Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing the World Bank Water Resources StrategyT able E.1V ariables in Data File (continued)Variable (field) nameLocal social scientistInternational social scientistpeer reviewCAS consistencyNationwide sectoralinstitutional analysisOther formal institutionsLocal sector institutionsMunicipalities analysisUniversity analysisLocal formal institutionsPrivate sector institutionsState-owned enterpriseLocal informal institutionsSocial conditionalityResettlement-specific socialconditionalityBroader conditionalityEnvironmental assessmentSocial assessment accordingto 4 pillarsAffordabilityMonitoring of socialdevelopment issuesBudget allocated for socialimpact monitoringFunds for baseline surveyFunds available for baseline updateResettlementResettlement action plan availableResettlement action takenResettlement costResettlement cost ($)Indigenous peopleDescriptionIndicates if local social scientists have been involved in design. This is also difficult to assess.Indicates if there have been international social scientists in the peer review of projects. Thisvariable has the same limitations as those listed above.Indicates if the project is linked and consistent with the poverty reduction objective in the CAS. Aproject may be consistent with CAS, but unless it has a direct linkage to poverty reduction objectivein the CAS, this question is coded “no.”Indicates whether nationwide sectoral institutions are analyzed during the appraisal stage.Indicates whether other formal sector institutions analysis is included in appraisal.Indicates whether local sector institutions analysis is included in design.Indicates an analysis of municipalities and/or local governments.Indicates an analysis universities and local intelligentsia.Indicates analysis of other formal local institutions.Indicates institutional analysis of private sector capacity.Indicates institutional analysis of state-owned enterprise.Indicates whether local informal institutions and civil society analysis is included in the project..Indicates whether or not a social conditionality exists in the legal agreement.Indicates if there is a social conditionality in the legal agreement, it is compliance (resettlement,indigenous people, cultural property) specific.Indicates if there is a broader social condition in the legal agreement, than mere compliance issues.Indicates that the project has an environmental assessment.Indicates that the project has an SA as defined by the 4-pillar approach. It may not explicitly stateit, but if the project has all 4 pillars of the SA (social development issues analysis, institutional analysis,participation framework, and impact monitoring) then it is regarded as following the 4-pillar approach.Indicates whether affordability and/or willingness to pay has been calculated for appraisal.Indicates whether there is an explicit monitoring system for social development concerns.Indicates that explicit funds are allocated in budgeting documents for social impact monitoring. If thebudget does not allocate a line item specially for social impact monitoring, the answer is coded as “no.”Indicates that explicit funds are allocated for a baseline survey/study. This is not necessarily sociallyoriented.Indicates that explicit funds are allocated for an update of the baseline monitoring and evaluation.Indicates that the project considers the relevancy of the resettlement issues and mentions them inthe documentation.Indicates that there is a resettlement action plan available in the project document.If resettlement issues are considered but a resettlement action plan (RAP) is not available, what isthe action taken?Is the resettlement cost clearly indicated?If the resettlement and/or land acquisition cost is indicated in the RAP, what is it in US$ (foreign currencyconverted at the rate indicated in the PAD).Indicates that the project considers the relevancy of indigenous people issues.88