PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

More documents

Recommendations

Info

94 Parameters of Care Tupac et alPosnick WR: Prosthetic management of palatopharyngeal incompetency for the pediatric patient. ASDC J Dent Child 1976;43:46-48Speech Aid, PediatricAram A, Subteiny JD: Velopharyngeal function and cleft palate prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1959;9:149-158Baden R: Fundamental principles of orofacial prosthetic therapy in congenital cleft palate. Part II. Prosthetic treatment. J ProsthetDent 1954;4:568-579Eckert SE, Desjardins RP, Taylor TD: Clinical management of the soft palate defect, in Taylor TD (ed): Clinical MaxillofacialProsthetics. Chicago, Quintessence, pp 121-132Harkins CS: Role of the prosthodontist in the rehabilitation of cleft palate patients. J Am Dent Assoc 1951;43:29-33Lloyd RS, Pruzansky S, Subteiny JD: Prosthetic rehabilitation of a cleft palate patient subsequent to multiple surgical and prostheticfailures. J Prosthet Dent 1957;7:216-230Malson TS: Nonobstruction prosthetic speech aid during growth and orthodontic treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1957;7:403-415Mazaheri M: Indications and contraindications for prosthetic speech appliances in cleft palate. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1962;30:663-669Sharma AB, Curtis TA: Clift lip and palate, in Beumer J, Curtis TA, Marunick MT (eds): Maxillofacial Rehabilitation,Prosthodontics and Surgical Considerations. St. Louis, Ishiyaku Euroamerica Inc., 1996, pp 331-376Surgical SplintAramany MA: New trends in construction of splints. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:88-95Bolouri A, Williams CE: Using the existing complete denture as a surgical template. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:129-131Chow TK, Bok WS: New surgical splint for segmental maxillary osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:97-98Fraser-Moodie W: Mr. Gunning and his splint. Brit J Oral Surg 1969;7:112-115Goss AN, Brown RO: An improved Gunning splint. J Prosthet Dent 1975;33:562-566Jerbi FC: Prostheses, Stents and Splints for the Oral Cancer patient. In: Oral care for oral cancer patient. Public Health ServicePub N, 11-12, 1958Kurihara Y, Wakatsuki T, Harada Y, et al: Mandibular alveolar ridge extension method using a surgical splint with poroushydroxyapatite (HAP) particles. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 1991;32:71-79Lambert PM: A two-piece surgical splint to facilitate hydroxylapatite augmentation of the mandibular alveoloar ridge. J OralMaxillofac Surg 1986;44:329-331Laney WR, Gibilisco JA: Diagnosis and Treatment in Prosthodontics. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1983Maxymiw WG, Wood RE, Anderson JD: The immediate role of the dentist in the maxillectomy patient. J Otolaryngol 1989;18:303-305Sabin H, Saltzman E: Intraoral splints for surgical fractures of the mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1970;23:320-326Scuba JR, McLaughlin JP: Simplified splint construction with light-cured resin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:1341-1343Turvey T, Hall DJ, Fish LC, et al: Surgical-orthodontic treatment planning for simultaneous mobilization of the maxilla andmandible in the correction of dentofacial deformities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:491-498Ward GE, Williamson RJ, Robben JO: The use of removable acrylic prostheses to retain mandibular fragments and adjacent softtissues in normal position after surgical resection. Plast Reconstr Surg 1949;4:537Surgical StentFirtell DN, Oatis GW, Curtis, et al: A stent for a split-thickness skin graft vestibuloplasty. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:204-210Golden DP, Schaberg SJ: Comparison of fibrin adhesive and alveolar stent for skin graft fixation in mandibular vestibuloplasty. JCraniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:261-264Jerbi FC: Prostheses, stents and splints for the oral cancer patient, in: Oral care for the oral cancer patient. Public Health ServicePub N 11–12, 1958King GE, Martin JW, Munson TJ: Functional mandibular surgical stents: Use in primary reconstruction of the cancer patient. JProsthet Dent 1983;49:217-219Laney WR, Gibilisco JA: Diagnosis and Treatment in Prosthodontics. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1983Weiner LJ, Moberg AW: An ideal stent for reliable and efficient skin graft application. Ann Plast Surg 1984;13:24-28Yard RA, Latta GH: Fabrication of a sectional surgical stent for hydroxyapatite augmentation for the edentulous residual ridge.J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:482-484Trismus Device (Not for TMD Treatment)Jeckel N, Rakosi T, Joos U: The neuromuscular reaction to continuous dynamic jaw extension in cases with restricted mouthopening. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:94-982010 CDEL Re-recognition of the Specialty Report 134 of 279
