27.09.2015 Views

INDICATORS

ECHIM Final Report

ECHIM Final Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Antti Tuomi-Nikula, Ari-Pekka Sihvonen, Jürgen Thelen<br />

5. IMPLEMENTATION OF ECHI <strong>INDICATORS</strong><br />

5.1. The implementation process and tools<br />

The first step in the process of implementing the ECHI indicators was to assess the<br />

current situation in EU Member States with regard to indicators and data. This<br />

involved, first, collecting and summarising the evidence already provided by all the<br />

main international sources of information such as Eurostat, the WHO, the OECD<br />

and the previous EU project reports prepared under the DG SANCO Public Health<br />

Programme. The results of this exercise were summarised in the Country Reports, which<br />

outline the availability of health indicator data by country in international databases, as<br />

described in Chapter 4.<br />

The second step in the implementation process was to deepen the information gathered<br />

in the Country Reports by a survey covering all EU Member States, Candidate Countries<br />

and EFTA/EEA countries. It was deemed necessary to gather further information in<br />

order to be able to assess which additional health data and indicators not found in the<br />

international databases are available in each country at the moment and in the near<br />

future, from which sources the health information is derived, and to gain an overview<br />

of the health information and health reporting systems in each of the participating<br />

countries. This was done by the ECHIM Survey.<br />

The specific topics dealt with in the ECHIM Survey were the availability of data for the<br />

ECHI shortlist indicators with regional subdivisions and other breakdowns as well as<br />

time series, possible new data sources and their accessibility and quality, organisations<br />

gathering data and institutes producing health statistics, further details of health<br />

information and health reporting systems, and future expectations. The respondents<br />

were also asked about their initial ideas of how to promote implementation of the ECHI<br />

indicator system in their countries.<br />

The ECHIM Survey was addressed to the ECHIM contact persons in all 32<br />

participating countries. The contact persons are public health specialists who mainly<br />

work for the responsible national authorities, usually public health authorities, regional<br />

public health authorities and statistical offices, and Ministries of Health. The contact<br />

persons were expected to reply to the survey based on their own understanding of the<br />

56

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!