C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb
C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb
C Si Ni Cr V Ti Ta Sc Li Sr Zr Fe Cu Zn Sn B Al Ce U Mn Mo Nb Sb
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
27. Provisions<br />
Environmental remediation<br />
The Company makes provisions for environmental cleanup<br />
requirements, largely resulting from historical solid and<br />
hazardous waste handling and disposal practices at its<br />
facilities. Environmental remediation provisions exist at<br />
the following sites and are discounted according to the<br />
timeline of expected payments:<br />
Cambridge, OH USA<br />
The largest issues at the Cambridge, Ohio site relate<br />
to a 1997 permanent injunction consent order (“PICO”)<br />
entered into with the State of Ohio and Cyprus Foote<br />
Mineral Company, the former owner of the site. While<br />
AMG’s US subsidiary and Cyprus Foote are jointly liable,<br />
the Company has agreed to perform and be liable for the<br />
remedial obligations. The site contains two on-site slag<br />
piles that are the result of many years of production.<br />
Under the PICO, these slag piles were required to be<br />
capped, thereby lowering the radioactive emissions from<br />
the piles.<br />
Remediation plans were finalized with the State of Ohio<br />
during 2003 and the Company completed all work for this<br />
remediation in 2009. In addition to the capital spending<br />
required for the actual cap on the slag piles, the Company<br />
has reserved for ongoing operations and maintenance<br />
expenses (“O&M”) at the site. This O&M is required<br />
120 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements<br />
Environmental<br />
remediation Restructuring Warranty<br />
Project<br />
costs<br />
Partial<br />
retirement Other Total<br />
Balance at January 1, 2009 13,860 3,589 9,291 4,307 1,211 2,928 35,186<br />
Discontinued operations in opening (a) (4,805) (1,673) – – – – (6,478)<br />
Provisions made during the period 3,998 7,782 6,462 2,256 397 440 21,335<br />
Provisions used during the period (1,352) (2,971) (567) (1,458) (585) (1,420) (8,353)<br />
Increase due to discounting 1,923 – – – – – 1,923<br />
<strong>Cu</strong>rrency and reversals 284 (1,611) (1,529) (1,541) 29 (1,297) (5,665)<br />
Balance at December 31, 2009 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />
Balance at January 1, 2010 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />
Provisions made during the period 6,421 423 5,869 4,022 1,421 283 18,439<br />
Provisions used during the period (664) (3,950) (1,421) (1,238) (1,745) (337) (9,355)<br />
Decrease due to discounting (671) – – – – – (671)<br />
<strong>Cu</strong>rrency, transfers and reversals 1,088 (283) (5,902) (1,425) 1,537 (65) (5,050)<br />
Balance at December 31, 2010 20,082 1,306 12,203 4,923 2,265 532 41,311<br />
Non-current 13,641 401 – – 522 298 14,862<br />
<strong>Cu</strong>rrent 267 4,715 13,657 3,564 530 353 23,086<br />
Balance at December 31, 2009 13,908 5,116 13,657 3,564 1,052 651 37,948<br />
Non-current 18,415 693 – – 1,288 211 20,607<br />
<strong>Cu</strong>rrent 1,667 613 12,203 4,923 977 321 20,704<br />
Balance at December 31, 2010 20,082 1,306 12,203 4,923 2,265 532 41,311<br />
(a) See Note 6 for detail of discontinued operations.<br />
to be provided for 1,000 years and is expected to cost<br />
$44,700 on an undiscounted basis. Other environmental<br />
items requiring provision include: wetlands remediation,<br />
stormwater remediation and maintenance. These projects<br />
are expected to create cash outflows of $695, on an<br />
undiscounted basis, and are expected to be completed<br />
within the next 15 years.<br />
Newfield, NJ USA<br />
Another one of the Company’s US subsidiaries has entered<br />
into administrative consent orders with the New Jersey<br />
Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”)<br />
under which the US subsidiary must conduct remediation<br />
activities at the Newfield facility. <strong>Si</strong>nce the initial<br />
administrative consent order was signed in 1997, many<br />
of the obligations have been completed.<br />
In January 2006, the US subsidiary entered into a fixed<br />
price remediation contract with TRC Companies Inc.<br />
(“TRC”), whereby TRC assumes primary responsibility<br />
for all non-radiological groundwater environmental<br />
remediation obligations at the Newfield facility, with<br />
certain exceptions for one contaminant, perchlorate. The<br />
initiation of this remediation contract also led to a new<br />
Administrative Consent Order (“ACO”) that was signed in<br />
<strong>Fe</strong>bruary 2006. This ACO specifically designated TRC as<br />
the entity primarily responsible for the non-radiological<br />
contamination and also specifically cited the US subsidiary