13.07.2015 Views

Good Confucianism book (pdf) - Department of Physics

Good Confucianism book (pdf) - Department of Physics

Good Confucianism book (pdf) - Department of Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

238 Notes<strong>of</strong> charges is that it is so easily harnessed by politicians to lend respectabilityto their tyrannical ways. … Philosophy usually loses its moral worth whendrafted for dubious political purpose and <strong>Confucianism</strong>, which has much thatis humanist, deserves better than that. ’ However, political leaders in mainlandChina and Singapore are prone to using <strong>Confucianism</strong> selectively to supporttheir own desire for power, and in the process give <strong>Confucianism</strong> generallya bad name ” ; Tamney, Modernization , 80. John Makeham argues that theChinese government ’ s promotion <strong>of</strong> Chinese cultural or traditional values isnot actually closely related to New <strong>Confucianism</strong>. New <strong>Confucianism</strong>, he says,is a separate phenomenon. The equation <strong>of</strong> traditional culture = Chinese - ness= <strong>Confucianism</strong> is to a large extent a response to perceived threats from theWest and a way to define all these things as different from the West. For asummary, see Makeham, Lost , 342f. He goes on to say that “ Academic discourseon ruxue [New <strong>Confucianism</strong>] in China and Taiwan bears little evidence<strong>of</strong> a sustained or robust philosophical creativity in ruxue philosophy ” (344).38 For a description <strong>of</strong> the criticism <strong>of</strong> Zheng Kezhong see Lee Seung - hwan,Topography 55; for a description <strong>of</strong> the criticism by Zhu Riayao, see ibid., 56.39 The Beijing Olympics in 2008 made no mention <strong>of</strong> Mao Zedong, but leanedheavily on the figure <strong>of</strong> Confucius, particularly in the opening ceremonies.Notes to Chapter 131 “ Confucian discourse has been couched under the same rubric <strong>of</strong> ‘ <strong>Confucianism</strong> ’which inadvertently produces a vast range <strong>of</strong> different meanings for thisone term. … Although expressed by the identical signifier <strong>Confucianism</strong>, themeaning <strong>of</strong> Confucian discourse cannot be the same; it is carried out by differentagents in different contexts. What really matters is ‘ who ’ wants to select,distribute, and use ‘ what part <strong>of</strong> the tradition for which purpose ’ ” ; Lee, Seung -hwan Topography, ix – xi.2 See Makeham, Lost , 2.3 See Tu Wei - ming et al., eds., The Confucian World Observed: a ContemporaryDiscussion <strong>of</strong> Confucian Humanism in East Asia (Honolulu: University <strong>of</strong>Hawai ’ i Press, 1992 ), 17.4 For Tu Wei - ming see chapter 12. Robert Neville is Dean <strong>of</strong> the Boston School <strong>of</strong>Theology, see his Boston <strong>Confucianism</strong> (Albany: SUNY, 2000 ). See also JohnBerthrong, “ Boston <strong>Confucianism</strong>: the Third Wave <strong>of</strong> Global <strong>Confucianism</strong>, ”Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecumenical Studies Winter/Spring, 2003 .5 For a fascinating and lively discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>Confucianism</strong> in present - day China,its relationship to society, and the possibilities for its development, see DanielA. Bell, China ’ s New <strong>Confucianism</strong>: Politics and Everyday Life in a ChangingSociety (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008 ).6 Lee Kuan Yew, The Economist , April 27, 1994, 5. Quoted in Richard Madsen,Democracy ’ s Dharma: Religious Renaissance and Political Developments inTaiwan (Berkeley: University <strong>of</strong> California Press, 2007), xx.7 Along with this is a view that one can still frequently encounter, namely thatthe jury system is a terrible idea. It is much better, elitists argue, to be judged

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!