17.07.2015 Views

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the initial period <strong>of</strong> adjustment and transition from a low to high performing <strong>research</strong>environment. In a staged approach towards a <strong>research</strong> oriented university somemore nuanced metrics may be needed to assist the adjustment process.Monitoring is a process <strong>of</strong> <strong>leadership</strong>, collaboration and learning. It should informa transparent process <strong>of</strong> review at regular intervals to establish the degree to whichimprovement has occurred as the basis for making adjustments to the plan. Executiveleaders will also focus on establishing meaningful international benchmarks asa central element <strong>of</strong> monitoring the process. Taking the initiative in identifying asustained program <strong>of</strong> benchmarking provides the <strong>executive</strong> leader with a significantopportunity to cultivate a productive and rewarding competitive environment.Support excellent <strong>research</strong> wherever it is foundFor universities with limited <strong>research</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>iles direct intervention from the <strong>executive</strong>leader may be needed to support individuals and groups in specialist areas withnotable track records or promise to take advantage <strong>of</strong> opportunities as theyarise. There is also a more general positive effect from this strategy: it signals thatpotentially strong individual initiatives will be encouraged even where they areoutside the priority areas. It also confirms that the <strong>research</strong> plan is flexible and that<strong>development</strong> funding is available to support ongoing areas <strong>of</strong> excellence as well asfor promising new initiatives.Where there is <strong>research</strong> from small groups or individuals that is clearly excellentaccording to national and international benchmarks, the <strong>executive</strong> leader <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong><strong>development</strong> should make a careful assessment <strong>of</strong> the potential value for theuniversity in supporting the activities with appropriate resources and other forms <strong>of</strong>support. Some <strong>of</strong> these people may have strong international reputations that mayat some point lead to a concentration <strong>of</strong> activity. They may be working in new areaswith potential for expansion with the right support and incentives but there is a riskthat their work is overshadowed by the attention given to the strategically alignedprograms and projects. Retaining these <strong>research</strong>ers may require some specificinitiatives in the rewards system including promotion. The <strong>executive</strong> leader mightconsider ways <strong>of</strong> ensuring that these people are properly acknowledged and thattheir work is fostered, valued in its own right, and acknowledged as evidence <strong>of</strong> the<strong>research</strong>-orientation.Focus 2 — Taking an assertive-participative approach to <strong>leadership</strong>43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!