Occupation

Interview with Raja Shehadehthing. You can never feel that this has been achieved and then say ‘Okay, I can gohome now and take a break’. It’s a constant struggle.When the PLO first came here, their attitude was: ‘Okay, you people whowere working on human rights, you are part of the resistance against the Israelioccupation; now the resistance should be stopped because we have reached anagreement with Israel. Go home.’ Literally, that was their position.Then we explained that this was not going to happen because now therewere new challenges and the Palestinian Authority was part of it. They were rathersurprised, because they did not come from places where they would haveexperienced that kind of work. But I think that now a positive change has takenplace. They realize that human rights work is an important safeguard and helps inthe healthy development of society. So every year we’ve been going to the PrimeMinister and the President of the Palestinian Authority to report on thesituation – sometimes we also go in the course of the year – and we are alwaysreceived very politely and they listen. This at least is positive. I think it has beenpossible to have some influence in the civil rights sphere.What worries me is something else. The Palestinian police commitviolations, but the present system is more responsive to our appeals against theseviolations. However, the security forces are another matter because it’s not clear whothey are accountable to, and their structure is not clear. It is also not clear which lawsthey apply. They seem to operate as though they are above the law.One example is the case of civil servants. The security services, theMukhabarat (‘intelligence agency’), insist that civil servants need clearance fromthem and that if they decide someone is not politically favourable, so-and-so will bedismissed from their work. There have been at least 100 cases of people who wereaccepted for employment as teachers in government schools, had started their work,had even in some cases gotten a positive review, and then were dismissed simplybecause the security services wanted them dismissed. The Human RightsCommission went to the Palestinian High Court to appeal against the decision fortheir dismissal, and it is a perfectly good case because the law does not allow fordismissal on those grounds. And this has taken – how long is it now? At least twoyears. And the High Court is unable or perhaps does not dare to decide on thematter. Every time we take the report, go to the people in power, and tell them: ‘Youare always speaking about the importance of an independent judiciary and the ruleof law, and this is the case in point. You must resolve it.’ Yet nothing happens; it hasstill not been resolved. 4There are some improvements. Certainly some action has been takenagainst corruption. They’re trying to improve the judiciary. But it’s still veryworrisome because once a police state is entrenched, it’s very difficult todismantle it.There are also problems of attacks on human rights activists. The trend isneither totally negative nor totally positive; it can swing both ways. So sometimes thepolice authorities and the security services allow visits to prisons under their control,4 The High Court eventually decided in favour of the petitioners on 3 September 2012.22