December 2005, Supplement, Volume 14, Number 4 95Preface12) Local Anesthesia ParameterCriteria and standards in this section refer specifically and exclusively to methods used by prosthodontiststo control the pain and anxiety of patients treated in outpatient facilities (e.g., dental schools, hospitaloutpatient treatment facilities, prosthodontists’ offices, and other facilities where prosthodontics isaccomplished.)Anxiety, fear, and pain are of concern because each is inherent in the patient’s reaction to the type ofprosthodontic procedure being performed. All three must be controlled satisfactorily during therapy topermit safe and effective completion of the procedures. These anesthesia criteria have been developedto maximize safety and minimize risk in the population of patients being treated. The practitioner’sselection of a particular technique for controlling pain and anxiety during a specific procedure has to beindividually determined for each patient, considering the risks and benefits in each case.Techniques seldom used or applicable to very few patients are not included in this document.This category included hypnosis, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS),and specific medications and techniques for controlling acute or chronic pain. Behavior modificationtechniques (biofeedback) and psychiatric management also have been excluded.Although nitrous oxide–oxygen analgesia and nitrous oxide–oxygen sedation do fit within thedefinition of conscious sedation, we have chosen to exclude them from the techniques of conscioussedation presented here because the risk associated with their use is limited. The standards of careand specialty performance assessment indices (i.e., favorable outcomes, known risks, and complications)are the same as for local anesthesia. Conscious sedation has been shown to be extremely safe. Theminimally depressed state of consciousness-effected, even with the concurrent administration of otherdrugs, causes few physiological changes. However, physiological monitoring of the patient is essential,and the prosthodontist and assistants all should be trained in basic cardiac life support (BCLS) or itsequivalent.In the future, new indications or new anesthetic agents and techniques may lead to changes inequipment. As new pieces of equipment and the techniques for using them are evaluated and acceptedfor use, their inclusion in this document will be considered.When administering anesthetic and/or sedative procedures to a patient, the prosthodontist isencouraged to be familiar with the rules and regulations of his/her individual state dental board and tofollow the guidelines advocated by the American Dental Association.General Criteria and StandardsInformed Consent: The administration of anesthesia must be preceded by the patient’s consent. Informedconsent is obtained after the patient has been informed of the indications for the anesthetic procedure,the goals of treatment, the known benefits and risks of the anesthetic procedure, the factors thatmay affect the known risks and complications, the anesthetic management options, and the favorableoutcomes.Documentation: Parameters of care for prosthodontic procedures include documentation of objectivefindings, diagnosis, and patient management intervention.Coding and NomenclatureDiagnostic and procedural codes have been included in the ACP Parameters of Care only for generalguidance. The codes listed may not be all-inclusive or represent the most current or specific choices. Theinclusion of codes is not meant to supplant the use of current coding books or to relieve practitionersof their obligation to remain current in diagnostic and procedural coding. The ACP Committee onParameters of Care and Committee on Nomenclature do not endorse the use of this document as acoding manual.2010 CDEL Re-recognition of the Specialty Report 135 of 279
