17.07.2015 Views

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

handbook-executive-leadership-of-research-development-pdf-v10

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TARGETING STRATEGIC SUPPORT TO BUILD ON STRENGTHSSouthern Cross UniversityImproving overall <strong>research</strong> performance at Southern Cross University startedwith an initial five-year change process stimulated by successive vicechancellorswho have had a particularly strong influence on the directions andthe change process. The University set out to differentiate its approach fromother universities. The change process included a shift in the internal budgetallocation to <strong>research</strong> aimed at increasing the productivity in the areas that theUniversity knew it was good at. Some areas targeted for a significant shift inperformance had been working towards national and international standingfor over a decade: the last five years provided them with a marked step-upin <strong>research</strong> activity. At the same time an opportunistic approach by senior<strong>executive</strong> encouraged some areas to come out <strong>of</strong> left field.The strategic actions to build on these <strong>development</strong>s included establishinggood industrial linkages: the University decided that it was important to try forlarger grants and industry was the best potential source. The University has alsomade a point <strong>of</strong> looking for long-term relationships with a small number <strong>of</strong>institutions <strong>of</strong> the same kind. The relationships are not just faculty-to-faculty butuniversity wide, and since they are multi-stranded are more likely to endure.Strategic support was also focused on recruiting <strong>research</strong> active staff; theDeputy Vice-Chancellor takes a direct role in selection panels for new staffto ensure that appointees have strong <strong>research</strong> records. These appointmentsset up a positive cycle <strong>of</strong> attracting and retaining high quality post-doctoralstudents. With that came new approaches to performance management tosend clear signals through promotions and work allocations that <strong>research</strong> isvalued. The University has a continuous review process in place where thoseareas not doing so well are identified and new targets set. Higher degrees havebeen the subject <strong>of</strong> particular attention with steps to lift the whole pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong>higher degree <strong>research</strong> and the impact that it has on the <strong>research</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> theinstitution.84 A <strong>handbook</strong> for <strong>executive</strong> <strong>leadership</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>research</strong> <strong>development</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!