07.12.2012 Views

WOMEN 'S HEALTH AND MENOPAUSE : - National Heart, Lung ...

WOMEN 'S HEALTH AND MENOPAUSE : - National Heart, Lung ...

WOMEN 'S HEALTH AND MENOPAUSE : - National Heart, Lung ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 11–3 (continued)<br />

Thus, a strong association between HRT and invasive<br />

or borderline malignant epithelial ovarian neoplasms<br />

can be excluded, although relationships<br />

with histological subtypes may exist. However, it<br />

is possible that ovarian cancers in women who had<br />

used HRT are more often classified as endometrioid<br />

tumors, and there is a lack of clear understanding<br />

of the biologic meaning of histologic type.<br />

Very little information is available on the addition<br />

of progestin to estrogen preparations. In a cohort of<br />

4,544 women, recruited since 1978 from 21 menopause<br />

clinics in Britain and followed to 1988, 55<br />

HRT use could not be related to ovarian cancer risk<br />

increase (RR = 0.63); similarly, in a multicenter<br />

case-control study (N = 377 cases and 2,030 controls)<br />

conducted between 1976 and 1985 in various<br />

United States areas (Kaufman et al., 1989), 98 only<br />

2 percent of cases and controls had ever used combination<br />

HRT, and the multivariate RR was 0.7 (95<br />

percent CI 0.2–1.8).<br />

Thus, the evidence on HRT and ovarian cancer is less<br />

consistent than that for endometrial and breast cancer,<br />

but a moderate association remains open to debate.<br />

234<br />

Overviews<br />

Reference<br />

Whittemore et al., 105 1992,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

Harris et al., 106 1992,<br />

U.S.A.<br />

Study Design<br />

Pooled analysis of<br />

12 U.S. hospitalandpopulationbased<br />

case-control<br />

studies<br />

As above<br />

No. of Cases<br />

(Age Group)<br />

2,197<br />

(all ages)<br />

327<br />

(all ages)<br />

Relative Risks<br />

for Ever HRT Use<br />

0.9/1.1<br />

0.9/1.1<br />

5. COLORECTAL CANCER<br />

Observations<br />

Invasive cancers.<br />

No duration-risk<br />

relationship.<br />

Borderline ovarian<br />

neoplasms. Hospitalbased/population-based<br />

studies. No duration-risk<br />

relationship.<br />

Colorectal cancer is the most frequent cancer in<br />

nonsmokers of both sexes combined in Western<br />

countries. 87,110 Similar incidences between the two<br />

sexes are seen for colon cancer, while a male<br />

predominance is found for rectal cancer.<br />

During the last two decades, mortality rates from<br />

colorectal cancer in many developed countries<br />

have declined in women but not in men. 24,87 A role<br />

of exogenous female hormones (i.e., OCs, and<br />

HRT) on these trends is possible.<br />

Eight cohort studies (see table 11–4) reported<br />

information on HRT use and colorectal cancer risk,<br />

for a total of over 2,400 cases. Most studies<br />

showed RRs around or below unity. A significant<br />

inverse relation was found in two cohort investigations,<br />

including the largest one focusing on fatal<br />

colon cancers (table 11–4). 56,90,111–119 Findings from a<br />

recent study also suggested that HRT use may<br />

improve short-term survival after a diagnosis of<br />

colon cancer. 120

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!