17.07.2015 Views

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CREATING A CULTURE WHERE EVERYONE TAKESRESEARCH SERIOUSLYThe University <strong>of</strong> PortsmouthPrior to establishing the role <strong>of</strong> Director <strong>of</strong> Research it was not possible atthe University <strong>of</strong> Portsmouth to assess performance and progress towards<strong>research</strong> goals. The first task for the newly appointed Director was toestablish clear expectations for academics by driving change with anambitious target <strong>of</strong> increasing <strong>research</strong> income by 20 per cent over fiveyears. A working group was set up to conduct a scoping study <strong>of</strong> strengthsand weaknesses in relation to the external environment. The <strong>leadership</strong>decided on the final vision and themes to guide the <strong>research</strong> strategyfollowed by further consultation on the outcomes <strong>of</strong> the working group.The transformation process was particularly influenced by a collaborativeapproach to developing strategy and action plans, underpinned bycentral investment in thematic <strong>research</strong> networks with internal funding thatinvolved bidding.The Director prepared a paper on how to put a new strategic plantogether and consulted up and down. Action plans for each faculty werethen developed, each based on a central strategy containing six corethemes. The plans included targets. In collaboration with faculties thisalso involved constructing a definition <strong>of</strong> ‘what makes a <strong>research</strong> activeacademic’. Since it varies by subject area they wrote their own. Makingexternal appointments <strong>of</strong> deans helped to ensure that active <strong>research</strong>erswere selected when recruiting.The approach <strong>of</strong> the <strong>executive</strong> leader also included: gaining strongcorporate buy-in; removing systemic obstacles to success: using peerreview, mentoring, and rewards; recruiting active <strong>research</strong>ers and expertsfrom outside; and devolving <strong>leadership</strong>. Careful monitoring <strong>of</strong> quality<strong>of</strong> external funding applications is an essential element <strong>of</strong> the strategyusing a peer review college and band <strong>of</strong> reviewers for all substantialgrant bids. One <strong>of</strong> the more challenging themes in the <strong>research</strong> strategyis to integrate education and <strong>research</strong>. This is being achieved partly byinvolving top <strong>research</strong>ers in teaching and introducing <strong>research</strong> internshipsfor undergraduate students.Focus 2 — Taking an assertive-participative approach to <strong>leadership</strong>51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!