Gift to
Ii Gift to - Free and Open Source Software
Ii Gift to - Free and Open Source Software
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Th e Comm issio n s tated ,<br />
" Lo ok hold er' s tra nsmission<br />
cannot be treated the same as<br />
wor ds spo ken In private, words<br />
spoken in public, or printed<br />
words . The Cou rts, Congress,<br />
and the Commi ssion have recognized<br />
that radio communication<br />
s have special qualities<br />
which di stinguish them from<br />
other modes of communication<br />
and expression ." (At this point,<br />
the finding s cited various cas es<br />
in which broa dcasters were involved,<br />
inc luding the famed Pacifica<br />
case involving radi o station<br />
WBA I in New York.) Co ntinuing<br />
. . . " Thus while the use of<br />
certain expre ss ions such as (expletive<br />
deleted) displayed in writing<br />
in public may be protected<br />
forms o f speech, neverthe <br />
less , government may properly<br />
act in many situati ons <strong>to</strong> prohibit<br />
intrusion int o the privacy of<br />
home of unwelcome views and<br />
ideas wh ich ca nnot <strong>to</strong>tall y be<br />
barred from the public dialogue."<br />
In essence, you can say<br />
w hat you wa nt in publi c, but if<br />
you do it on the radio , you can be<br />
held responsibl e for your wo rds.<br />
Maybe my inte rpretation is a bit<br />
simp le, but I think it fits.<br />
The finding went on: " The<br />
Commissi on has det ermined<br />
that the transmi ssi on of radio<br />
communicat ions containing<br />
ce rtain exp lic it wo rds (and<br />
for ms thereof)... are paten tly<br />
offe nsive <strong>to</strong> listeners, and that<br />
radio communicat ions containing<br />
such words fall wit hin the<br />
prohib iti ons of 18 U.S.C. 1464.<br />
Consequen tl y, these exp ressio<br />
ns are prohibited by Section<br />
97:119 of the Commission's<br />
Rules. Because of the nature of<br />
the Amateur Radio Service and<br />
its broad band of frequenc ies instead<br />
of limited channels, the<br />
audience of 350,000 amateur radio<br />
licensees and in add it ion<br />
shor twa ve listeners and those<br />
st udying for an amateur licen se<br />
are constantly tuning in and out<br />
of the radio bands and are subjected<br />
<strong>to</strong> unexpected contents<br />
of the communications. Like the<br />
broadcast in Paci fica, Lookholder'e<br />
tra nsmissio ns were uni quely<br />
access ible <strong>to</strong> children and<br />
could have enlarged a child's<br />
vocabulary in an instant, unli ke<br />
w ritt en messages."<br />
Unles s I read so methi ng<br />
wron g, in this fi ndi ng th e Commi<br />
ssion not es that the public<br />
has a right <strong>to</strong> be protected from<br />
being forced <strong>to</strong> list en via electromagneti<br />
c communicatio n <strong>to</strong><br />
anything it deems <strong>to</strong> be offensive,<br />
and cites the case of Pacifica's<br />
WBAI in which listeners<br />
were " treated" <strong>to</strong> what some felt<br />
was off ensive material. They<br />
th en stated tha t the actions of<br />
Lookho lder and those of Pac ifica<br />
were one and the same, thus<br />
cit ing action in ano ther service<br />
as preced ence in the revocati on<br />
of Lookhold er'e license.<br />
" Moreover, Lookholder's repeated<br />
tr ansm iss ion of o b<br />
scene, indecent, or profane language<br />
and its lntentlo nal Interferen<br />
ce with the tran smissi ons<br />
of other amateur li censees<br />
establishes a record of ors!nclln<br />
atlon <strong>to</strong> comply with Commiss<br />
ion rules. Thus revocation<br />
is not only warranted , but essential."<br />
I th ink that no comment is<br />
necessary, as t hi s sec ti on<br />
speaks for itself.<br />
The anger of the amateur<br />
communit y w as als o not ed:<br />
" Look holder' s tr ansm issions<br />
have ange red the ama teur community.<br />
The amateur community<br />
mus t be assured th at the<br />
Co mmissio n is prepared <strong>to</strong> act<br />
severely wh en its rules and regulati<br />
ons are bla tantly disregarded<br />
by amateur licensees, suc h<br />
as Lookho lder." Her ein the<br />
Commission wa s obv io us ly<br />
mak ing reference <strong>to</strong> th e myriad<br />
of comm u ni c ati ons se nt <strong>to</strong><br />
th em on th e matt er by amateurs<br />
of thi s area who were more than<br />
a bit upset by the situation. Obviously<br />
I am not a lawyer, but I<br />
sus pect that th is fin ding may<br />
give crede nce <strong>to</strong> the viability of<br />
suc h complaints as the basis for<br />
invest joat tnq such instances as<br />
this .<br />
The rest of the ord er was the<br />
necessary lega lese <strong>to</strong> invoke<br />
the revocatio n of Lookholder's<br />
li cense. However, a fo otn ot e<br />
was added that is of extreme<br />
significance in that it tie s <strong>to</strong>gethe<br />
r virtually all forms of radi o<br />
transmission under the obscenity<br />
ban. It reads as foll ows:<br />
" The Commission's enunciation<br />
that suc h words fell wit hin<br />
the proh ib ition of 18 U.S.C. 1464<br />
was within the context of Broadcas<br />
t Radio Stations. Of particular<br />
conce rn was the protecti<br />
