Gift to
Ii Gift to - Free and Open Source Software
Ii Gift to - Free and Open Source Software
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
fro m p age 12<br />
LOOKING WEST<br />
o<br />
swer, the same answer we used<br />
<strong>to</strong> protect the 220·MHz band:<br />
Use it ! Keep six mete rs alive<br />
with activity t he sa me way 220 is<br />
th ese da ys. What about equ ipment?<br />
Except for some highpriced<br />
mu lti-mode transceivers,<br />
there is little around, and yo u do<br />
not want <strong>to</strong> front a bundle of<br />
green sta mps fo r a band that<br />
may not payoff in co ntacts.<br />
Well, I am wi lli ng <strong>to</strong> bet th at<br />
many of yo u have a remnant of<br />
the old days lying in the c lose t<br />
or ce llar. Maybe it 's an old Gonset<br />
I, II, III, or IV. Perhaps a vintage<br />
Clegg sse r, 66er, or Po lycomm<br />
6. How abou t a venerable<br />
Bent on Harbor Lunch Box? Dig<br />
it out, pl ug it in, and see if it still<br />
works. I'll bet it does. What<br />
about an antenna? Well , a simple<br />
dipo le is more th an adequate<br />
fo r local work. " But AM is<br />
dead . Nobody uses it anymore."<br />
True. AM on VHF is dead, but only<br />
becau se mo st of tho se who<br />
used <strong>to</strong> operate 6-meter AM<br />
went <strong>to</strong> 2-meter FM and deserte<br />
d 6 meters ent irely. Wh ile<br />
AM would not be we lcome these<br />
days on most ba nds, six is definit<br />
ely th e exception <strong>to</strong> the rule.<br />
Why? Because there is a lot of<br />
spectrum and very little ut ili zati<br />
on above 50.25. Most six-meter<br />
SSB ent husiasts han g aro und<br />
50.110 o r thereabouts. Stay<br />
above 50.25 and you wo n't be<br />
bot herin g a soul. If enough of<br />
you di g out the se relics of an era<br />
gone by and make use of them,<br />
you ca n literally have you r own<br />
privat e cha nnels <strong>to</strong> use as yo u<br />
see fit. Your expense? Tha t of a<br />
few feet of coax , so me zip co rd,<br />
and a few hours of work.<br />
"But I don't want <strong>to</strong> go on AM .<br />
It's so old-fashioned." True, AM<br />
is ou t-dated by <strong>to</strong>day's st andards,<br />
but most o ld tube-type<br />
AM rigs can be easi ly converted<br />
for FM use. The sim plest way is<br />
<strong>to</strong> use the existing AM modu <br />
la<strong>to</strong>r as an FM modula<strong>to</strong>r by reco<br />
nnec ting it <strong>to</strong> modu late the<br />
tr ansmit osc illa<strong>to</strong> r. Careful .<br />
cut th e gain co ntro l dow n it<br />
does not take very much audio<br />
<strong>to</strong> get eno ug h deviatio n fo r<br />
plu s/mi nus 5 kHz. Most cryst al<br />
man ufact urers can supply a<br />
tr ansmit rock for 52.525 which is<br />
the place most FMers on 6 meters<br />
moni<strong>to</strong>r. As far as th e receiver<br />
goe s, you can simp ly<br />
slope detect or co nvert the receiver<br />
<strong>to</strong> FM operat ion wi th the<br />
add iti on of a si mpl e integrated<br />
ci rcuit qu ad detec<strong>to</strong>r mounted<br />
on a small PC board. Many quad<br />
detec<strong>to</strong> r c hi ps have bu ilt-in<br />
squelch and limiting.<br />
Th ink such a conve rsion cannot<br />
be done? My new s-meter<br />
FM rig is nothing but a 1960s<br />
Lafa yett e HE-45B wit h a qu ad<br />
detect o r powered wit h vol tage<br />
st olen from the cathode of the<br />
aud io outpu t/modu lat or tube,<br />
wit h th e receive r osc illa<strong>to</strong> r now<br />
crystal controlled. To FM the<br />
tr ansm itter, I s im ply reco n<br />
nected the modu la<strong>to</strong>r t o supply<br />
mod ulated B plus <strong>to</strong> the origi nal<br />
