13.07.2015 Views

Ancestral Lines of Chester Everts Howell - (PDF ... - Adkinshorton.net

Ancestral Lines of Chester Everts Howell - (PDF ... - Adkinshorton.net

Ancestral Lines of Chester Everts Howell - (PDF ... - Adkinshorton.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BURTHenry Burt came from Harberton in Devonshire, England, a place abouttwenty miles from Plymouth in 1635. He had married Ulalia Marche <strong>of</strong> aHuguenot family living in the neighboring town <strong>of</strong> Deanprior. By 1638 he andhis family were in Roxbury, Massachusetts and in 1640 he went to Springfieldto settle. Here at Springfield he was "clarke <strong>of</strong> the writs" and his signatureand handwriting show he had more than the usual education for a man <strong>of</strong> thosetimes. When he removed from Roxbury, Henry had fourteen children and because<strong>of</strong> the large size <strong>of</strong> his family he was given a larger allotment <strong>of</strong> landthan the others who came at the same time to settle at Springfield. Ulalia hiswife lived until 1690 but Henry died at Springfield in 1662.David Burt born 1632 son <strong>of</strong> Henry ventured up the Connecticut River valleyand lived at Deerfield, a place at that time deep in Indian-held territory. Inthis region it was found that the fort-like houses built for protection were <strong>of</strong>little help in Indian surprise attacks. Two such attacks were so very savagethat their accounts in histories call them the Deerfield "massacres" <strong>of</strong> 1696and <strong>of</strong> 1704.In each <strong>of</strong> these years the Indians descended unexpectedly from the northand without mercy attempted to wipe out the settlement. Two years before theFebruary 1704 raid, Benjamin Burt (1680-1759) son <strong>of</strong> David had marriedSarah, a daughter <strong>of</strong> Daniel Belden <strong>of</strong> Deerfield whose first wife was killed inthe 1696 raid and his second in that <strong>of</strong> 1704.After the raid <strong>of</strong> 1704 Benjamin and Sarah, doubtless glad to be alive, foundthemselves being marched as prisoners <strong>of</strong> the Indians through the forests.Their destination later was learned to be Chambly, Canada. But because <strong>of</strong> thetime <strong>of</strong> the year and the hardships <strong>of</strong> the trail, many <strong>of</strong> the prisoners died beforethis place was reached. However Sarah must have had a wealth <strong>of</strong> physical,mental and moral strength to draw upon, for before the long march was over,she gave birth to her first child, a boy whom they called by the name <strong>of</strong>Christopher. About two years later, friends <strong>of</strong> the Burt and Belden familieseffected a trade <strong>of</strong> prisoners which released Sarah, Benjamin and the baby.They were sent home by boat through the St. Lawrence River and the Atlanticas far as Boston. On shipboard a second child was born whom they appropriatelycalled Seaborn.This safe return to Deerfield was a most remarkable ending to the usualone-way journey <strong>of</strong> an Indian captive. A list has been made <strong>of</strong> the relatives <strong>of</strong>Benjamin and Sarah whose fate was not so happy. This list reveals that betweenthe years 1677 and 1704 the Burt side <strong>of</strong> this family lost nine membersthrough Indian depredations: Benjamin's brothers David and John, three uncles,two cousins and the wife and child <strong>of</strong> a cousin. On Sarah's side <strong>of</strong> the familyher mother was killed in 1696 as were two brothers and a sister. In 1677 two <strong>of</strong>her cousins and the child <strong>of</strong> one were killed. On the march to Canada in 1704her step-mother perished. In all the losses totaled seventeen.30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!