on of c hildren and unconsenting<br />
adults who do not want such<br />
language tra nsmi tt ed in<strong>to</strong> their<br />
homes. These consi derat io ns<br />
are equally tru e of the Amateur<br />
Radio Service where ther e are<br />
no minimum age requirements<br />
for licens ing (97.9), where there<br />
are, as th is case reveals, co m<br />
plai nts aga inst suc h language<br />
on amateur radio , and where the<br />
potential recepti on of the tran s<br />
miss ion is widespread, as co n<br />
firmed by the fac t that Lookholder's<br />
transmissions were on<br />
fr eq uen ci e s w ith potential<br />
worldwide propagation."<br />
I have stated in this column<br />
many times that it is my belie f<br />
that an amate ur license is not a<br />
li cens e <strong>to</strong> say anything yo u<br />
want, when you wa nt, whet her<br />
your language is welcome or<br />
not. Your license is a permit<br />
granted <strong>to</strong> you by our govern <br />
ment <strong>to</strong> communicate through<br />
the use of electro magnetic rad io<br />
at ion on pre-determined spectrum<br />
in exact accordance with<br />
regulations as set fo rth by the<br />
governing body, l.e., the FCC. If<br />
you are a jammer or thi nking of<br />
beco ming a jamme r, then I suqgest<br />
you weigh the potential<br />
conseq uences. By this act ion ,<br />
the Commiss ion has set a long<br />
needed precedent that can be<br />
used against you. They can ta ke<br />
your lice nse. They can take other<br />
punitive action. You might<br />
even w ind up in prison, or at<br />
least have <strong>to</strong> pay a stiff fine<br />
along wit h court costs.<br />
Whe n Lookholder pled guilty<br />
and was hence conv icted , many<br />
amateurs were ange red that it<br />
<strong>to</strong>o k so long for the FCC <strong>to</strong> even<br />
suspen d his license, let alone revoke<br />
it. It was well over a year<br />
and a half from the time of the<br />
con viction unt il the time the<br />
revocati on order <strong>to</strong>ok effect.<br />
I'm looking fo r a used HF<br />
linear amplifier . I'd pref er one<br />
wit hout tubes. Condition not important,<br />
price is! Please make<br />
offers.<br />
Dante Ventriere KA4JRE<br />
17831 NW 81 Aye.<br />
Hialeah FL 33015<br />
I need inf orm ati on on hint s,<br />
kinks, and mod ificat io ns for the<br />
Kenwood TR-7400A, especially<br />
for out-of-band ope ration. I also<br />
need in formatio n on a squelch<br />
ci rcu it fo r the Mot oro la Pagecom<br />
low-band pager. I am w ill·<br />
ing <strong>to</strong> pay a reasonable price for<br />
inform ati on.<br />
HAM HELP<br />
Richard Mc Laughlin, Jr.<br />
WB8TOE<br />
4237 Dickman 38<br />
Spring field MI49015<br />
Many amate urs openly condemned<br />
the Com miss io n for its<br />
slow ness in acting on the matte<br />
r, but with the publication of<br />
this docum ent , it is apparent<br />
that this time was well spent in<br />
preparation. It is well thought<br />
out, well prepa red, and, mo st import<br />
ant, it seems <strong>to</strong> set the legal<br />
precedent tha t the commrss <strong>to</strong>rr<br />
needed <strong>to</strong> act against such offenders.<br />
Keep in mind that the<br />
next time , the Commission need<br />
onl y cite th is case as grounds<br />
for a revocat ion action aga inst a<br />
regula<strong>to</strong>ry viola<strong>to</strong>r who f ills our<br />
airwa ves wit h his or her profanity.<br />
They obviou sly were looking<br />
<strong>to</strong> set an air-tlqh t legal precedent,<br />
and in my untrained but<br />
optimistic view, I thin k the y<br />
have. People versed in communications<br />
law w ith whom I have<br />
conversed tend <strong>to</strong> agree. The<br />
FCC now has a weapon <strong>to</strong> use<br />
aga inst the foul mouth, and let's<br />
hope they go <strong>to</strong> it sw iftly.<br />
There is only one thing I wo n<br />
der about. Does the real holder<br />
of a callsign suc h as W6JAM<br />
have any legal recour se again st<br />
someo ne who has blasphemed<br />
said ca ll and used it illegally?<br />
That's one that some of you legal<br />
typ es might wa nt <strong>to</strong> look in<strong>to</strong>.<br />
Meanwhile, sc ratc h one jam <br />
mer. He jamm ed; he got caught;<br />
he's no longer an amateur. The<br />
b urea uc racy of Washi ngt on<br />
may move slow ly, but once the<br />
steam roller gets going, there is<br />
seemingly no way <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p it.<br />
I am in need of an opera<strong>to</strong>r's<br />
ma nual fo r a Tempo One transceiver.<br />
I al so need an ope ra<strong>to</strong>r's<br />
manual f or a Hall icra ft er s<br />
SR·15Otranscelver. I will be gl ad<br />
<strong>to</strong> pay for postage and copying,<br />
but please send a postcard first.<br />
Than k you.<br />
Claude Laroche KAIBNA<br />
RFD 2, Georgia Road<br />
SI. Albans VT 05478<br />
J<br />
If anyone has cur ed an ignition<br />
nois e pro blem, on transmit,<br />
in the KDK 2016A, I sure would<br />
like <strong>to</strong> know abo ut it. Also, if<br />
anyone knows of an RIT mod for<br />
the Heath HW-101, please let me<br />
know .<br />
Jerry Lynn WB7WBW<br />
3017 First Ave. No.<br />
Great Falls MT 59401<br />
73 Magazine . Oct obe r,1 980 241