Page 1:
COUNCIL ON DENTAL EDUCATION AND LIC
Page 4 and 5:
A. General InformationThe American
Page 7 and 8:
The American College of Prosthodont
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Changes in Scope of PracticeThe Ame
Page 19 and 20:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
ReferencesThe American College of P
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 33 and 34:
ENVISIONED FUTURE~ 10-30 YEAR HORIZ
Page 35 and 36:
Prosthodontists will provide prosth
Page 37 and 38:
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES~ 3-5 YEAR PLAN
Page 39 and 40:
E4. Create effective linkages to fu
Page 41 and 42:
Journal of ProsthodonticsImplant, E
Page 43 and 44:
December 2005, Supplement, Volume 1
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84: December 2005, Supplement, Volume 1
Page 133: December 2005, Supplement, Volume 1
Page 145 and 146: COUNCIL ON DENTAL EDUCATION AND LIC
Page 147 and 148: 28 Cllas$caizon of Complete Edentul
Page 149 and 150: 30 Clmsjfication ofCom&e Edentulirm
Page 151 and 152: 32 Clarszjicatwn ofcomplete Edeiitu
Page 153 and 154: Figure 14. Class Ipatient. (A) Pano
Page 155 and 156: Figure 16. Class KU patient. (A) Pa
Page 157 and 158: 38 Clm$cation of Cumllete EdClass 1
Page 161 and 162: 182 Classification System for Parti
Page 163 and 164: 184 Classification System Jor Parti
Page 165 and 166: 186 Classification Systemfor Partia
Page 167 and 168: 188 Classification System jor Parti
Page 169 and 170: Figure 4. Class IV palienl. Edenlul
Page 171 and 172: I192 Classification Sy stemfor Part
Page 175 and 176: 74 Classification System for the Co
Page 185 and 186:
ORALCANCERSCREENING,EXAMINATIONANDB
Page 187 and 188:
ChrisBornITProjectManagerLomaLindaU
Page 189 and 190:
THOSEATRISKFORORALCANCERWhoisatrisk
Page 191 and 192:
Inaprospectivestudy(NIH‐AARPDieta
Page 193 and 194:
AgedataWhenexaminingdatafrom19agegr
Page 195 and 196:
Whatisthestatusofcommunityscreening
Page 197 and 198:
ReferencesArbesSJ,OlshanAF.CaplanDJ
Page 199 and 200:
THEPROCESSOFONCOGENESISIntroduction
Page 201 and 202:
tightregulationoftranscriptionaleve
Page 203 and 204:
withalloftheotherhallmarksinplace,a
Page 205 and 206:
THERADIOGRAPHICEXAMINATIONCanradiog
Page 207 and 208:
thinningorperforationofthecortices,
Page 209 and 210:
lymphoma)andprimarycarcinomas,areen
Page 211 and 212:
Figure4EffectsonadjacentstructuresW
Page 213 and 214:
fromaprimarylesioninboneorthesoftti
Page 215 and 216:
THEORALCANCERSCREENINGEXAMINATIONTh
Page 217 and 218:
Society’sABCDERule:lookforAsymmet
Page 219 and 220:
Function:Paraesthesia,paralysis,pai
Page 221 and 222:
Examinetheentireheadandneckincludin
Page 223 and 224:
Figure11IntraoralexaminationTheintr
Page 225 and 226:
Figure13Thesoftpalate,uvula,andtons
Page 227 and 228:
Figure15Examinationofthetongueisthe
Page 229 and 230:
Figure18Finally,thefloorofthemouthn
Page 231 and 232:
MANAGEMENTOFSUSPICIOUSORALLESIONSIn
Page 233 and 234:
Tables1through10ThoseatriskTable1 4
Page 235 and 236:
Table3 512010 CDEL Re-recognition o
Page 237 and 238:
Table6 532010 CDEL Re-recognition o
Page 239 and 240:
Table9Table10 552010 CDEL Re-recogn
Page 241 and 242:
CPE Course History From 2000-2010Da
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Accreditation Standards forAdvanced
Page 247 and 248:
Document Revision History (continue
Page 249 and 250:
Mission Statement of theCommission
Page 251 and 252:
PrefaceMaintaining and improving th
Page 253 and 254:
Definitions of Terms Used in Prosth
Page 255 and 256:
Educationally Qualified: An individ
Page 257 and 258:
Intent: Major changes have a direct
Page 259 and 260:
STANDARD 2 - PROGRAM DIRECTOR AND T
Page 261 and 262:
STANDARD 3 - FACILITIES AND RESOURC
Page 263 and 264:
STANDARD 4 - CURRICULUM AND PROGRAM
Page 265 and 266:
Intent: Students will have in depth
Page 267 and 268:
4-18 Students/Residents must be exp
Page 269 and 270:
STANDARD 5 - ADVANCED EDUCATION STU
Page 271 and 272:
STANDARD 6 - RESEARCHAdvanced speci
Page 273 and 274:
2010 CDEL Re-recognition of the Spe
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279:
show all

PROSTHODONTICS - American College of Prosthodontists

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?