05.12.2012 Views

C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb

C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb

C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

27. Provisions<br />

Environmental remediation<br />

The Company makes provisions for environmental cleanup<br />

requirements, largely resulting from historical solid and<br />

hazardous waste handling and disposal practices at its<br />

facilities. Environmental remediation provisions exist at<br />

the following sites and are discounted according to the<br />

timeline of expected payments:<br />

Cambridge, OH USA<br />

The largest issues at the Cambridge, Ohio site relate<br />

to a 1997 permanent injunction consent order (“PICO”)<br />

entered into with the State of Ohio and Cyprus Foote<br />

Mineral Company, the former owner of the site. While<br />

AMG’s US subsidiary and Cyprus Foote are jointly liable,<br />

the Company has agreed to perform and be liable for the<br />

remedial obligations. The site contains two on-site slag<br />

piles that are the result of many years of production.<br />

Under the PICO, these slag piles were required to be<br />

capped, thereby lowering the radioactive emissions from<br />

the piles.<br />

Remediation plans were finalized with the State of Ohio<br />

during 2003 and the Company completed all work for this<br />

remediation in 2009. In addition to the capital spending<br />

required for the actual cap on the slag piles, the Company<br />

has reserved for ongoing operations and maintenance<br />

expenses (“O&M”) at the site. This O&M is required<br />

120 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements<br />

Environmental<br />

remediation Restructuring Warranty<br />

Project<br />

costs<br />

Partial<br />

retirement Other Total<br />

Balance at January 1, 2009 13,860 3,589 9,291 4,307 1,211 2,928 35,186<br />

Discontinued operations in opening (a) (4,805) (1,673) – – – – (6,478)<br />

Provisions made during the period 3,998 7,782 6,462 2,256 397 440 21,335<br />

Provisions used during the period (1,352) (2,971) (567) (1,458) (585) (1,420) (8,353)<br />

Increase due to discounting 1,923 – – – – – 1,923<br />

<strong>Cu</strong>rrency and reversals 284 (1,611) (1,529) (1,541) 29 (1,297) (5,665)<br />

Balance at December 31, 2009 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />

Balance at January 1, 2010 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />

Provisions made during the period 6,421 423 5,869 4,022 1,421 283 18,439<br />

Provisions used during the period (664) (3,950) (1,421) (1,238) (1,745) (337) (9,355)<br />

Decrease due to discounting (671) – – – – – (671)<br />

<strong>Cu</strong>rrency, transfers and reversals 1,088 (283) (5,902) (1,425) 1,537 (65) (5,050)<br />

Balance at December 31, 2010 20,082 1,306 12,203 4,923 2,265 532 41,311<br />

Non-current 13,641 401 – – 522 298 14,862<br />

<strong>Cu</strong>rrent 267 4,715 13,657 3,564 530 353 23,086<br />

Balance at December 31, 2009 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />

Non-current 18,415 693 – – 1,288 211 20,607<br />

<strong>Cu</strong>rrent 1,667 613 12,203 4,923 977 321 20,704<br />

Balance at December 31, 2010 20,082 1,306 12,203 4,923 2,265 532 41,311<br />

(a) See Note 6 for detail of discontinued operations.<br />

to be provided for 1,000 years and is expected to cost<br />

$44,700 on an undiscounted basis. Other environmental<br />

items requiring provision include: wetlands remediation,<br />

stormwater remediation and maintenance. These projects<br />

are expected to create cash outflows of $695, on an<br />

undiscounted basis, and are expected to be completed<br />

within the next 15 years.<br />

Newfield, NJ USA<br />

Another one of the Company’s US subsidiaries has entered<br />

into administrative consent orders with the New Jersey<br />

Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”)<br />

under which the US subsidiary must conduct remediation<br />

activities at the Newfield facility. <strong>Si</strong>nce the initial<br />

administrative consent order was signed in 1997, many<br />

of the obligations have been completed.<br />

In January 2006, the US subsidiary entered into a fixed<br />

price remediation contract with TRC Companies Inc.<br />

(“TRC”), whereby TRC assumes primary responsibility<br />

for all non-radiological groundwater environmental<br />

remediation obligations at the Newfield facility, with<br />

certain exceptions for one contaminant, perchlorate. The<br />

initiation of this remediation contract also led to a new<br />

Administrative Consent Order (“ACO”) that was signed in<br />

<strong>Fe</strong>bruary 2006. This ACO specifically designated TRC as<br />

the entity primarily responsible for the non-radiological<br />

contamination and also specifically cited the US subsidiary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!