Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

More documents

Recommendations

Info

BIBLIOGRAPHYAbernethy, Charles L., Hilmy Sally, Kurt Lonsway,and Chegou Maman. 2000. Farmer-BasedFinancing of Operations in the Niger ValleyIrrigation Schemes. Research Report 37, InternationalWater Management Institute.Colombo.Adams, Adrian. 2000. The River Senegal: FloodManagement and the Future of the Valley.Issue Paper 93. London: International Institutefor Environment and Development.Ahmad, Masood, and Gary P. Kutcher. 1992.Irrigation Planning with Environmental Considerations:A Case Study of Pakistan’s IndusBasin. World Bank Technical Paper 106.Washington, D.C.Alcázar, Lorena, Lixin Colin Xu, and Ana MariaZuluaga. 2000. Institutions, Politics, and Contracts:The Attempt to Privatize the Water andSanitation Utility of Lima, Peru. World BankPolicy Research Working Paper 2478. Washington,D.C.Bandaragoda, D.J. 1999. Institutional Changeand Shared Management of Water Resourcesin Large Canal Systems: Results of an ActionResearch Program in Pakistan. ResearchReport 36, International Water ManagementInstitute. Colombo.Barghouti, Shawki. 2002. “Growing Challengesto Water Resources Management.” SustainableDevelopment International (1) 43–52.Barlow, Maude. 1999. Blue Gold: The GlobalWater Crisis and the Commodification of theWorld’s Water Supply. San Francisco: InternationalForum on Globalization.Barrow, Christopher J. 1998. “River Basin DevelopmentPlanning and Management: A CriticalReview.” World Development 26(1):171–86.Berger, Thomas R. 1994. “The IndependentReview of the Sardar Sarovar Projects,1991–92.” Water Resources Development 10(1):55–66.Berkoff, D. J. W. 1990. Irrigation Managementon the Indo-Gangetic Plain. World Bank TechnicalPaper 129. Washington, D.C.Bhatia, Ramesh, Rita Cestti, and James Winpenny.1995. Water Conservation and Reallocation:Best Practice Cases in ImprovingEconomic Efficiency and EnvironmentalQuality. A World Bank-ODI Joint Study. Washington,D.C.: World Bank.Bird, Ashley, and Riki Therivel. 1996. “Postauditingof Environmental Impact StatementsUsing Data Held in Public Registers of EnvironmentalInformation.” Project Appraisal11(2): 105–16.Black, Maggie. 1998. Learning Water and SanitationCooperation 1978–1998. UNDP-WorldBank Water and Sanitation Program. Washington,D.C.: UNDP-World Bank.Brew, Douglas, and Norman Lee. 1996. “Reviewingthe Quality of Donor Agency EnvironmentalAssessment Guidelines.” ProjectAppraisal 11(2): 79–84.Briscoe, John. 1999a. “The Changing Face ofWater Infrastructure Financing in DevelopingCountries.” Water Resources Development15(3): 301–8.——. 1999b. “The Financing of Hydropower, Irrigationand Water Supply Infrastructure inDeveloping Countries.” Water Resources Development15(4): 459–91.——. 1996. “Water as an Economic Good: The Ideaand What it Means in Practice.” InternationalCommission on Irrigation and Drainage, CairoConference, Special Session R.11: 177–201.——. 1995. The German Water and SewerageSector: How Well It Works and What ThisMeans for Developing Countries. Transportation,Water, and Urban Development Department.Washington, D.C.: Water and SanitationDivision, the World Bank.Byrnes, Kerry J. 1992. “Water Users Associationsin World Bank-Assisted Irrigation Projects inPakistan.” World Bank Technical Paper 173.Washington, D.C.Chowdhury, Mushtaque, Md Jakariya, MdAshiqul H. Tareq, and Jalaluddin Ahmed.1998. “Village Health Workers Can Test TubewellWater for Arsenic.” Dhaka Monday Focus,March 30, 1998.Clarke, Robin. 1991. Water: The InternationalCrisis. London: Earthscan.Correia, Francisco Nunes (ed). 1998. Institutionsfor Water Resources Management inEurope. Rotterdam: Balkerma.Cosgrove, William. 1997. Water Policy ReformProgram. Evaluation Report, Economic109
Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing the World Bank Water Resources StrategyDevelopment Institute. Washington, D.C.:World Bank.Cosgrove William J., and Frank R. Rijsberman.2000. World Water Vision: Making Water Everybody’sBusiness. London: World Water Council.Dayal, Rekha, Christine van Wijk, and NilanjanaMukherjee. 2000. “Methodology for ParticipatoryAssessments: With Communities, Institutionsand Policy Makers.” Water and SanitationProgram. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.de Silva, Samantha. 2000. Community-basedContracting: A Review of Stakeholder Experience.Washington, D.C.: World Bank.DFID (United Kingdom Department for InternationalDevelopment). 1998. Maintaining theValue of Irrigation and Drainage Projects.TDR Project R 6650. London.Donahue, John M., and Barbara Rose Johnston(eds.). 1998. Water, Culture, and Power: LocalStruggles in a Global Context. Washington,D.C.: Island.DSE (German Foundation for InternationalDevelopment). 