crystal oscillat or and tied the<br />
2E26 fina l plate directl y <strong>to</strong> the<br />
unm odu lated B supply. r picked<br />
up 4 ext ra Watts o ut in th e bargain.<br />
Audio report s are good,<br />
and th ose I a s o seem shocked<br />
when I tell th em what I am running.<br />
Even better, this unit looks<br />
nicer than some old boat anchor,<br />
espe cia lly sitt ing on my desk.<br />
The antenna is a simple coax ial<br />
verti cal made from a lengt h of<br />
RG-59/U. Nothing exotic, and a<br />
<strong>to</strong>tal investme nt of under $14,<br />
incl uding crystals. Not sta te of<br />
the art , but more tha n sufficient.<br />
I also have a vintage Polycomm<br />
6 which I res<strong>to</strong>red <strong>to</strong> perf ect<br />
op erat ing conditio n and left<br />
unmodified fo r other uses. Thus<br />
far I have had about a half dozen<br />
AM asos si nce ret urni ng <strong>to</strong> the<br />
band . The ant enna on the Polyco<br />
mm is also a dipole, but this<br />
o ne a t raditional ho rizontal<br />
centerfed type.<br />
Six meters seems dead because<br />
most people w ho operat e<br />
the band listen rather than talk.<br />
They're waiting for th e other guy<br />
<strong>to</strong> call ca. Well, if everyone<br />
wait s, the re will be very few<br />
asos, wo n't there? It's up <strong>to</strong><br />
peo ple like you and me <strong>to</strong> wake<br />
up the ba nd. Old equipment<br />
works, is plentiful, and is Inexpensive.<br />
Even wit h the most rudimenta<br />
ry eq uip ment, alq ni f<br />
icant OX is po ssib le during spo r<br />
adic E and F2 openings. Wo rking<br />
extended groundwave, mete<br />
or scatter, tropo, and the like<br />
take s far more exotic equipment.<br />
But you wo uld be amazed<br />
at what can be worked with the<br />
oldies but goodi es. On July 25th ,<br />
1961, using a Clegg aaer 7-Watt<br />
AM transceiver and an indoor dipole,<br />
I QSOed KP4AXC in San<br />
Juan, Puer<strong>to</strong> Rico, from Brooklyn,<br />
New York. On May 19th,<br />
1965, wh ile st ill in Brook lyn, I<br />
csoee WA8 BTR in Cinci nnati ,<br />
Oh io. He was running a Halli <br />
crafters HT-40/SX·140 co mbo<br />
and I was using the same HE-45<br />
Lafayett e rig that has now become<br />
an FM bas e station. My<br />
.antenna at the ti me was a halo<br />
at op a e-s<strong>to</strong>rv apartment hou se.<br />
Or how abo ut 5 1. Lou is, Mis <br />
souri, on May 30th, 1961? I<br />
Osoed W'lJrN KG using my indoor<br />
di pole and a 15-Watl homebrew<br />
transmitter. Shall I go on?<br />
In all, so me 42 sta tes plus Puer<strong>to</strong><br />
Rico worked and 38 confi<br />
rmed prior <strong>to</strong> my going <strong>to</strong> SSB<br />
in the late 6Os_ It can be don e,<br />
and I have th e aSL ca rds <strong>to</strong><br />
prove it. Many of you reading<br />
this probably do, <strong>to</strong>o. Those<br />
we re great days. Six-meter OXers<br />
cooperat ed with o ne another,<br />
rag chew ing in a OX round<br />
table was co mmon when th e<br />
band was open , and there were<br />
none of those time-out timers,<br />
ja mmers, or po liticians <strong>to</strong> con <br />
cern oneself abo ut . If yo u are as<br />
tired of the latter as I am and<br />
happen <strong>to</strong> have a relic of th at era<br />
lying around , then why not fire it<br />
up? You migh t not hear mu ch at<br />
first, but try calli ng a ca. Who<br />
knows, if enoug h of us do this,<br />
we co uld repopulate the band<br />
and then move it <strong>to</strong>wa rd bigger<br />
and better things. Mo st im portant<br />
of all , we can secure this<br />
band from potential invasion by<br />
ill egals. If enou gh of us are<br />
