17.07.2015 Views

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

When faced with the challenging task <strong>of</strong> reducing <strong>research</strong> centres and programs<strong>executive</strong> leaders <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> focus first and foremost on clear and unequivocalevidence <strong>of</strong> recent trends in performance relative to benchmarks. Low performanceneeds to be addressed with frankness and options for <strong>development</strong> includingalternative pathways and support mechanisms for individuals. Where projectsare lagging but the <strong>research</strong>ers are highly capable the <strong>research</strong> leaders shouldendeavour to steer the <strong>research</strong> in a new direction. There is a strong case for peoplecontinuing to pursue their academic interests where they built connections betweenareas <strong>of</strong> strength in <strong>research</strong> and teaching, including <strong>research</strong> to inform teaching.The strategies <strong>of</strong> accelerating areas <strong>of</strong> strength and reframing low performing areaswith potential both carry risks <strong>of</strong> the <strong>research</strong> programs not measuring up to thechallenge. Any number <strong>of</strong> factors can conspire to undermine the good intentions.Highly successful <strong>executive</strong> leaders in <strong>research</strong> productive universities allow for risk,indeed they create room for flexibility in structures and regulations to encouragefaculties, <strong>research</strong> centres and <strong>research</strong>ers to be entrepreneurial. The risk points aretolerated and rewarded, as long as they meet the outcomes that are set.Enable <strong>research</strong> leaders to maintain their <strong>research</strong> activity at thehighest levelThe academics identified as <strong>research</strong> leaders will be amongst the most productive<strong>research</strong>ers in the university. The <strong>executive</strong> leader <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> should not overlookthe direct contribution these people make to the <strong>research</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> the university as<strong>research</strong>ers. The <strong>leadership</strong> roles and the multitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>development</strong> activities they areinvolved in should not interfere with their own <strong>research</strong> programs. Time and space tomaintain a consistent workflow is usually the main issue.A notable predictor <strong>of</strong> the publication success <strong>of</strong> university departments is the head <strong>of</strong>department’s record. 24 Not only should this be a factor in policy for recruitment andinternal appointments, it can also be supported in real terms including additionalallowances for personal <strong>research</strong> assistance, time to present <strong>research</strong> findings atconferences, and support to engage in review processes. Direct support in the form<strong>of</strong> small grants from the <strong>executive</strong> leader’s discretionary fund will assist the head <strong>of</strong>department to maintain their <strong>research</strong> and publication productivity, and have theadded impact <strong>of</strong> sending a message to new and prospective academics that good<strong>leadership</strong> should not compromise good <strong>research</strong>.56 A <strong>handbook</strong> for <strong>executive</strong> <strong>leadership</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>development</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!