17.07.2015 Views

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

through effective and efficient administrative systems and the high quality staff tomanage them.It is generally preferable to recruit pr<strong>of</strong>essional managers with expertise andinterest in the <strong>research</strong> enterprise. Without overstating the point, understandingthe nature and purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong>, and appreciating the diverse ways academicsgo about doing <strong>research</strong>, not to mention their work motives and values, is anadvantage. Research managers with these perspectives and outlooks are betterequipped to respond to local, national and international policy changes, fundingand collaborative opportunities, and general trends in <strong>research</strong> and innovation.They will have a clearer sense <strong>of</strong> priorities in supporting improvements in<strong>research</strong> performance.Create highly responsive <strong>research</strong> management processes and systemsThe influence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>executive</strong> leader on <strong>research</strong> performance extends to everycontact point between the university <strong>research</strong> and <strong>development</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice, and thefaculties, centres and <strong>research</strong>ers. In the initial phase <strong>of</strong> implementing the changeagenda the <strong>executive</strong> leader should aim to take the <strong>research</strong> management processesand systems rapidly to a new level, with roles and functions explicitly derived fromand supporting the vision and coordinating goals.“For new universities it’s important that thecommercialisation <strong>of</strong>fice and consultingpolicies actually support <strong>research</strong>productivity rather than distract from itand this gets back to deciding what’s themain game for the university. Consultingcan distract from the core purposes <strong>of</strong> theuniversity. This can be managed throughperformance planning and the reviewprocess as well as a good consulting policy.”The exercise in reframing or renewing<strong>research</strong> management will requiresome radical action to stimulate andsupport the culture change. This<strong>of</strong>ten includes reducing the number<strong>of</strong> people intervening in the <strong>research</strong>process and ensuring the effectivenessand efficiency <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> policies andprocedures and the electronic systemsthat support their implementation.It takes considerable time and resources to change the attitudes and behaviours <strong>of</strong>underperforming management staff and systems. Successful <strong>executive</strong> leaders <strong>of</strong><strong>research</strong> take a direct interest in reshaping the ethos from a negative service cultureand aim to remove systemic obstacles and impediments to <strong>research</strong> performance.It is not unusual in cases where the <strong>research</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> a university has declined62 A <strong>handbook</strong> for <strong>executive</strong> <strong>leadership</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>development</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!