there, they are not going <strong>to</strong> try<br />
anything. But if we leave the<br />
band vaca nt awa iting furt her<br />
FM deregulati on for expanded<br />
repeat er operation, we are invit<br />
ing di sas ter . CU on 6. _.as we<br />
used <strong>to</strong> say . .. AM , FM, or SSB.<br />
One final note <strong>to</strong> those of yo u<br />
w ho think that ITF is playing<br />
alarmi st and w ho think that six<br />
mete rs will always be safe because<br />
of th e TVI prob lem. In <strong>to</strong>da<br />
y's day and age, there is no<br />
suc h thi ng as safe amateur ·<br />
spectrum. Every kHz has a spec<br />
ific do llar va lue. There are<br />
th ose wh o look upon the spectrum<br />
devot ed <strong>to</strong> amateu r radio<br />
as pot entia l incom e if the y ca n<br />
stea l it from us. At this mom ent,<br />
there is no more vulnerable amateur<br />
spectrum than that which<br />
lies bet ween 50 and 54 MHz. It is<br />
in the same pos it ion that 220<br />
was some 5 years ago . I fi rmly<br />
b elieve that w e have two<br />
c hoices. Eit her we utilize th is<br />
spectrum or it will be lost t o another<br />
service. " Six meters- Use<br />
It or Lose It "<br />
JAMMER LOSES LICENSE<br />
DEPARTMENT<br />
In late 1978, there appeared<br />
o n the two-me ter amateur band<br />
in Los Ang eles a rather fou l<br />
mo uth ed individ ual usi ng a<br />
phoney callsign. Usi ng the call<br />
W6 J AM, this in dividual <strong>to</strong>rmented<br />
the users of the then<br />
W R6ABN repeater for ma ny<br />
month s. During this time, many<br />
letters were sent <strong>to</strong> the FCC and<br />
other go vernment agen cies in<br />
an attempt <strong>to</strong> obta in so me form<br />
of relief from this menace, but in<br />
the end it was his peers who loca<br />
ted him . Unfortu natel y ,<br />
W6JAM was found <strong>to</strong> be a Ii·<br />
c e nsed a m a teu r ope ra <strong>to</strong> r<br />
na med Sco tt Lookho lder, w hose<br />
real call sig n wa s W B6LHB.<br />
Lookho lde r w as eve nt ua l ly<br />
brought <strong>to</strong> tr ial, g iven a year's<br />
sus pended sent ence, and fined.<br />
All this was reported here in LW<br />
a nd in o ther amat eur publicati<br />
on s.<br />
In September of 1979, afte r an<br />
. Inord inat e amo unt of pressure<br />
fro m th e amateur co mmunity,<br />
th e Commlsssion acte d <strong>to</strong> suspend<br />
Lookholder's license.They<br />
also issued a Show Cause Order .<br />
as <strong>to</strong> why his license sho uld not<br />
be revoked. In my possession is<br />
a copy of th e fi nal Revocat io n<br />
and Suspension Orde r issued<br />
aga inst Lo ok hol der o n May<br />
16th, 1980, wi th an eff ec tive da te<br />
of Jun e 16th , 1980. Fro m it I have<br />
learned many th ings, includ ing<br />
the fact that Lookho lder never<br />
responded <strong>to</strong> the Show Cause<br />
Order.<br />
What I fo und most interesting<br />
, however, we re the "Conclusions<br />
of Law" upon w hic h the<br />
revocati on orde r was based. I<br />
got man y cl ues in<strong>to</strong> the thinki ng<br />
of th e FCC, as well as a hi nt as<br />
<strong>to</strong> how similar ma tt ers might be<br />
hand led by them in the future.<br />
After noting tha t Lookholder<br />
had been co nvicted in a Cou rt of<br />
Law for rep eated violations<br />
under 47 U.S.C_502, and sta ti ng<br />
that they, the Commissio n, had<br />
a mandat e <strong>to</strong> regulate radio<br />
co mmunica tio ns based upo n<br />
the Communications Act itself,<br />
th ey went on <strong>to</strong> cite so me rath er<br />
interesti ng legal interpretations<br />
that by this order have become<br />
possib le legal precedent.<br />
240 73 Magazine. Oct ober, 1980