FRAUDULENT CONVEYANCES Nassau Academy of Law CLE Live ...

443 F.3d 180 Page 12443 F.3d 180(Cite as: 443 F.3d 180)Grace v. Rosenstock, No. cv-85-2039 (E.D.N.Y.Aug. 14, 1986) (order granting plaintiffs' motion forclass certification).Grace IIGrace v. Rosenstock, No. 85-cv-2039 (E.D.N.Y. Jan.19, 1989) (order of discontinuance entered for GraceI ).Grace IIIGrace v. Rosenstock, No. cv-85-2354 (E.D.N.Y.Mar. 29, 1993) (order holding that Grace I was discontinuedin error and reopening the case).Grace IVGrace v. Rosenstock, No. 85-cv-2039 (E.D.N.Y.June 8, 1993) (default judgments entered againstBriggs and BAC; neither corporation was representedby counsel).Grace VGrace v. Rosenstock, 169 F.R.D. 473, 480-86(E.D.N.Y.1996) (order denying plaintiffs permissionto add new defendants and assert new claims).Grace IXGrace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40 (2d Cir.2000)(opinion affirming Grace V and Grace VIII ).Grace XGrace v. Bank Leumi Trust Co. (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30,2004), 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5294 (fraudulent conveyanceaction transferred from the Southern Districtto the Eastern District of New York).*195 Grace XIGrace v. Rosenstock, No. 85-cv-2039 (E.D.N.Y. Oct.4, 2004) (order vacating the default judgment againstnon-party movants).Grace XII and Grace XIIIGrace v. Bank Leumi, No. 04-cv-0708 (E.D.N.Y.Oct. 6, 2004); Grace v. Schwartz, No. 04-cv-1622(E.D.N.Y. Oct. 14, 2004) (orders dismissing the twofraudulent conveyance actions brought by plaintiffsagainst non-party movants).443 F.3d 180END OF DOCUMENTGrace VIGrace v. Rosenstock, No. 85-cv-2039 (E.D.N.Y.Nov. 7, 1996) (order affirming Grace V in its entiretyand denying plaintiffs leave to take an interlocutoryappeal).Grace VIIGrace v. Rosenstock, No. 85-cv-2039 (E.D.N.Y.Aug. 15, 1997) (judgment entered against Rosenstockand Briggs).Grace VIIIGrace v. Rosenstock, 23 F.Supp.2d 326 (E.D.N.Y.Oct.29, 1998) (order dismissing the claims againstGenser in their entirety).© 2009 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.