13.07.2015 Views

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

780 N.Y.S.2d 409 Page 19 A.D.3d 553, 780 N.Y.S.2d 409, 2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 05710(Cite as: 9 A.D.3d 553, 780 N.Y.S.2d 409)Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for DANIELS,JEFFREYDate/Time <strong>of</strong> Request:Wednesday, October 21, 2009 18:28 EasternClient Identifier:NALDatabase:NY-CSCitation Text: 780 N.Y.S.2d 409Lines: 170Documents: 1Images: 0The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with ThomsonReuters, West and their affiliates.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department,New York.In the Matter <strong>of</strong> MEGA PERSONAL LINES, INC.,et al., Appellants,v.Dianne HALTON, Individually and as Executor <strong>of</strong>the Estate <strong>of</strong> Robert L. Halton,Deceased, et al., Respondents.July 1, 2004.Background: Transferee brought action seeking determinationthat funds it received from judgmentdebtor were not subject to restraint by judgmentcreditors. The Supreme Court, Saratoga County,Nolan Jr., J., entered summary judgment in favor <strong>of</strong>judgment creditors, and transferee appealed.Holding: The Supreme Court, Appellate Division,Rose, J., held that fact issues remained as to whethermajority shareholder <strong>of</strong> judgment debtor had controllinginterest in transferee.Reversed.West Headnotes[1] Judgment 183228k183 Most Cited CasesTrial court did not abuse its discretion in entertainingsecond summary judgment motion, where secondmotion was made after completion <strong>of</strong> discovery andturned upon issue not previously decided.[2] Fraudulent Conveyances 8186k8 Most Cited CasesIn order to establish fraudulent transfer by defendantin action for money damages, plaintiffs must provethat transferor was defendant in action for moneydamages at time <strong>of</strong> transfer, that transferor has notsatisfied resulting judgment, and transfer was madewithout fair consideration. McKinney's Debtor andCreditor <strong>Law</strong> § 273-a.[3] Fraudulent Conveyances 66186k66 Most Cited Cases[3] Fraudulent Conveyances 155186k155 Most Cited CasesGood faith <strong>of</strong> both transferor and transferee is indispensablecomponent <strong>of</strong> fair consideration in determiningwhether transfer during pendency <strong>of</strong> actionfor money damages is fraudulent conveyance.McKinney's Debtor and Creditor <strong>Law</strong> §§ 272, 273-a.[4] Corporations 548(9)101k548(9) Most Cited CasesAlthough transfer <strong>of</strong> corporate assets to insider establisheslack <strong>of</strong> good faith as matter <strong>of</strong> law, transfer <strong>of</strong>assets must be either directly to insider or to entitycontrolled by insider. McKinney's Debtor and Creditor<strong>Law</strong> § 272.[5] Judgment 181(31)228k181(31) Most Cited CasesGenuine issue <strong>of</strong> material fact as to whether majorityshareholder <strong>of</strong> judgment debtor had controlling interestin transferee corporation precluded summary© 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!