The affiliates believe the NAB should now be working for “clean” legislation thatwould reinstate the 35% cap. By “clean,” they mean legislation without otherregulations they don’t want but many lawmakers do. There has been talk aboutcoupling the 35% provision to tightening up other just-relaxed restrictions or toreduced license-renewal periods, tougher indecency enforcement, free time for politicalcandidates, and other troubling fare.Because of those potential add-ons, Fritts thinks pushing for 35% legislation is toorisky. Fritts would like to believe such “clean” legislation might pass the House (as itdid last week) and Senate. But he is pragmatic enough to fear that somewhere alongthe line, perhaps in the wee hours of a cold October night during a conference toreconcile House and Senate bills, the bad stuff could be added.So, two weeks ago, Fritts got himself into hot water when he announced the NABwould oppose all legislation and sent word to NAB’s friends on Capitol Hill. Theaffiliates were not happy. They felt Fritts had abandoned the clean 35% effort way tooearly, and they let him know it. With their own team of lobbyists and Washington reps,the affiliates continued to work for the clean 35% bill in the House and, to the surpriseof many, got it. (When newspapers reported last week that broadcasters suffered astunning loss on Capitol Hill, they missed more than half the story. For many stations,it was a big victory.)The latest word from the Senate is that it will produce a companion bill. For the firsttime, Washington insiders are saying that a clean 35% law is possible, despite PresidentBush’s veto threat.I agree with Fritts that the NAB should walk way from the 35% bill. Fritts’s warningis real. And to win passage, affiliates have to go into debt to lawmakers hostile to theirbusiness. They will one day collect on that debt.Then again, I don’t work for the Barrett-Fisher-Frank triumvirate. Fritts does.BEA—Educating tomorrow’s electronic media professionals 62
ESSAY‘BIG’ ISN’T ‘BAD’Bob Wright, Chairman & CEO of NBC,Vice Chairman, GEThis article originally appeared in The Wall Street Journal, July 23, 2003.It is reprinted here with permission.Unfortunately, the public discourse on important issues sometimes becomesuntethered from fact and reason.Such is the case with the response to the FCC’s expansion of the national televisionstation ownership cap, which would allow a single entity to own stations that have apotential reach of 45% rather than 35% of the national TV audience.Rep. David Obey (D-Wis.) expressed the sentiments of many recently when he said:“I don’t want ownership factors to get in the way of districts like mine from being ableto have their own cultural attitudes.” But the FCC’s modest adjustment of ownershiprules does not mean the silencing of local voices under the weight of monolithic mediacompanies. On the contrary, the record shows that local voices, as measured by theamount and quality of local news and public-affairs programming, increase whennetworks such as NBC take operating control of television stations.Views such as Rep. Obey’s reflect a politically convenient populism that equates “big”with “bad.” There are a number of mistaken assumptions at work here: 1) that thecorporate parent of a broadcast station dictates its point of view or “cultural attitude”;2) that the alternative to a station’s being owned by a broadcast network is ownershipby a mom-and-pop enterprise with offices above the five-and-dime on Main Street; 3)that such a small owner is better able to present a distinctive “voice” in the communitythan is a large media company.In fact, the location of a media company’s home offices has nothing to do with its“voice.” Station owners are in the business of appealing to their local audiences. Theydo that by serving their communities the best way they know how. In NBC’s case, thismeans providing a local station with superior newsgathering and technical resourcesthat enable it to enhance and extend its local programming. This is good for thecommunity, and it is good business. A smaller owner, with more limited resources, is alltoo often forced to jettison expensive local news coverage in favor of less expensiveprogramming imported from national syndicators.Moreover, if a broadcast network is prohibited from owning a station in a desirablemarket, the owner is unlikely to be a small, locally based company. It will instead be alarge, diversified media company like Belo, Gannett, Hearst-Argyle, Scripps, or theWashington Post. It defies logic to claim that, in the name of “localism,” the $6 billionGannett Co., the Arlington-based owner of 100 daily newspapers and 22 televisionstations, should have freedom to expand its TV stations business but NBC, ABC, CBS,and Fox should not.63Feedback September 2003 (Vol. 44, No. 4)
- Page 5 and 6:
The Telecommunication Arts degree p
- Page 7 and 8:
principally studying in the evening
- Page 9 and 10:
Appendix ADepartment of Telecommuni
- Page 11 and 12: WTBUa. Digitalb. Maintenancec. Repl
- Page 13 and 14: Appendix BI. Telecommunication Arts
- Page 15 and 16: Please be aware of the following: I
- Page 17 and 18: B. In-training Courses1. Initiation
- Page 19 and 20: IX. WTBU-TV MissionA. To serve as a
- Page 21 and 22: CLASSROOMEMAILING THE NEWS: RADIONE
- Page 23 and 24: WOUB, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio
- Page 25 and 26: • use software designed for writi
- Page 27 and 28: Final Grading Scale for the Semeste
- Page 29 and 30: Oct 23 Act I Script conference and
- Page 31 and 32: Rationale and MethodIn speaking to
- Page 33 and 34: dubs from a clean Beta or DVCPRO ma
- Page 35 and 36: y stating, “I would rather see a
- Page 37 and 38: I like the montages on a tape first
- Page 39 and 40: and regions of the country, consist
- Page 41 and 42: Commission] may revoke any station
- Page 43 and 44: The new law also declared, “The F
- Page 45 and 46: have written policies regarding can
- Page 47 and 48: 3) How did you handle such requests
- Page 49 and 50: academic publishers have considered
- Page 51 and 52: CLASSROOMHOW BROADCAST STUDENTS DES
- Page 53 and 54: “character” of the desired acti
- Page 55 and 56: mood, tempo, and intellect. The sty
- Page 57 and 58: should be the natural result of the
- Page 59 and 60: DiscussionThose who teach scriptwri
- Page 61: ESSAYTHE MAN IN THE MIDDLE:EDDIE FR
- Page 65 and 66: OUTSIDE THE CLASSROOMBROADCASTERS-I
- Page 67 and 68: • A voice over (VO) by Jason Broc
- Page 69 and 70: Mike Latta, Chief Photographer. “
- Page 71 and 72: REVIEWFrankland, M. (2002). Radio m
- Page 73 and 74: BEA NEWS2004 Convention Program Cha
- Page 75 and 76: BEA NEWSChairman, Founder of CMU’
- Page 77 and 78: BEA NEWSIndiana Moves More Courses
- Page 79: THANK YOU to the following individu