1998. “Global Water Politics:Cooperation for Transboundary Water Management.”In lst Petersberg Round Tables,International Dialogue Forum. Berlin: DSE.Easter, K. William, Mark W. Rosegrant, and ArielDinar. 1999. “Formal and Informal Markets forWater: Institutions, Performance, and Constraints.”World Bank Research Observer 14(1):99–116.EC (Commission of the European Community).2000. “Communication from the Commissionto the Council, the European Parliament andthe Economic and Social Committee: PricingPolicies for Enhancing the Sustainability ofWater Resources.” Brussels.EDI (Economic Development Institute). 1997.“Capacity Building for Implementing PIM.”International Network on Participatory IrrigationManagement (INPIM) Newsletter 6.Washington, D.C.: World Bank.EIB (European Investment Bank). 1999. An EvaluationStudy of 17 Water Projects LocatedAround the Mediterranean Financed by theEuropean Investment Bank. Luxembourg.El-Ashry, Mohamed T. 1991. “Policies for WaterResource Management in Semi-arid Regions.”Water Resources Development 7(4): 230–34.Ellerman, David. 2000. Hirschmanian Themes ofSocial Learning and Change. World BankPolicy Research Working Paper, Washington,D.C.Eriksen, John, and Roger Poulin. 1993. ContrastingApproaches for Water Policy Developmentin Tunisia and Sri Lanka: LessonsLearned from USAID Mission Experience.USAID ISPAN, Bureau for Asia and the NearEast, Washington, D.C.: AID.Euroconsult, Delft Hydraulics Laboratory, andRoyal Tropical Institute. 1987. Study onOptions and Investment Priorities in IrrigationDevelopment. Synthesis Report. Arnhem, Delft,and Amsterdam.Evans, Alison. 2000. Poverty Reduction in the1990s: An Evaluation of Strategy and Performance.Operations Evaluation DepartmentStudy Series. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Evenson, Robert E., Carl E. Pray, and Mark W.Rosegrant. 1999. Agricultural Research andProductivity Growth in India. Washington,D.C.: International Food Policy ResearchInstitute.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of theUnited Nations). 1997. “Irrigation TechnologyTransfer in Support of Food Security: Proceedingsof a Subregional Workshop inHarare, Zimbabwe, April 14–17, 1997.” WaterReports 14. Rome.——. 1996. Guidelines for Planning Irrigationand Drainage Investment Projects. FAO InvestmentCentre Technical Paper 11. Rome.——. 1995. Water Resources Policy Review andStrategy Formulation. Rome.Faruqee, Rashid. 1995. Structural and PolicyReforms for Agricultural Growth: The Caseof Pakistan. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.Feitelson, Eran, and Marwan Haddad. 1996.Identification of Joint Management Structuresfor Shared Aquifers: A Cooperative Palestinian—IsraeliEffort. World Bank TechnicalPaper 415. Washington, D.C.Foster, Stephen, John Chilton, Marcus Moench,Franklin Cardy, and Manuel Schiffler. 2000.Groundwater in Rural Development: Facingthe Challenges of Supply and Resource Sustainability.”WorldBank Technical Paper 463.Washington, D.C.110
Page 1 and 2:
WORLD BANK OPERATIONS EVALUATION DE
Page 3 and 4:
OPERATIONS EVALUATION DEPARTMENTENH
Page 5 and 6:
Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing
Page 8 and 9:
AcknowledgmentsThis report examines
Page 10 and 11:
ENGLISHFOREWORDThe comprehensiveapp
Page 12 and 13:
Forewordated in early 2000 withinth
Page 14 and 15:
ForewordENGLISHand regional capacit
Page 16:
Forewordregionales, en particularen
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
4Why It’s Difficult toGet Good Re
Page 59 and 60:
Why It’s Difficult to Get Good Re
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
5Improving BankManagement andIntern
Page 67 and 68:
Improving Bank Management and Inter
Page 69 and 70:
6RecommendationsRecommendation 1: A
Page 71:
ANNEXESANNEX A:WORLD BANK OPERATION
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
ANNEX C:SECTOR PERFORMANCE—RECOVE
Page 83 and 84:
Annexesto the “new agenda” for
Page 85: AnnexesBox C.1High Borrower Ownersh
Page 88 and 89: Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing
Page 107 and 108: ANNEX E:SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT DIMENSIO
Page 109 and 110: Annexesments. Per beneficiary costs
Page 111 and 112: Annexesdirectly with the poor and/o
Page 113 and 114: Annexesexisting informal and small-
Page 115 and 116: AnnexesT able E.1V ariables in Data
Page 117 and 118: AnnexesT able E.1V ariables in Data
Page 119 and 120: ANNEX F:RESETTLEMENT IN BANK WATER
Page 121 and 122: ANNEX G:WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
Page 123 and 124: AnnexesFigure G.1Staff Questionnair
Page 129 and 130: ANNEX H:THE DIFFICULTIES OF INTEGRA
Page 131 and 132: Annexesactivities. To mitigate thes
Page 135: Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing
Page 143: Bridging Troubled Waters: Assessing
show all

Download Report - Independent Evaluation Group - World Bank

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?