APRILFeedback

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COURSE GRADINGElement Percent of Due DateCourse GradeSession Test (10) 15%Midterm Test 10%Final Exam 15%Film Crew Project 15%Dub/Digitize Project 5% March 10Rough Cut Project 10% March 17Trimmer Project 10% March 31Final or FX Cut Project 10% April 14In this example, the editing portion of the production is subdivided into four gradedstages with specific due dates. One difficulty that can arise with this approach occurswhen students, on a wild roll, complete one stage and charge onto the next withoutsaving a version of the first for evaluation! Reminding these rampant editors to pauseand save is an ongoing lecture component.It is also difficult, as mentioned earlier, to redirect students’ thinking and workingmethods towards the specific parameters of a particular stage; during the rough cutphase it is hard to resist the compulsion to trim or add transitions. This is the mindsetholdover from linear video, “an orthodoxy of presumptions that are based in the linearmode of the editorial process and, consequently, the story-telling process. That iswrong.” (Ohanian)The conflicting ends and ideals that exist between the open nature of digital mediaand the need to discourage academic dishonesty will keep those in digital productioncourse instruction off guard and looking for balance. The most unobstructive solutionsfor imaging and video appear to be pedagogical rather than technological. Breakingout, delimiting, and distributing scrutiny of student progress throughout the course isone solution that both obstructs plagiarism and stimulates nonlinear thinking increative production.Note: This article appeared in a 2002 issue of Feedback but complications preventedthe entire article from appearing in print. This is the entire article.34Feedback April 2003 (Vol. 44, No. 2)
ReferencesAndersen, Espen. (Feb 1996 ). Battling plagiarism: discussion of the December 1995article, Plagiarism in the Web. Communications of the ACM v 39 p.11-12Bushweller, Kevin. (March 1999). Digital Deception: The Internet makes cheatingeasier than ever. Electronic School. National School Boards Association.Denning, Peter J. (Dec 1995 ). Plagiarism in the Web. Communications of the ACMv. 38 p.29.Renard, Lisa. (Dec. 1999/Jan. 2000). Cut and paste 101: plagiarism and the Net.Educational Leadership v. 57 no4. p.38-42.Index Stock Imagery and Digimarc Partner To Protect Photographer’s Copyrights OnThe Web. (April 3, 2000). Digimarc press release.Ohanian, Thomas A. (1993). Digital Nonlinear Editing. Stoneham, MA: FocalPress. p. 153Utley, Alison. (July 16 1999). Techno cheats bedevil sector. The Times HigherEducation Supplement no1393 p.1.BEA—Educating tomorrow’s electronic media professionals 35
Page 1 and 2: Educating tomorrow’selectronic me
Page 3 and 4: CONTENTSESSAYTransitionsRalph J. Be
Page 5 and 6: ESSAYTRANSITIONSBy Ralph J. Begleit
Page 7 and 8: party. It was a fabulous experience
Page 9 and 10: een accustomed to leaving my “whe
Page 11 and 12: ADVISING:THE LITTLE SECRET HIDDEN I
Page 13 and 14: • Total intake model—all studen
Page 15 and 16: Response to the survey has never re
Page 17 and 18: assessment of the Center in conclus
Page 19 and 20: SENSE-MAKING AND THE PERSONALVIDEO
Page 21 and 22: database. A limited implementation
Page 23 and 24: RESEARCHTHE PARTICIPATION OF WOMENI
Page 25 and 26: Local newsroom employmentIn July 20
Page 27 and 28: the referral source of each person
Page 30 and 31: Discussion and ConclusionsOur analy
Page 32 and 33: Lind, R. A., & Braun, M. J. (1996,
Page 34 and 35: downloading services. www.schoolsuc
Page 36 and 37: major professional selling points i
Page 40 and 41: REVIEWHyde, Stuart (2003). Idea to
Page 42 and 43: The primary purpose of this study i
Page 44 and 45: detailing the number of phone numbe
Page 46 and 47: these newscasts that “primary”
Page 48 and 49: As Table 1.3 shows, comparing only
Page 50 and 51: RESEARCHACCURACY IN LOCAL TELEVISIO
Page 52 and 53: anked 26 to 50. After eliminating n
Page 54 and 55: 2. How often do news sources compla
Page 56 and 57: Participants were asked which one m
Page 58 and 59: These stations still archive script
Page 60 and 61: TABLE 12002 BEA News Division stude
Page 62 and 63: Eiles at WCHS-TV, Portland, Maine.
Page 64 and 65: ESSAYWHAT’S OLD IS NEW AGAIN:THE
Page 66 and 67: are. If the news agency editor or r
Page 68 and 69: said Sagan, just as broadcast chann
Page 70 and 71: “We’re perfectly positioned to
Page 72 and 73: John Miller, News Director of KTVT-
Page 74 and 75: CLASSROOMGUEST SPEAKERS IN BROADCAS
Page 76 and 77: students just starting out, their m
Page 78 and 79: professionals, often with varied jo
Page 80 and 81: District NewsTo the members of Dist
Page 82 and 83: several held on college campuses. I
Page 84 and 85: 2ND PLACE: Jillian Oppegard, Colora
Page 86 and 87: Faculty News CompetitionC.A. Tuggle
Page 88 and 89:
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE: Kevin Hager, W
Page 90 and 91:
BEA PRESIDENT’S MESSAGEGOALS AND
Page 92:
THANK YOU to the following individu
show all

APRILFeedback

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?