13.07.2015 Views

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

30 Clmsjfication <strong>of</strong>Com&e Edentulirm a iMcGa? et a1Figure 1. Radiograph with residual bonc height <strong>of</strong> 2 1 mmor greater measured at the least vertical height <strong>of</strong> themandible (Type I).procedures would be most appropriate for a patientwith a specific diagnosis.With the premise that complete edentulism hasdiffering degrees <strong>of</strong> severity, the committee sought toidentify and group the most significant diagnosticcriteria. The following criteria should help in applyingthe guidelines in a consistent manner.A Systematic Review <strong>of</strong> DiagnosticCriteria for the Edentulous PatientThe diagnostic criteria are organized by their objectivenature and not in their rank <strong>of</strong> significance.Because <strong>of</strong> variations in adaptive responses, certaincriteria are more significant than others5 However,objective criteria will allow for the most accurateapplication <strong>of</strong> the classification system and nieasurement<strong>of</strong> its efficacy. Objectivity also will providereliable outcome data and mechanisms for review bythird-party payers and peer-review panels. The diagnosticcriteria used in the classification system arelisted in the worksheet (Table 1).Figure 3. Radiograph with residual bone height <strong>of</strong> 11 to15 mm mcasured at the least vertical height <strong>of</strong> themandible (Type HI).Bone Height: Mandible onlyThe identification and measurement <strong>of</strong> residualbone height is the most easily quantified objectivecriterion for the mandibular edentulous ridge.6-g Inaddition, it represents a measurement <strong>of</strong> the chronicdebilitation associated with complete edcntulism inthe mandible. Despite the lack <strong>of</strong> a known etiology, ithas been establishcd that the loss <strong>of</strong> denturesupportingstructures does occur.6.8 Atwood‘s descriptionin 1971 <strong>of</strong> alveolar bone loss is still applicabletoday: “Chronic progressive, irreversible and disablingprocess probably <strong>of</strong> multifactoral origin. At thepresent time, the importance <strong>of</strong> various c<strong>of</strong>actors isunknown.” The continued decrease in bone volumeaffects: 1) denture-bearing area; 2) tissues remainingfor reconstruction; 3) facial muscle support/attachment;4) total facial heightg; and 5) ridge morphol-ogy.The results <strong>of</strong> a radiographic survey <strong>of</strong> residualbone height measurement are affected by the variationin the radiographic techniques and magnification<strong>of</strong> panoramic machines <strong>of</strong> different manufacturers.To minimize variability in radiographictechniques, the measurement should be made on theradiograph at that portion <strong>of</strong> the mandible <strong>of</strong> the leastFigure 2. Radiograph with residual bone height <strong>of</strong> 16 to20 mm measured at the least vertical height <strong>of</strong> themandible (Type n).Figure 4. Radiograph with residual bone height <strong>of</strong> 10 mmor less measured at the least vertical height <strong>of</strong> the mandible(Type IV).2010 CDEL Re-recognition <strong>of</strong> the Specialty Report 149 <strong>of</strong> 279

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!