Cited CasesInsider preferences by insolvent transferor, even whenmade to satisfy valid debts, lack "good faith," for purpose<strong>of</strong> constructive fraud provision <strong>of</strong> New York fraudulenttransfer law. N.Y.McKinney's Debtor and Creditor <strong>Law</strong>§§ 272-274.[14] Bankruptcy 272451k2724 Most Cited CasesHeightened federal pleading standards do not apply toconstructive fraudulent transfer claims, which are subjectto less rigorous pleading requirements. 11 U.S.C.A. §548(a)(1)(B); Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 9(b), 28 U.S.C.A.[15] Bankruptcy 272451k2724 Most Cited CasesPlaintiff need not provide specific facts to support allegationsthat transfer is constructively fraudulent to creditors;all that is required is that plaintiff's allegations give defendantfair notice <strong>of</strong> what plaintiff's claim is and thegrounds upon which it rests. 11 U.S.C.A. § 548(a)(1)(B);Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rules 8(a), 9(b), 28 U.S.C.A.[16] Bankruptcy 216251k2162 Most Cited CasesUnder federal pleading standards, while allegations <strong>of</strong>defendant's knowledge may be made generally, conclusorystatements will not suffice; rather, complaint mustallege some specific facts which support inference <strong>of</strong>knowledge. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 9(b), 28 U.S.C.A.[17] Bankruptcy 2650(5)51k2650(5) Most Cited CasesIndirect benefits, such as synergies or increased access tocapital, that debtor receives as result <strong>of</strong> considerationpassing to third parties, particularly affiliates, may constitutefair consideration to debtor, for constructive fraudulenttransfer avoidance purposes. 11 U.S.C.A. §548(a)(1)(B).[18] Bankruptcy 270151k2701 Most Cited CasesAvoidance and recovery <strong>of</strong> property that was subject <strong>of</strong>avoided transfer are separate concepts under the BankruptcyCode. 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 544-549, 550.[19] Bankruptcy 270151k2701 Most Cited CasesIt is only to extent that transfer is actually avoided thattrustee may recover from transferees on avoided transferunder the plain terms <strong>of</strong> Code provision governing liability<strong>of</strong> initial, immediate and mediate transferees. 11U.S.C.A. § 550.[20] Statutes 188361k188 Most Cited CasesStarting point for construction <strong>of</strong> any statute is plain language<strong>of</strong> statute itself.[21] Bankruptcy 270151k2701 Most Cited Cases[21] Bankruptcy 272351k2723 Most Cited CasesWhile it was only to extent that transfers were actuallyavoided that unsecured creditors' committee could recoverfrom transferees on avoided transfers, initial transfereesthat no longer retained any interest in the transferredproperty were not "necessary parties" in cause <strong>of</strong> action torecover from immediate or mediate transferees, and unsecuredcreditors' committee could pursue avoidance claimsdirectly against immediate or mediate transferees fromwhich it was seeking to recover without having first successfullyprosecuted avoidance claim against initial transferees,and without joining initial transferees as parties tosuit; indeed, even if committee had previously avoidedtransfers in cause <strong>of</strong> action against initial transferees, itwould still have to avoid transfers as against immediate ormediate transferees as prerequisite to recovering therefrom,unless issue or claim preclusion principles applied.11 U.S.C.A. § 550.[22] Bankruptcy 2159.151k2159.1 Most Cited CasesCourts apply three-part test to determine whether joinder<strong>of</strong> party is required, under which they inquire (1) whetherabsent party is "necessary" party; (2) whether joinder <strong>of</strong>absent party is feasible; and, if joinder is not feasible, (3)whether court, in equity and good conscience, shoulddismiss lawsuit because nonparty is "indispensable."Fed.Rules Bankr.Proc.Rule 7019, 11 U.S.C.A.; Fed.RulesCiv.Proc.Rule 19, 28 U.S.C.A.[23] Bankruptcy 2159.151k2159.1 Most Cited CasesEffect that decision may have on absent third party is not© 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!