13.07.2015 Views

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

December 2005, Supplement, Volume 14, Number 4 837. Physically impaired prosthesis placement skills8. Unsatisfactory existing s<strong>of</strong>t tissue retention caseB. Therapeutic goals1. Restored facial form2. Protect exposed mucous membranes3. Restored esthetics4. Improved patient self-esteem5. Improved patient confidence in retention <strong>of</strong> prosthesis6. Improved quality <strong>of</strong> life7. Improved compromised surgical resultC. Risk factors affecting quality <strong>of</strong> treatment (severity factors that increase risk and the potential forknown complications)1. Size and location <strong>of</strong> the defect2. Possible surgical tissue contours3. Possible radiation sequela4. Psychosocial factors5. Patient’s age6. Patient’s expectations and motivation7. Patient’s compliance8. Tissue reaction to penetrating materials9. S<strong>of</strong>t-tissue depth and movement at penetration side10. Bone availability, quality, and depth at receptor sites11. Previous radiation therapy and bone residual vascularity12. Superstructure design and ease <strong>of</strong> maintenance13. Dexterity, visual acuity, and motor skills in placement <strong>of</strong> prosthesis14. S<strong>of</strong>t-tissue reaction at penetration site over timeD. Standards <strong>of</strong> care1. Review medical history (includes radiation ports, type, amount, etc.)2. Surgical removal <strong>of</strong> impending tissue remnants3. Appropriate consultation and referrals for alternative treatment modalities4. Prosthesis compatibility with existing tissues5. Accurate impression, superstructure design with correct prosthesis construction, retention modalities,and coloration6. Post-treatment maintenance <strong>of</strong> prosthesis7. Education <strong>of</strong> patient8. Knowledge <strong>of</strong> osseointegration theory, principles, and techniques9. Referral <strong>of</strong> adjunctive care as indicated (HBO)E. Specialty performance assessment1. Favorable outcomesa. Improved psychosocial attitude, self-esteem, and confidenceb. Improved facial symmetryc. Improved estheticsd. Improved organ function (i.e., airflow, directional hearing, etc.)e. Protection <strong>of</strong> exposed mucous membranes2. Known risk and complicationsa. Unrealistic patient expectationsb. Loss <strong>of</strong> prosthesis usec. Change in color and appearance <strong>of</strong> prosthesisd. Loss <strong>of</strong> prosthesis marginal integrity with usee. Tissue irritation at implant penetration sitef. Tissue changes requiring modification or refabrication <strong>of</strong> prosthesisg. Loss <strong>of</strong> mechanical retention2010 CDEL Re-recognition <strong>of</strong> the Specialty Report 123 <strong>of</strong> 279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!