01.09.2015 Views

A Path to Prosperity New Directions for African Livestock

GALVmed Impetus Strategy Paper

GALVmed Impetus Strategy Paper

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3 The Competitiveness<br />

of Lives<strong>to</strong>ck Production<br />

<strong>African</strong> lives<strong>to</strong>ck production remains highly<br />

un-competitive in global terms. Several<br />

parameters reflect this:<br />

> Lives<strong>to</strong>ck yields are relatively low, <strong>for</strong> example:<br />

• Young weaned cattle gain no more than 50 kg<br />

per year in the transhumant system in West<br />

Africa, which means that it takes five or six<br />

years <strong>to</strong> produce a 250-kg animal 125 .<br />

• Sub-Saharan Africa records the lowest milk<br />

and meat production per animal (6.8 kg of meat<br />

and 24.8 kg of milk per animal per year in the<br />

mixed farming systems) 10 .<br />

> Prices are relatively high, <strong>for</strong> example:<br />

• Brazil exports chickens at a cost 25% below<br />

that of Senegal’s poultry industry, due <strong>to</strong> the<br />

competitiveness of its production stream, which<br />

has low labour and raw materials costs 22 .<br />

• Brazil, Argentina or Australia are able <strong>to</strong> ship<br />

beef carcasses <strong>to</strong> Africa at about US$1/kg<br />

(carcass price <strong>for</strong> the producer), which is 40%<br />

less than the going price in West Africa. 22<br />

> Import/export figures:<br />

• SSA accounts <strong>for</strong> less that 2% of globally traded<br />

lives<strong>to</strong>ck products.<br />

• <strong>African</strong> production is not keeping pace with<br />

demand. Net imports of all lives<strong>to</strong>ck products<br />

are growing rapidly (see Figure 2) and cost the<br />

continent approximately US$ 5 billion in 2007.<br />

Three key problems are holding back<br />

competitiveness:<br />

1 Low on-farm productivity in terms of:<br />

• output per animal,<br />

• the cost of production (labour, feed, electricity<br />

etc, influenced by scale of operations),<br />

• on-farm efficiency. Animal mortality, morbidity,<br />

reproduction rates and feed conversion are all<br />

impacted by animal health and nutrition.<br />

An example of one disease’s (trypansomosis)<br />

impact on production is shown in Box 2.<br />

This applies <strong>to</strong> nearly all key production systems in<br />

SSA<br />

• Pas<strong>to</strong>ral systems, typified by a negative policy<br />

environment, low levels of infrastructure,<br />

remoteness, poor access <strong>to</strong> markets, services<br />

eg. veterinary, access <strong>to</strong> credit, education and<br />

seasonally poor nutrition with recurrent<br />

disease and drought shocks.<br />

• Small family-based lives<strong>to</strong>ck operations<br />

(poultry, dairy animals, etc.), often run by<br />

women, have proven themselves able <strong>to</strong><br />

generate additional income and cover on-farm<br />

consumption. However, without support, they<br />

struggle <strong>to</strong> supply consistent demand <strong>for</strong><br />

higher quality products in a reliable manner<br />

(see Nestlé case study Box 7, Section 6.3).<br />

• Intensive systems, mainly found near <strong>to</strong>wns<br />

and cities, include intensive production of<br />

poultry and pigs plus dairy operations,<br />

struggling <strong>to</strong> meet international sanitary,<br />

feeding and technical standards.<br />

2 Market access:<br />

• transaction costs are high with large numbers<br />

of intermediaries; road transport is expensive<br />

due <strong>to</strong> poor road condition and milk or live<br />

animals being transported long distances<br />

(if walked they lose condition).<br />

• the cost of doing business is high (local taxes,<br />

regulations, licenses, cost of compliance of<br />

adhering <strong>to</strong> SPS standards).<br />

• Africa’s producers are generally not competitive<br />

in global markets. (However, whilst high<br />

logistical costs raise prices and are a significant<br />

barrier <strong>to</strong> exports, these same logistical costs<br />

also provide a shield <strong>for</strong> domestic producers<br />

from imported commodities).<br />

3 Product quality:<br />

• Difficulty in adhering <strong>to</strong> technical standards,<br />

quality attributes (size, type of cut, etc), lack of<br />

downstream infrastructure (agro-industry)<br />

such as abat<strong>to</strong>irs, processing plants, eg.<br />

wholesale butchers able <strong>to</strong> supply structured<br />

markets such as <strong>to</strong>urism and the public sec<strong>to</strong>r.<br />

The Impetus Strategy Paper I Page 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!